328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25113310)
1. Removal of trace organic chemicals and performance of a novel hybrid ultrafiltration-osmotic membrane bioreactor.
Holloway RW; Regnery J; Nghiem LD; Cath TY
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Sep; 48(18):10859-68. PubMed ID: 25113310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Osmotic versus conventional membrane bioreactors integrated with reverse osmosis for water reuse: Biological stability, membrane fouling, and contaminant removal.
Luo W; Phan HV; Xie M; Hai FI; Price WE; Elimelech M; Nghiem LD
Water Res; 2017 Feb; 109():122-134. PubMed ID: 27883917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comprehensive bench- and pilot-scale investigation of trace organic compounds rejection by forward osmosis.
Hancock NT; Xu P; Heil DM; Bellona C; Cath TY
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(19):8483-90. PubMed ID: 21838294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of forward osmosis and microfiltration in an integrated osmotic-microfiltration membrane bioreactor system.
Luo W; Hai FI; Kang J; Price WE; Nghiem LD; Elimelech M
Chemosphere; 2015 Oct; 136():125-32. PubMed ID: 25966331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The feasibility of nanofiltration membrane bioreactor (NF-MBR)+reverse osmosis (RO) process for water reclamation: Comparison with ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor (UF-MBR)+RO process.
Tay MF; Liu C; Cornelissen ER; Wu B; Chong TH
Water Res; 2018 Feb; 129():180-189. PubMed ID: 29149673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rejection of trace organic compounds by forward osmosis membranes: a literature review.
Coday BD; Yaffe BG; Xu P; Cath TY
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Apr; 48(7):3612-24. PubMed ID: 24552278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MBR/RO/ozone processes for TFT-LCD industrial wastewater treatment and recycling.
Chen TK; Ni CH; Chan YC; Lu MC
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):411-9. PubMed ID: 16004003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Seawater-driven forward osmosis for enriching nitrogen and phosphorous in treated municipal wastewater: effect of membrane properties and feed solution chemistry.
Xue W; Tobino T; Nakajima F; Yamamoto K
Water Res; 2015 Feb; 69():120-130. PubMed ID: 25463933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Understanding the mechanisms of trace organic contaminant removal by high retention membrane bioreactors: a critical review.
Asif MB; Ansari AJ; Chen SS; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Hai FI
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(33):34085-34100. PubMed ID: 30259242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two treatments for the removal of selected organic micropollutants and bulk organic matter: conventional activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration versus membrane bioreactor.
Sahar E; Ernst M; Godehardt M; Hein A; Herr J; Kazner C; Melin T; Cikurel H; Aharoni A; Messalem R; Brenner A; Jekel M
Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(4):733-40. PubMed ID: 21330721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phosphorus and water recovery by a novel osmotic membrane bioreactor-reverse osmosis system.
Luo W; Hai FI; Price WE; Guo W; Ngo HH; Yamamoto K; Nghiem LD
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Jan; 200():297-304. PubMed ID: 26499404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of membrane bioreactor solids retention time on reverse osmosis membrane fouling for wastewater reuse.
Farias EL; Howe KJ; Thomson BM
Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():53-61. PubMed ID: 24316181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biodegradation characteristics and size fractionation of landfill leachate for integrated membrane treatment.
Insel G; Dagdar M; Dogruel S; Dizge N; Ubay Cokgor E; Keskinler B
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Sep; 260():825-32. PubMed ID: 23856313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of a novel baffled osmotic membrane bioreactor-microfiltration hybrid system under continuous operation for simultaneous nutrient removal and mitigation of brine discharge.
Pathak N; Chekli L; Wang J; Kim Y; Phuntsho S; Li S; Ghaffour N; Leiknes T; Shon H
Bioresour Technol; 2017 Sep; 240():50-58. PubMed ID: 28342575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of salinity on the changes of the biomass characteristics and on the performance of an OMBR treating tannery wastewater.
Luján-Facundo MJ; Fernández-Navarro J; Alonso-Molina JL; Amorós-Muñoz I; Moreno Y; Mendoza-Roca JA; Pastor-Alcañiz L
Water Res; 2018 Oct; 142():129-137. PubMed ID: 29864648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Novel Hybrid Reactor of Pressure-Retarded Osmosis Coupling with Activated Sludge Process for Simultaneously Treating Concentrated Seawater Brine and Wastewater and Recovering Energy.
Ding J; Zhou Q; Zhou Z; Chu W; Jiang Y; Lai W; Zhao P; Wang X
Membranes (Basel); 2022 Mar; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 35448350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Smart ultrafiltration membrane fouling control as desalination pretreatment of shale gas fracturing wastewater: The effects of backwash water.
Chang H; Li T; Liu B; Chen C; He Q; Crittenden JC
Environ Int; 2019 Sep; 130():104869. PubMed ID: 31228783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct and complete phosphorus recovery from municipal wastewater using a hybrid microfiltration-forward osmosis membrane bioreactor process with seawater brine as draw solution.
Qiu G; Law YM; Das S; Ting YP
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 May; 49(10):6156-63. PubMed ID: 25919506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant.
Chon K; Kim SJ; Moon J; Cho J
Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of fertilizer draw solution properties on the process performance and microbial community structure in a side-stream anaerobic fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis - ultrafiltration bioreactor.
Kim Y; Li S; Chekli L; Phuntsho S; Ghaffour N; Leiknes T; Shon HK
Bioresour Technol; 2017 Sep; 240():149-156. PubMed ID: 28279608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
