101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25116727)
1. Optimising retention through multiple study opportunities over days: The benefit of an expanding schedule of repetitions.
Gerbier E; Toppino TC; Koenig O
Memory; 2015; 23(6):943-54. PubMed ID: 25116727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing.
Karpicke JD; Bauernschmidt A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1250-7. PubMed ID: 21574747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Level of initial training moderates the effects of distributing practice over multiple days with expanding, contracting, and uniform schedules: Evidence for study-phase retrieval.
Toppino TC; Phelan HA; Gerbier E
Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):969-978. PubMed ID: 29728945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of multiple-day temporal distribution of repetitions on memory: a comparison of uniform, expanding, and contracting schedules.
Gerbier E; Koenig O
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):514-25. PubMed ID: 21895560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Expanded vs. equal interval spaced retrieval practice: exploring different schedules of spacing and retention interval in younger and older adults.
Logan JM; Balota DA
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2008 May; 15(3):257-80. PubMed ID: 18421627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention.
Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):704-19. PubMed ID: 17576148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contracting, equal, and expanding learning schedules: the optimal distribution of learning sessions depends on retention interval.
Küpper-Tetzel CE; Kapler IV; Wiseheart M
Mem Cognit; 2014 Jul; 42(5):729-41. PubMed ID: 24500777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of uniform versus expanding retrieval practice on the recall of physiology information.
Dobson JL
Adv Physiol Educ; 2012 Mar; 36(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 22383406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals.
Rowland CA; DeLosh EL
Memory; 2015; 23(3):403-19. PubMed ID: 24579674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of adjusted spaced retrieval versus a uniform expanded retrieval schedule for learning a name-face association in older adults with probable Alzheimer's disease.
Hawley KS; Cherry KE; Boudreaux EO; Jackson EM
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2008 Aug; 30(6):639-49. PubMed ID: 18612874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrieval practice and spacing effects in young and older adults: An examination of the benefits of desirable difficulty.
Maddox GB; Balota DA
Mem Cognit; 2015 Jul; 43(5):760-74. PubMed ID: 25616776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The contributions of encoding, retention, and recall to the Hebb effect.
Oberauer K; Meyer N
Memory; 2009 Oct; 17(7):774-81. PubMed ID: 19598058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Different rates of forgetting following study versus test trials.
Wheeler MA; Ewers M; Buonanno JF
Memory; 2003 Nov; 11(6):571-80. PubMed ID: 14982124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the efficacy of two name-learning techniques: expanding rehearsal and name-face imagery.
Neuschatz JS; Preston EL; Toglia MP; Neuschatz JS
Am J Psychol; 2005; 118(1):79-101. PubMed ID: 15822611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does mediator use contribute to the spacing effect for cued recall? Critical tests of the mediator hypothesis.
Morehead K; Dunlosky J; Rawson KA; Bishop M; Pyc MA
Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):535-546. PubMed ID: 28978279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Self-controlled KR schedules: does repetition order matter?
Patterson JT; Carter MJ; Hansen S
Hum Mov Sci; 2013 Aug; 32(4):567-79. PubMed ID: 24054895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: how much is enough?
Rawson KA; Dunlosky J
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Aug; 140(3):283-302. PubMed ID: 21707204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials?
Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
Mem Cognit; 2010 Jan; 38(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 19966244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term spacing effect benefits in developmental amnesia: case experiments in rehabilitation.
Green JL; Weston T; Wiseheart M; Rosenbaum RS
Neuropsychology; 2014 Sep; 28(5):685-94. PubMed ID: 24749729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Encoding, maintenance, and retrieval processes in the lag effect: a multinomial processing tree analysis.
Küpper-Tetzel CE; Erdfelder E
Memory; 2012; 20(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 22171809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
