These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25110986)

  • 1. On simplified global nonlinear function for fitness landscape: a case study of inverse protein folding.
    Xu Y; Hu C; Dai Y; Liang J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104403. PubMed ID: 25110986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing optimal non-linear scoring function for protein design.
    Hu C; Li X; Liang J
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(17):3080-98. PubMed ID: 15217818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal nonlinear scoring function for global fitness landscape of protein design.
    Hu C; Li X; Liang J
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2004; 2004():2828-31. PubMed ID: 17270866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Novel nonlinear knowledge-based mean force potentials based on machine learning.
    Dong Q; Zhou S
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(2):476-86. PubMed ID: 20820079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring the sequence fitness landscape of a bridge between protein folds.
    Tian P; Best RB
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Oct; 16(10):e1008285. PubMed ID: 33048928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SVR_CAF: an integrated score function for detecting native protein structures among decoys.
    Zhou J; Yan W; Hu G; Shen B
    Proteins; 2014 Apr; 82(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 24115148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state.
    Zhang C; Liu S; Zhou H; Zhou Y
    Protein Sci; 2004 Feb; 13(2):400-11. PubMed ID: 14739325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decoy selection for protein structure prediction via extreme gradient boosting and ranking.
    Akhter N; Chennupati G; Djidjev H; Shehu A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Dec; 21(Suppl 1):189. PubMed ID: 33297949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Structure refinement of protein model decoys requires accurate side-chain placement.
    Olson MA; Lee MS
    Proteins; 2013 Mar; 81(3):469-78. PubMed ID: 23070940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Co-Evolutionary Fitness Landscapes for Sequence Design.
    Tian P; Louis JM; Baber JL; Aniana A; Best RB
    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2018 May; 57(20):5674-5678. PubMed ID: 29512300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Atomic interaction networks in the core of protein domains and their native folds.
    Soundararajan V; Raman R; Raguram S; Sasisekharan V; Sasisekharan R
    PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e9391. PubMed ID: 20186337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A decoy set for the thermostable subdomain from chicken villin headpiece, comparison of different free energy estimators.
    Fogolari F; Tosatto SC; Colombo G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 6():301. PubMed ID: 16354298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simple procedure to weight empirical potentials in a fitness function so as to optimize its performance in ab initio protein-folding problem.
    Agostini L; Morosetti S
    Biophys Chem; 2003 Aug; 105(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 12932583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. De novo and inverse folding predictions of protein structure and dynamics.
    Godzik A; Kolinski A; Skolnick J
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 1993 Aug; 7(4):397-438. PubMed ID: 8229093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can molecular dynamics simulations help in discriminating correct from erroneous protein 3D models?
    Taly JF; Marin A; Gibrat JF
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 9():6. PubMed ID: 18179702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evolution-based approach to De Novo protein design and case study on Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
    Mitra P; Shultis D; Brender JR; Czajka J; Marsh D; Gray F; Cierpicki T; Zhang Y
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013 Oct; 9(10):e1003298. PubMed ID: 24204234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Constructing a folding model for protein S6 guided by native fluctuations deduced from NMR structures.
    Lammert H; Noel JK; Haglund E; Schug A; Onuchic JN
    J Chem Phys; 2015 Dec; 143(24):243141. PubMed ID: 26723626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Local interactions in protein folding determined through an inverse folding model.
    Bastolla U; Porto M; Ortíz AR
    Proteins; 2008 Apr; 71(1):278-99. PubMed ID: 17932940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using a hydrophobic contact potential to evaluate native and near-native folds generated by molecular dynamics simulations.
    Huang ES; Subbiah S; Tsai J; Levitt M
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Apr; 257(3):716-25. PubMed ID: 8648635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On Representing Protein Folding Patterns Using Non-Linear Parametric Curves.
    Kasarapu P; de la Banda MG; Konagurthu AS
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2014; 11(6):1218-28. PubMed ID: 26357057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.