These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25114099)
1. Co-author responsibility: Distinguishing between the moral and epistemic aspects of trust. Andersen H EMBO Rep; 2014 Sep; 15(9):914-8. PubMed ID: 25114099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Science integrity has been never more important: It's all about trust. Behl C J Cell Biochem; 2021 Jul; 122(7):694-695. PubMed ID: 33559144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Scientific misconduct: a perspective from India. Sabir H; Kumbhare S; Parate A; Kumar R; Das S Med Health Care Philos; 2015 May; 18(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 25316327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The integrity of science - lost in translation? Kaiser M Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):339-47. PubMed ID: 24810194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Scientific misconduct and the National Advisory Board on Research Ethics]. Giertsen J Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Dec; 129(24):2582. PubMed ID: 20029551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. To tell or not to tell? The ethical dilemma of the would-be whistleblower. Malek J Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):115-29. PubMed ID: 20461568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific Misconduct. Gross C Annu Rev Psychol; 2016; 67():693-711. PubMed ID: 26273897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ambiguity, trust, and the responsible conduct of research. Grinnell F Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 11657858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The legacy of the Hwang case: research misconduct in biosciences. Kakuk P Sci Eng Ethics; 2009 Dec; 15(4):545-62. PubMed ID: 19247809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Canadian policy on reporting breaches of research integrity: When should Research Ethics Boards be informed? Page SA; Stalker MA Account Res; 2019 Oct; 26(7):460-471. PubMed ID: 31462108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Research ethics and scientific misconduct in biomedical research. Kansu E; Ruacan S Acta Neurochir Suppl; 2002; 83():11-5. PubMed ID: 12442615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Keeping a clean research environment: Addressing research misconduct and improving scientific integrity in China. Wang L; Liu Z Cancer Lett; 2019 Nov; 464():1-4. PubMed ID: 31430529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Promoting responsible conduct: striving for change rather than consensus. Commentary on "Ambiguity, trust, and the responsible conduct of research" (F. Grinnell). Zigmond MJ Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):219-28. PubMed ID: 11657860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Research Misconduct Policies: Rule or Person as a Model? Wiwanitkit V Account Res; 2016; 23(4):254-5. PubMed ID: 26649475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical aspects in medical publishing in Belgium. Moreels TG Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2018; 81(1):45-48. PubMed ID: 29562377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New Classification of Research Misconduct from the Viewpoint of Truth, Trust, and Risk. Kuroki T Account Res; 2018; 25(7-8):404-408. PubMed ID: 30427209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Plagiarism: A Shared Responsibility of All, Current Situation, and Future Actions in Yemen. Muthanna A Account Res; 2016; 23(5):280-7. PubMed ID: 26890365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]