These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25116248)

  • 1. Expectancy effects during response selection modulate attentional selection and inhibitory control networks.
    Chmielewski WX; Mückschel M; Roessner V; Beste C
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Nov; 274():53-61. PubMed ID: 25116248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anticipating conflict facilitates controlled stimulus-response selection.
    Correa A; Rao A; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1461-72. PubMed ID: 18823248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Context modulates early stimulus processing when resolving stimulus-response conflict.
    Scerif G; Worden MS; Davidson M; Seiger L; Casey BJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):781-92. PubMed ID: 16768377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task.
    Tian Y; Yao D
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 18524452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stress intensifies demands on response selection during action cascading processes.
    Yildiz A; Wolf OT; Beste C
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2014 Apr; 42():178-87. PubMed ID: 24636514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ad-hoc and context-dependent adjustments of selective attention in conflict control: an ERP study with visual probes.
    Nigbur R; Schneider J; Sommer W; Dimigen O; Stürmer B
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 107():76-84. PubMed ID: 25482266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. It's the Other Way Around! Early Modulation of Sensory Distractor Processing Induced by Late Response Conflict.
    Pastötter B; Frings C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jul; 30(7):985-998. PubMed ID: 29668394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of extrinsic motivation on competition-based selection.
    Sänger J; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 224(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 21645552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus-response compatibility in Huntington's disease: a cognitive-neurophysiological analysis.
    Beste C; Saft C; Andrich J; Gold R; Falkenstein M
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 99(3):1213-23. PubMed ID: 18184888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subprocesses of performance monitoring: a dissociation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs.
    Ullsperger M; von Cramon DY
    Neuroimage; 2001 Dec; 14(6):1387-401. PubMed ID: 11707094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural correlates of stimulus and response interference in a 2-1 mapping stroop task.
    Chen A; Bailey K; Tiernan BN; West R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 May; 80(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 21356252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transition from reactive control to proactive control across conflict adaptation: An sLORETA study.
    Suzuki K; Shinoda H
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Nov; 100():7-14. PubMed ID: 26432378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sequential modulation of (bottom-up) response activation and inhibition in a response conflict task: a single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
    Treccani B; Cona G; Milanese N; Umiltà C
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jul; 82(4):771-786. PubMed ID: 28393259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neurophysiological markers of alert responding during goal-directed behavior: a high-density electrical mapping study.
    Dockree PM; Kelly SP; Robertson IH; Reilly RB; Foxe JJ
    Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):587-601. PubMed ID: 16024257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. N1 and N2 ERPs reflect the regulation of automatic approach tendencies to positive stimuli.
    Ernst LH; Ehlis AC; Dresler T; Tupak SV; Weidner A; Fallgatter AJ
    Neurosci Res; 2013 Mar; 75(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 23298530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of stimulus-response compatibility on inhibitory processes in Parkinson's disease.
    Beste C; Dziobek I; Hielscher H; Willemssen R; Falkenstein M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 29(4):855-60. PubMed ID: 19200076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subliminal priming of actions influences sense of control over effects of action.
    Wenke D; Fleming SM; Haggard P
    Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 19945697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. N2pc is modulated by stimulus-stimulus, but not by stimulus-response incompatibilities.
    Cespón J; Galdo-Álvarez S; Díaz F
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Apr; 93(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 23380335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accessory stimuli affect the emergence of conflict, not conflict control.
    Böckler A; Alpay G; Stürmer B
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 20494861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.