140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25114501)
21. Optomap ultrawide field imaging for detecting peripheral retinal lesions in 1725 high myopic eyes before implantable collamer lens surgery.
Yang D; Li M; Wei R; Xu Y; Shang J; Zhou X
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Sep; 48(7):895-902. PubMed ID: 32510801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in Trang province determined by retinal photography and comprehensive eye examination.
Supapluksakul S; Ruamviboonsuk P; Chaowakul W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):716-22. PubMed ID: 18672638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Peripheral lesions identified by mydriatic ultrawide field imaging: distribution and potential impact on diabetic retinopathy severity.
Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Soliman AZ; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
Ophthalmology; 2013 Dec; 120(12):2587-2595. PubMed ID: 23778092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Is screening with digital imaging using one retinal view adequate?
Herbert HM; Jordan K; Flanagan DW
Eye (Lond); 2003 May; 17(4):497-500. PubMed ID: 12802350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical biomicroscopy versus fluorescein angiography: effectiveness and sensitivity in detecting diabetic retinopathy.
Khalaf SS; Al-Bdour MD; Al-Till MI
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 17294387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of smartphone ophthalmoscopy with slit-lamp biomicroscopy for grading diabetic retinopathy.
Russo A; Morescalchi F; Costagliola C; Delcassi L; Semeraro F
Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Feb; 159(2):360-4.e1. PubMed ID: 25447109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Application of mydriasis and eye steering in ultrawide field imaging for detecting peripheral retinal lesions in myopic patients.
Li M; Yang D; Shen Y; Shang J; Niu L; Yu Y; Wang X; Yao P; Zhou X
Br J Ophthalmol; 2023 Jul; 107(7):1018-1024. PubMed ID: 35241443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Wide-field imaging and OCT vs clinical evaluation of patients referred from diabetic retinopathy screening.
Manjunath V; Papastavrou V; Steel DH; Menon G; Taylor R; Peto T; Talks J
Eye (Lond); 2015 Mar; 29(3):416-23. PubMed ID: 25592127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Distribution of peripheral lesions identified by mydriatic ultra-wide field fundus imaging in diabetic retinopathy.
Verma A; Alagorie AR; Ramasamy K; van Hemert J; Yadav NK; Pappuru RR; Tufail A; Nittala MG; Sadda SR; Raman R;
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 258(4):725-733. PubMed ID: 31989286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sensitivity and Specificity of Ultrawide-Field Fundus Photography for the Staging of Sickle Cell Retinopathy in Real-Life Practice at Varying Expertise Level.
Bunod R; Mouallem-Beziere A; Amoroso F; Capuano V; Bitton K; Kamami-Levy C; Jung C; Souied EH; Miere A
J Clin Med; 2019 Oct; 8(10):. PubMed ID: 31614597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Software for reading and grading diabetic retinopathy: Aravind Diabetic Retinopathy Screening 3.0.
Perumalsamy N; Prasad NM; Sathya S; Ramasamy K
Diabetes Care; 2007 Sep; 30(9):2302-6. PubMed ID: 17507695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ultra-wide field imaging system and traditional retinal examinations for screening fundus changes after cataract surgery.
Peng J; Zhang Q; Jin HY; Lu WY; Zhao PQ
Int J Ophthalmol; 2016; 9(9):1299-303. PubMed ID: 27672595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Retinal ultra-wide-field colour imaging versus dilated fundus examination to screen for sickle cell retinopathy.
Alabduljalil T; Cheung CS; VandenHoven C; Mackeen LD; Kirby-Allen M; Kertes PJ; Lam WC
Br J Ophthalmol; 2021 Aug; 105(8):1121-1126. PubMed ID: 32816790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sensitivity and Specificity of Smartphone-Based Retinal Imaging for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Comparative Study.
Sengupta S; Sindal MD; Baskaran P; Pan U; Venkatesh R
Ophthalmol Retina; 2019 Feb; 3(2):146-153. PubMed ID: 31014763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical study of venous abnormalities in diabetic retinopathy.
Sato Y; Kamata A; Matsui M
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1993; 37(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 8230837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Detection of diabetic retinopathy: a comparison between red-free digital images and colour transparencies.
von Wendt G; Summanen P; Hallnäs K; Algvere P; Heikkilä K; Seregard S
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 243(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 15729542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic accuracy of diabetic retinopathy grading by an artificial intelligence-enabled algorithm compared with a human standard for wide-field true-colour confocal scanning and standard digital retinal images.
Olvera-Barrios A; Heeren TF; Balaskas K; Chambers R; Bolter L; Egan C; Tufail A; Anderson J
Br J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 105(2):265-270. PubMed ID: 32376611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Muranga Teleophthalmology Study: A Comparison of Virtual (Teleretina) Assessment with in-person Clinical Examination to Diagnose Diabetic Retinopathy and Age-related Macular Degeneration in Kenya.
Nanji K; Kherani IN; Damji KF; Nyenze M; Kiage D; Tennant MT
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2020; 27(2):91-99. PubMed ID: 32874041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy and reliability of retinal photo grading for diabetic retinopathy: Remote graders from a developing country and standard retinal photo grader in Australia.
Islam FMA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179310. PubMed ID: 28632764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Light and portable novel device for diabetic retinopathy screening.
Ting DS; Tay-Kearney ML; Kanagasingam Y
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(1):e40-6. PubMed ID: 22044677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
