These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25112431)
21. Reducing Bias in Estimates of Per Protocol Treatment Effects: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Cole SR; Edwards JK; Zivich PN; Shook-Sa BE; Hudgens MG; Stringer JSA JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2325907. PubMed ID: 37494045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bias in case-control studies. A review. Kopec JA; Esdaile JM J Epidemiol Community Health; 1990 Sep; 44(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 2273353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Research Note: Evaluating risk of bias in randomised controlled trials. Moseley AM; Pinheiro MB J Physiother; 2022 Apr; 68(2):148-150. PubMed ID: 35283051 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Toward reducing bias in clinical trials: central readers for endoscopic endpoints. Kane SV; Ananthakrishnan AN Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jan; 83(1):198-200. PubMed ID: 26706305 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Randomized controlled trials insufficiently focus on reducing medical overuse. Kampman JM; Turgman O; van der Ven WH; Hermanides J; Sperna Weiland NH; Hollmann MW; Repping S Eur J Epidemiol; 2023 Aug; 38(8):913-916. PubMed ID: 37335385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Risk of bias in assessing Risk of Bias. Wilkins AJ Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):107-109. PubMed ID: 27905121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The rationale for rating risk of bias should be fully reported. Faggion CM J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():238. PubMed ID: 27034096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The rationale for rating risk of bias should be fully reported: response. Whiting P; Savović J J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():239. PubMed ID: 27034095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Risk of bias: Worse than it appears. Berger VW Int J Nurs Pract; 2016 Feb; 22(1):111. PubMed ID: 26916061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. From question-behaviour effects in trials to the social psychology of research participation. McCambridge J Psychol Health; 2015 Jan; 30(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 25146179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing immediate and delayed weight bearing in patients with ankle open reduction internal fixation-A protocol for feasibility randomised controlled trial. Mason B; Jafarian Tangrood Z; Sharr J; Powell A Contemp Clin Trials Commun; 2024 Jun; 39():101304. PubMed ID: 38826866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A systematic review of behaviour change interventions to improve maternal health outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa. Muriithi FG; Banke-Thomas A; Forbes G; Gakuo RW; Thomas E; Gallos ID; Devall A; Coomarasamy A; Lorencatto F PLOS Glob Public Health; 2024; 4(2):e0002950. PubMed ID: 38377077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. SmartFeeding4Kids, an online self-guided parenting intervention to promote positive feeding practices and healthy diet in young children: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Gomes AI; Pereira AI; Guerreiro T; Branco D; Roberto MS; Pires A; Sousa J; Baranowski T; Barros L Trials; 2021 Dec; 22(1):930. PubMed ID: 34922616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of risk of generalizability biases in adult obesity interventions: A meta-epidemiological review and meta-analysis. Beets MW; von Klinggraeff L; Burkart S; Jones A; Ioannidis JPA; Weaver RG; Okely AD; Lubans D; van Sluijs E; Jago R; Turner-McGrievy G; Thrasher J; Li X Obes Rev; 2022 Feb; 23(2):e13369. PubMed ID: 34779122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Economic Evaluation of Web- versus Telephone-based Interventions to Simultaneously Increase Colorectal and Breast Cancer Screening Among Women. Huang D; Lairson DR; Chung TH; Monahan PO; Rawl SM; Champion VL Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2021 Sep; 14(9):905-916. PubMed ID: 34244154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Changing parental feeding practices through web-based interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gomes AI; Pereira AI; Roberto MS; Boraska K; Barros L PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250231. PubMed ID: 33909666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Carer administration of as-needed subcutaneous medication for breakthrough symptoms in people dying at home: the CARiAD feasibility RCT. Poolman M; Roberts J; Wright S; Hendry A; Goulden N; Holmes EA; Byrne A; Perkins P; Hoare Z; Nelson A; Hiscock J; Hughes D; O'Connor J; Foster B; Reymond L; Healy S; Lewis P; Wee B; Johnstone R; Roberts R; Parkinson A; Roberts S; Wilkinson C Health Technol Assess; 2020 May; 24(25):1-150. PubMed ID: 32484432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Identification and evaluation of risk of generalizability biases in pilot versus efficacy/effectiveness trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Beets MW; Weaver RG; Ioannidis JPA; Geraci M; Brazendale K; Decker L; Okely AD; Lubans D; van Sluijs E; Jago R; Turner-McGrievy G; Thrasher J; Li X; Milat AJ Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2020 Feb; 17(1):19. PubMed ID: 32046735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Psychological interventions for co-occurring depression and substance use disorders. Hides L; Quinn C; Stoyanov S; Kavanagh D; Baker A Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 2019(11):. PubMed ID: 31769015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]