644 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25113943)
1. Static and rotational intensity modulated techniques for head-neck cancer radiotherapy: a planning comparison.
Broggi S; Perna L; Bonsignore F; Rinaldin G; Fiorino C; Chiara A; Frigerio C; Butti I; Sangalli G; Dell'Oca I; Di Muzio N; Cattaneo GM; Declich F
Phys Med; 2014 Dec; 30(8):973-9. PubMed ID: 25113943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Significant improvement in normal tissue sparing and target coverage for head and neck cancer by means of helical tomotherapy.
Fiorino C; Dell'Oca I; Pierelli A; Broggi S; De Martin E; Di Muzio N; Longobardi B; Fazio F; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16546279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dependence of achievable plan quality on treatment technique and planning goal refinement: a head-and-neck intensity modulated radiation therapy application.
Qi XS; Ruan D; Lee SP; Pham A; Kupelian P; Low DA; Steinberg M; Demarco J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Mar; 91(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 25752396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the feasibility of volumetric-modulated arc therapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-VMAT): An analysis for complex head-neck, high-risk prostate and rectal cancer cases.
Cilla S; Deodato F; Digesù C; Macchia G; Picardi V; Ferro M; Sallustio G; De Spirito M; Piermattei A; Morganti AG
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(1):108-16. PubMed ID: 24342167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Helical tomotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: dosimetric comparison with linear accelerator-based step-and-shoot IMRT.
Murthy V; Master Z; Gupta T; Ghosh-Laskar S; Budrukkar A; Phurailatpam R; Agarwal J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2010; 6(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 20622367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical experience transitioning from IMRT to VMAT for head and neck cancer.
Studenski MT; Bar-Ad V; Siglin J; Cognetti D; Curry J; Tuluc M; Harrison AS
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 23246253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single Arc Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy of head and neck cancer.
Bertelsen A; Hansen CR; Johansen J; Brink C
Radiother Oncol; 2010 May; 95(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 20188427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of several modulated radiotherapy techniques for head and neck cancer and dosimetric validation of VMAT.
Stieler F; Wolff D; Schmid H; Welzel G; Wenz F; Lohr F
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Dec; 101(3):388-93. PubMed ID: 21962821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison with TomoTherapy and step-and-shoot IMRT.
Lu SH; Cheng JC; Kuo SH; Lee JJ; Chen LH; Wu JK; Chen YH; Chen WY; Wen SY; Chong FC; Wu CJ; Wang CW
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Sep; 104(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 22236614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Volumetric arc intensity-modulated therapy for spine body radiotherapy: comparison with static intensity-modulated treatment.
Wu QJ; Yoo S; Kirkpatrick JP; Thongphiew D; Yin FF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Dec; 75(5):1596-604. PubMed ID: 19733447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rotational IMRT techniques compared to fixed gantry IMRT and tomotherapy: multi-institutional planning study for head-and-neck cases.
Wiezorek T; Brachwitz T; Georg D; Blank E; Fotina I; Habl G; Kretschmer M; Lutters G; Salz H; Schubert K; Wagner D; Wendt TG
Radiat Oncol; 2011 Feb; 6():20. PubMed ID: 21338501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Helical tomotherapy versus single-arc intensity-modulated arc therapy: a collaborative dosimetric comparison between two institutions.
Rong Y; Tang G; Welsh JS; Mohiuddin MM; Paliwal B; Yu CX
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Sep; 81(1):284-96. PubMed ID: 21236598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric comparison of hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for left-sided early breast cancer.
Lin JF; Yeh DC; Yeh HL; Chang CF; Lin JC
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 26116150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for carcinomas of the oro-pharynx, hypo-pharynx and larynx: a treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT.
Vanetti E; Clivio A; Nicolini G; Fogliata A; Ghosh-Laskar S; Agarwal JP; Upreti RR; Budrukkar A; Murthy V; Deshpande DD; Shrivastava SK; Dinshaw KA; Cozzi L
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jul; 92(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 19157609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative dosimetry of volumetric modulated arc therapy and limited-angle static intensity-modulated radiation therapy for early-stage larynx cancer.
Riegel AC; Antone J; Schwartz DL
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 22901745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A treatment planning study comparing Elekta VMAT and fixed field IMRT using the varian treatment planning system eclipse.
Peters S; Schiefer H; Plasswilm L
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jul; 9():153. PubMed ID: 25011529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A dosimetric comparison of the use of equally spaced beam (ESB), beam angle optimization (BAO), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in head and neck cancers treated by intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Leung WS; Wu VWC; Liu CYW; Cheng ACK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):121-130. PubMed ID: 31593367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tomotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer might increase bone marrow toxicity in comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Wang Y; Xiao Q; Zeng B; Ni Q; Liu X; Liu X; Tian L; Sheng C; Peng L; Wang H
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):e6-e12. PubMed ID: 31176536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, VMAT, fixed-field IMRT and 3D-conformal radiotherapy for stage I-II nasal natural killer T-cell lymphoma.
Liu X; Huang E; Wang Y; He Y; Luo H; Zhong M; Qiu D; Li C; Yang H; He G; Zhou J; Jin F
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Apr; 12(1):76. PubMed ID: 28449713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
