These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25109494)

  • 1. A generalized linear factor model approach to the hierarchical framework for responses and response times.
    Molenaar D; Tuerlinckx F; van der Maas HL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):197-219. PubMed ID: 25109494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using response time data to reduce testing time in cognitive tests.
    Bertling M; Weeks JP
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Mar; 30(3):328-338. PubMed ID: 28447813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of item response models for accuracy and speed of item responses with applications to adaptive testing.
    van Rijn PW; Ali US
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):317-345. PubMed ID: 28474769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The linear transformation model with frailties for the analysis of item response times.
    Wang C; Chang HH; Douglas JA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):144-68. PubMed ID: 22506914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
    Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response times.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):13-38. PubMed ID: 28635139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response moderation models for conditional dependence between response time and response accuracy.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J; Molenaar D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):257-279. PubMed ID: 27618470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A note on the hierarchical model for responses and response times in tests of van der Linden (2007).
    Ranger J
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jul; 78(3):538-44. PubMed ID: 25106399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling Differences Between Response Times of Correct and Incorrect Responses.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1018-1046. PubMed ID: 31463656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A generalized dimensionality discrepancy measure for dimensionality assessment in multidimensional item response theory.
    Levy R; Svetina D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):208-32. PubMed ID: 21492129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterizing the Manifest Probability Distributions of Three Latent Trait Models for Accuracy and Response Time.
    Marsman M; Sigurdardóttir H; Bolsinova M; Maris G
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):870-891. PubMed ID: 30919229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Bivariate Generalized Linear Item Response Theory Modeling Framework to the Analysis of Responses and Response Times.
    Molenaar D; Tuerlinckx F; van der Maas HL
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(1):56-74. PubMed ID: 26609743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stochastic search item selection for factor analytic models.
    Mavridis D; Ntzoufras I
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 May; 67(2):284-303. PubMed ID: 23837882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence analysis for the factor analysis model with ranking data.
    Xu L; Poon WY; Lee SY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):133-61. PubMed ID: 18482479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of maximal reliability for multiple-component instruments in multilevel designs.
    Raykov T; Penev S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):129-42. PubMed ID: 18001517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An accumulator model for responses and response times in tests based on the proportional hazards model.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):388-407. PubMed ID: 23992122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multilevel modelling: Beyond the basic applications.
    Wright DB; London K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):439-56. PubMed ID: 18664317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semi-parametric proportional hazards models with crossed random effects for psychometric response times.
    Loeys T; Legrand C; Schettino A; Pourtois G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 May; 67(2):304-27. PubMed ID: 23937392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian hierarchical response time modelling-A tutorial.
    Koenig C; Becker B; Ulitzsch E
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Nov; 76(3):623-645. PubMed ID: 36811176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A mixture hierarchical model for response times and response accuracy.
    Wang C; Xu G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Nov; 68(3):456-77. PubMed ID: 25873487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.