These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25112138)
1. Antitrust and the future of nursing: federal competition policy and the scope of practice. Gilman DJ; Fairman J Health Matrix Clevel; 2014; 24():143-208. PubMed ID: 25112138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Health care reform and competing visions of medical care: antitrust and state provider cooperation legislation. Blumstein JF Cornell Law Rev; 1994 Sep; 79(6):1459-506. PubMed ID: 10141441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Establishing physician networks within evolving antitrust guidelines. Retchin TN; Retchin SM Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1997; 5(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 10169186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health care reform: antitrust and competitive implications for nursing. Jenkins SM AAOHN J; 1994 Feb; 42(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 8147993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Senate subcommittee to probe GPO influence. DeJohn P Hosp Mater Manage; 2001 Aug; 26(8):1, 10-1. PubMed ID: 11499225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Avoiding antitrust problems in ambulatory health care. Giacalone DA Med Group Manage; 1987; 34(5):39-40. PubMed ID: 10284294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Economic analysis in health care antitrust. Vita MG; Langenfeld J; Pautler P; Miller L J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():73-115. PubMed ID: 10111250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Competition and antitrust enforcement in the changing pharmaceutical marketplace. Whitener MD Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(2):301-7. PubMed ID: 10342998 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The stifling of competition by the antitrust laws: the irony of the health care industry. Powers JA J Law Health; 2000-2001; 15(2):223-46. PubMed ID: 12238323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Antitrust policy in the Dutch health care system and the relevance of EEC competition policy and U.S. antitrust practice. Schut FT; Greenberg W; van de Ven WP Health Policy; 1991 Apr; 17(3):257-84. PubMed ID: 10170742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physicians can't unite to stifle competition. Adelman SA Med Econ; 2008 Dec; 85(23):36. PubMed ID: 19209535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Networks can avoid antitrust scrutiny. Waxman JM Provider; 1997 Feb; 23(2):42-5. PubMed ID: 10167120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Health care and the federal antitrust laws: the likelihood of a harmonious coexistence. Remis RE J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 13(1):113-35. PubMed ID: 9068239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Learn from experience of IPA targeted in antitrust suit. Mesa County IPA prevailed, but making changes. Manag Care Strateg; 1998 May; 6(5):53-4. PubMed ID: 10181769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Washington turns up antitrust heat on doctors. Slomski AJ Med Econ; 1991 Aug; 68(15):42-8. PubMed ID: 10112155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Antitrust, health care quality, and the courts. Hammer PJ; Sage WM Columbia Law Rev; 2002 Apr; 102(3):545-649. PubMed ID: 11985363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical care. Antitrust laws emerging exemption. Troupis JR Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1997 Jul; ():3-10. PubMed ID: 10173326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The fraud and abuse statute in an evolving health care marketplace: life in the health care speakeasy. Blumstein JF Am J Law Med; 1996; 22(2-3):205-31. PubMed ID: 8862242 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]