These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25114544)

  • 1. MR Spectroscopic Imaging of Peripheral Zone in Prostate Cancer Using a 3T MRI Scanner: Endorectal versus External Phased Array Coils.
    Nagarajan R; Margolis DJ; Raman SS; Ouellette D; Sarma MK; Reiter RE; Thomas MA
    Magn Reson Insights; 2013; 6():51-8. PubMed ID: 25114544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with and without an endorectal coil: a prostate phantom study.
    Ma C; Chen L; Scheenen TW; Lu J; Wang J
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1342-9. PubMed ID: 25348479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging.
    Fütterer JJ; Engelbrecht MR; Jager GJ; Hartman RP; King BF; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Apr; 17(4):1055-65. PubMed ID: 17024497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combined morphological, [1H]-MR spectroscopic and contrast-enhanced imaging of human prostate cancer with a 3-Tesla scanner: preliminary experience.
    Carlani M; Mancino S; Bonanno E; Finazzi Agrò E; Simonetti G
    Radiol Med; 2008 Aug; 113(5):670-88. PubMed ID: 18493829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. (31) P MR spectroscopic imaging combined with (1) H MR spectroscopic imaging in the human prostate using a double tuned endorectal coil at 7T.
    Luttje MP; Italiaander MG; Arteaga de Castro CS; van der Kemp WJ; Luijten PR; van Vulpen M; van der Heide UA; Klomp DW
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Dec; 72(6):1516-21. PubMed ID: 24357271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of pelvic phased-array versus endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla for local staging of prostate cancer.
    Kim BS; Kim TH; Kwon TG; Yoo ES
    Yonsei Med J; 2012 May; 53(3):550-6. PubMed ID: 22476999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3D proton MR spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer using a standard spine coil at 1.5 T in clinical routine: a feasibility study.
    Lichy MP; Pintaske J; Kottke R; Machann J; Anastasiadis A; Roell S; Hennenlotter J; Diergarten T; Schick F; Stenzl A; Claussen CD; Schlemmer HP
    Eur Radiol; 2005 Apr; 15(4):653-60. PubMed ID: 15627193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proton two-dimensional chemical shift imaging for evaluation of prostate cancer: external surface coil vs. endorectal surface coil.
    Kaji Y; Wada A; Imaoka I; Matsuo M; Terachi T; Kobashi Y; Sugimura K; Fujii M; Maruyama K; Takizawa O
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Dec; 16(6):697-706. PubMed ID: 12451583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 1H-MRSI of prostate cancer: the relationship between metabolite ratio and tumor proliferation.
    Wang XZ; Wang B; Gao ZQ; Liu JG; Liu ZQ; Niu QL; Sun ZK; Yuan YX
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 19070978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging of the in situ human prostate with high (0.24-0.7-cm3) spatial resolution.
    Kurhanewicz J; Vigneron DB; Hricak H; Narayan P; Carroll P; Nelson SJ
    Radiology; 1996 Mar; 198(3):795-805. PubMed ID: 8628874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T.
    Lewis S; Ganti A; Argiriadi P; Rosen A; Hectors S; Semaan S; Song C; Peti S; Segall M; George K; Jaikaran V; Villa S; Kestenbaum D; Voutsinas N; Doucette J; Tewari A; Rastinehad AR; Taouli B
    Cancer Imaging; 2022 Mar; 22(1):15. PubMed ID: 35296357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging.
    Lee SH; Park KK; Choi KH; Lim BJ; Kim JH; Lee SW; Chung BH
    World J Urol; 2010 Dec; 28(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 20623288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of prostate voxels identified as suspicious of malignancy on three-dimensional (1)H MR spectroscopic imaging in patients with abnormal digital rectal examination or raised prostate specific antigen level of 4-10 ng/ml.
    Kumar V; Jagannathan NR; Kumar R; Thulkar S; Gupta SD; Hemal AK; Gupta NP
    NMR Biomed; 2007 Feb; 20(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 16894640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A multitransmit external body array combined with a
    Philips BWJ; van Uden MJ; Rietsch SHG; Orzada S; Scheenen TWJ
    Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3893-3905. PubMed ID: 31274201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-Quality 3-Dimensional 1H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging of the Prostate Without Endorectal Receive Coil Using A Semi-LASER Sequence.
    Tayari N; Steinseifer IK; Selnæs KM; Bathen TF; Maas MC; Heerschap A
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Oct; 52(10):640-646. PubMed ID: 28632688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging at 3 T with an endorectal coil.
    Kobus T; Hambrock T; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Wright AJ; Barentsz JO; Heerschap A; Scheenen TW
    Eur Urol; 2011 Nov; 60(5):1074-80. PubMed ID: 21419565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prostate MRI: Is Endorectal Coil Necessary?-A Review.
    Lee G; Oto A; Giurcanu M
    Life (Basel); 2022 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 35455060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phased-array MRI of canine prostate using endorectal and endourethral coils.
    Yung AC; Oner AY; Serfaty JM; Feneley M; Yang X; Atalar E
    Magn Reson Med; 2003 Apr; 49(4):710-5. PubMed ID: 12652542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging.
    Beyersdorff D; Taymoorian K; Knösel T; Schnorr D; Felix R; Hamm B; Bruhn H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1214-20. PubMed ID: 16247137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of prostate cancer with MR spectroscopic imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 Tesla.
    Mazaheri Y; Shukla-Dave A; Goldman DA; Moskowitz CS; Takeda T; Reuter VE; Akin O; Hricak H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jan; 55():93-102. PubMed ID: 30176373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.