138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25113392)
1. Re: Impact of pelvicalyceal anatomy in treatment with shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy of lower pole renal stones.
Sener NC; Imamoglu A; Bas O; Ozturk U; Goktug G; Tuygun C; Bakirtas H
Urolithiasis; 2014 Dec; 42(6):559. PubMed ID: 25113392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of pelvicalyceal anatomy in treatment with shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy of lower pole renal stones.
Adanur S; Ziypak T
Urolithiasis; 2014 Aug; 42(4):373. PubMed ID: 24840300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Re: prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones smaller than 1 cm.
Assimos DG
J Urol; 2014 Jun; 191(6):1812-3. PubMed ID: 25280292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Management options for lower pole renal calculi.
Raman JD; Pearle MS
Curr Opin Urol; 2008 Mar; 18(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18303547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.
Matlaga BR; Jansen JP; Meckley LM; Byrne TW; Lingeman JE
J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 22591962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flexible ureteroscopy in conjunction with in situ lithotripsy for lower pole calculi.
Hollenbeck BK; Schuster TG; Faerber GJ; Wolf JS
Urology; 2001 Dec; 58(6):859-63. PubMed ID: 11744445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones.
Donaldson JF; Lardas M; Scrimgeour D; Stewart F; MacLennan S; Lam TB; McClinton S
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):612-6. PubMed ID: 25449204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Commentary on shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi.
Schenkman NS
J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5 Suppl):S74. PubMed ID: 18405760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy on moderate size renal pelvis stones.
Bas O; Bakirtas H; Sener NC; Ozturk U; Tuygun C; Goktug HN; Imamoglu MA
Urolithiasis; 2014 Apr; 42(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 24162954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Lower Caliceal Stones ≤2 cm: A Single-Center Experience.
Kumar A; Vasudeva P; Nanda B; Kumar N; Das MK; Jha SK
J Endourol; 2015 May; 29(5):575-9. PubMed ID: 25203489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy.
Preminger GM
Urol Res; 2006 Apr; 34(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 16463145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of combining flexible and rigid ureteroscopy for transurethral lithotripsy.
Shigemura K; Yasufuku T; Yamashita M; Arakawa S; Fujisawa M
Kobe J Med Sci; 2010 Aug; 56(1):E24-8. PubMed ID: 21063143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children.
Freton L; Peyronnet B; Arnaud A; Tondut L; Hascoet J; Pradère B; Verhoest G; Habonimana É; Azzis O; Fremond B; Bensalah K
J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 27824261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Lower pole calyceal stones].
Nagele U; Knoll T; Schilling D; Michel MS; Stenzl A
Urologe A; 2008 Jul; 47(7):875-84. PubMed ID: 18523751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones smaller than 1 cm.
Sener NC; Imamoglu MA; Bas O; Ozturk U; Goktug HN; Tuygun C; Bakirtas H
Urolithiasis; 2014 Apr; 42(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 24220692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Re: Sener et al.: asymptomatic lower pole small renal stones: shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureteroscopy, or observation? A prospective randomized trial (Urology 2015;85:33-37).
Karatag T; Buldu I; Istanbulluoglu MO
Urology; 2015 Mar; 85(3):709. PubMed ID: 25733297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Endoscopic techniques in the treatment of calculi in the upper urinary tract].
Hem E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1996 Oct; 116(24):2893-6. PubMed ID: 8975406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Trade-off Between Invasiveness and Efficacy: Ureteroscopy vs Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Commentary on: Comparative effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treating patients with kidney stones.
Shakeri A; Van Asseldonk B; Elterman DS
Urology; 2015 Nov; 86(5):850-1. PubMed ID: 26375846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
Resorlu B; Unsal A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2):E5. PubMed ID: 22734479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
