These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25110852)

  • 1. Expression of executive control in situational context: Effects of facilitating versus restraining cues on snack food consumption.
    Hall P; Tran B; Lowe C; Vincent C; Mourtzakis M; Liu-Ambrose T; Prapavessis H; Gidron Y
    Health Psychol; 2015 May; 34(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 25110852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Executive control resources and snack food consumption in the presence of restraining versus facilitating cues.
    Hall PA; Lowe C; Vincent C
    J Behav Med; 2014 Aug; 37(4):587-94. PubMed ID: 23943139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of continuous theta burst stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on executive function, food cravings, and snack food consumption.
    Lowe CJ; Hall PA; Staines WR
    Psychosom Med; 2014 Sep; 76(7):503-11. PubMed ID: 25215552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An exploration of exercise-induced cognitive enhancement and transfer effects to dietary self-control.
    Lowe CJ; Kolev D; Hall PA
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Dec; 110():102-111. PubMed ID: 27117045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined effects of cognitive bias for food cues and poor inhibitory control on unhealthy food intake.
    Kakoschke N; Kemps E; Tiggemann M
    Appetite; 2015 Apr; 87():358-64. PubMed ID: 25592403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inhibitory self-control moderates the effect of changed implicit food evaluations on snack food consumption.
    Haynes A; Kemps E; Moffitt R
    Appetite; 2015 Jul; 90():114-22. PubMed ID: 25765247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chronic stress exposure may affect the brain's response to high calorie food cues and predispose to obesogenic eating habits.
    Tryon MS; Carter CS; Decant R; Laugero KD
    Physiol Behav; 2013 Aug; 120():233-42. PubMed ID: 23954410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reducing high calorie snack food in young adults: a role for social norms and health based messages.
    Robinson E; Harris E; Thomas J; Aveyard P; Higgs S
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2013 Jun; 10():73. PubMed ID: 23738741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of altering proximity on snack food intake in individuals with high and low executive function: study protocol.
    Hunter JA; Hollands GJ; Couturier DL; Marteau TM
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Jun; 16():504. PubMed ID: 27297225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The moderating role of state inhibitory control in the effect of evaluative conditioning on temptation and unhealthy snacking.
    Haynes A; Kemps E; Moffitt R
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Dec; 152(Pt A):135-42. PubMed ID: 26409213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Snack intake is reduced using an implicit, high-level construal cue.
    Price M; Higgs S; Lee M
    Health Psychol; 2016 Aug; 35(8):923-6. PubMed ID: 27505217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensory specific satiety and intake: the difference between nibble- and bar-size snacks.
    Weijzen PL; Liem DG; Zandstra EH; de Graaf C
    Appetite; 2008; 50(2-3):435-42. PubMed ID: 17977618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Targeting implicit approach reactions to snack food in children: Effects on intake.
    Folkvord F; Veling H; Hoeken H
    Health Psychol; 2016 Aug; 35(8):919-22. PubMed ID: 27505216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Whether or not to eat: A controlled laboratory study of discriminative cueing effects on food intake in humans.
    Ridley-Siegert TL; Crombag HS; Yeomans MR
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Dec; 152(Pt B):347-53. PubMed ID: 26145752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resistance reminders: Dieters reduce energy intake after exposure to diet-congruent food images compared to control non-food images.
    Buckland NJ; Finlayson G; Edge R; Hetherington MM
    Appetite; 2014 Feb; 73():189-96. PubMed ID: 24239808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring food reward and the transfer effect of sensory specific satiety.
    Griffioen-Roose S; Finlayson G; Mars M; Blundell JE; de Graaf C
    Appetite; 2010 Dec; 55(3):648-55. PubMed ID: 20870002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of awareness that food intake is being measured by a universal eating monitor on the consumption of a pasta lunch and a cookie snack in healthy female volunteers.
    Thomas JM; Dourish CT; Higgs S
    Appetite; 2015 Sep; 92():247-51. PubMed ID: 26048004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduce temptation or resist it? Experienced temptation mediates the relationship between implicit evaluations of unhealthy snack foods and subsequent intake.
    Haynes A; Kemps E; Moffitt R; Mohr P
    Psychol Health; 2015; 30(5):534-50. PubMed ID: 25384041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subjective and objective indices of the satiating effect of foods. Can people predict how filling a food will be?
    Green SM; Blundell JE
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1996 Dec; 50(12):798-806. PubMed ID: 8968700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association of nutrient-dense snack combinations with calories and vegetable intake.
    Wansink B; Shimizu M; Brumberg A
    Pediatrics; 2013 Jan; 131(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 23248234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.