These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25112972)

  • 1. Calibrating corneal material model parameters using only inflation data: an ill-posed problem.
    Kok S; Botha N; Inglis HM
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2014 Dec; 30(12):1460-75. PubMed ID: 25112972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Applanation pressure function in Goldmann tonometry and its correction.
    Śródka W
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2013; 15(3):97-106. PubMed ID: 24215153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Numerical modelling of corneal biomechanical behaviour.
    Elsheikh A; Wang D
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2007 Apr; 10(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 18651274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of cornea material stiffness on measured intraocular pressure.
    Kwon TH; Ghaboussi J; Pecknold DA; Hashash YM
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(8):1707-13. PubMed ID: 18455173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraocular pressure: Goldmann tonometry, computational model, and calibration equation.
    Guzmán AF; Castilla AA; Guarnieri FA; Rodríguez FR
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Jan; 22(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 21946545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the material parameters of the human cornea in a numerical model.
    Sródka W
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2011; 13(3):77-85. PubMed ID: 22098299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A numerical-experimental protocol to characterize corneal tissue with an application to predict astigmatic keratotomy surgery.
    Ariza-Gracia MÁ; Ortillés Á; Cristóbal JÁ; Rodríguez Matas JF; Calvo B
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Oct; 74():304-314. PubMed ID: 28648990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of corneal edema on intraocular pressure measurements using goldmann applanation tonometry, Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ORA: an in vitro model.
    Neuburger M; Maier P; Böhringer D; Reinhard T; F Jordan J
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Sep; 22(7):584-90. PubMed ID: 22366704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics in Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and after posterior lamellar keratoplasty.
    Clemmensen K; Hjortdal J
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 92(4):350-4. PubMed ID: 23607620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Numerical study on human cornea and modified multiparametric correction equation for Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Khan MA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Feb; 30():91-102. PubMed ID: 24269944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Air-puff associated quantification of non-linear biomechanical properties of the human cornea in vivo.
    Sinha Roy A; Kurian M; Matalia H; Shetty R
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Aug; 48():173-182. PubMed ID: 25955559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization of corneal tangent modulus in vivo.
    Ko MW; Leung LK; Lam DC; Leung CK
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Jun; 91(4):e263-9. PubMed ID: 23336962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure differences between an air-puff tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Tranchina L; Lombardo M; Oddone F; Serrao S; Schiano Lomoriello D; Ducoli P
    J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(5):416-21. PubMed ID: 22366703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coupled biomechanical response of the cornea assessed by non-contact tonometry. A simulation study.
    Ariza-Gracia MÁ; Zurita JF; Piñero DP; Rodriguez-Matas JF; Calvo B
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121486. PubMed ID: 25780915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of corneal and fatty tissues biomechanical response in dynamic tonometry tests by using inverse models.
    Jannesari M; Kadkhodaei M; Mosaddegh P; Kasprzak H; Behrouz MJ
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2018; 20(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 29658515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity of corneal biomechanical and optical behavior to material parameters using design of experiments method.
    Xu M; Lerner AL; Funkenbusch PD; Richhariya A; Yoon G
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Feb; 21(3):287-296. PubMed ID: 29602301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of intraocular pressure and air jet pressure on corneal contactless tonometry tests.
    Simonini I; Pandolfi A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 May; 58():75-89. PubMed ID: 26282384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Corneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes.
    Lanza M; Borrelli M; De Bernardo M; Filosa ML; Rosa N
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 18794680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Corneal biomechanics measured with the ocular response analyser in patients with unilateral open-angle glaucoma.
    Hirneiss C; Neubauer AS; Yu A; Kampik A; Kernt M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Mar; 89(2):e189-92. PubMed ID: 21288308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
    Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.