153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25114415)
1. Complications after subpectoral biceps tenodesis using a dual suture anchor technique.
Abtahi AM; Granger EK; Tashjian RZ
Int J Shoulder Surg; 2014 Apr; 8(2):47-50. PubMed ID: 25114415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical Comparison of All-Suture Anchor Fixation and Interference Screw Technique for Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis.
Chiang FL; Hong CK; Chang CH; Lin CL; Jou IM; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2016 Jul; 32(7):1247-52. PubMed ID: 27039966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical Comparison of Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Onlay Techniques.
Lacheta L; Rosenberg SI; Brady AW; Dornan GJ; Millett PJ
Orthop J Sports Med; 2019 Oct; 7(10):2325967119876276. PubMed ID: 31663008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: dual suture anchor versus interference screw fixation.
Tashjian RZ; Henninger HB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Oct; 22(10):1408-12. PubMed ID: 23415819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interference screw vs. suture anchor fixation for open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: does it matter?
Millett PJ; Sanders B; Gobezie R; Braun S; Warner JJ
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2008 Sep; 9():121. PubMed ID: 18793424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and sonographic evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis with a dual suture anchor technique demonstrates improved outcomes and a low failure rate at a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Jacxsens M; Granger EK; Tashjian RZ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Jan; 138(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 29038845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interference screw versus suture anchor fixation for subpectoral tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon: a cadaveric study.
Golish SR; Caldwell PE; Miller MD; Singanamala N; Ranawat AS; Treme G; Pearson SE; Costic R; Sekiya JK
Arthroscopy; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1103-8. PubMed ID: 19028161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical evaluation of open suture anchor fixation versus interference screw for biceps tenodesis.
Papp DF; Skelley NW; Sutter EG; Ji JH; Wierks CH; Belkoff SM; McFarland EG
Orthopedics; 2011 Jul; 34(7):e275-8. PubMed ID: 21717988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary cortical button fixation and interference screw technique for subpectoral biceps tenodesis.
Buchholz A; Martetschläger F; Siebenlist S; Sandmann GH; Hapfelmeier A; Lenich A; Millett PJ; Stöckle U; Elser F
Arthroscopy; 2013 May; 29(5):845-53. PubMed ID: 23587927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Radiostereometric Analysis of Tendon Migration After Arthroscopic and Mini-Open Biceps Tenodesis: Interference Screw Versus Single Suture Anchor Fixation.
Forsythe B; Patel HH; Berlinberg EJ; Forlenza EM; Okoroha KR; Williams BT; Yanke AB; Cole BJ; Verma NN
Am J Sports Med; 2023 Sep; 51(11):2869-2880. PubMed ID: 37548005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Double on-lay fixation using all suture-type anchor for subpectoral biceps tenodesis has favorable functional outcomes and leads to less cosmetic deformities than single on-lay fixation.
Rhee SM; Jeong HY; Ro K; Pancholi S; Rhee YG
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Dec; 27(12):4005-4013. PubMed ID: 31410527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are Implant Choice and Surgical Approach Associated With Biceps Tenodesis Construct Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-regression.
Aida HF; Shi BY; Huish EG; McFarland EG; Srikumaran U
Am J Sports Med; 2020 Apr; 48(5):1273-1280. PubMed ID: 31585053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A biomechanical analysis of two biceps tenodesis fixation techniques.
Richards DP; Burkhart SS
Arthroscopy; 2005 Jul; 21(7):861-6. PubMed ID: 16012500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliable Clinical and Sonographic Outcomes of Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using an All-Suture Anchor Onlay Technique.
Degenhardt H; Pogorzelski J; Themessl A; Muench LN; Wechselberger J; Woertler K; Siebenlist S; Imhoff AB; Scheiderer B
Arthroscopy; 2022 Mar; 38(3):729-734. PubMed ID: 34508820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: a biomechanical comparison of a new "soft anchor" tenodesis technique versus interference screw biceps tendon fixation.
Baleani M; Francesconi D; Zani L; Giannini S; Snyder SJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Feb; 30(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 25533271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mini-open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using All-Suture Anchor.
Gifford A; Tauro T; Haunschild E; Okoroha K; Cole BJ
Arthrosc Tech; 2020 Apr; 9(4):e445-e451. PubMed ID: 32368463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical properties of suprapectoral biceps tenodesis with double-anchor knotless luggage tag sutures vs. subpectoral biceps tenodesis with single-anchor whipstitch suture using all-suture anchors.
Nicolay RW; Jahandar A; Retzky JS; Kontaxis A; Verma NN; Fu MC
JSES Int; 2023 Nov; 7(6):2393-2399. PubMed ID: 37969507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of Primary Biceps Subpectoral Tenodesis in an Active Population: A Prospective Evaluation of 101 Patients.
Provencher MT; McCormick F; Peebles LA; Beaulieu-Jones BR; Dekker TJ; LeClere LE; Anthony S; Solomon DJ; Golijanin P; Dewing C
Arthroscopy; 2019 Dec; 35(12):3205-3210. PubMed ID: 31785747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chronic rupture of the long head of the biceps tendon: comparison of 2-year results following primary versus revision open subpectoral biceps tenodesis.
Euler SA; Horan MP; Ellman MB; Greenspoon JA; Millett PJ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 May; 136(5):657-63. PubMed ID: 26810192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Low incidence of failure after proximal biceps tenodesis with unicortical suture button.
Cook JB; Sedory DM; Freidl MC; Adams DR
J Orthop; 2017 Sep; 14(3):384-389. PubMed ID: 28701853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
