These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25117090)

  • 1. The role of mnemonic processes in pure-target and pure-foil recognition memory.
    Koop GJ; Criss AH; Malmberg KJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):509-16. PubMed ID: 25117090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Irrelevant background context decreases mnemonic discrimination and increases false memory.
    Racsmány M; Bencze D; Pajkossy P; Szőllősi Á; Marián M
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6204. PubMed ID: 33737589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Release from output interference in recognition memory: A test of the attention hypothesis.
    Criss AH; Salomão C; Malmberg KJ; Aue W; Kılıç A; Claridge M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 May; 71(5):1081-1089. PubMed ID: 28351212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociative effects of orthographic distinctiveness in pure and mixed lists: an item-order account.
    McDaniel MA; Cahill M; Bugg JM; Meadow NG
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1162-73. PubMed ID: 21584853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Serial recall, word frequency, and mixed lists: the influence of item arrangement.
    Miller LM; Roodenrys S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1731-40. PubMed ID: 22582964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic memory searches: Selective output interference for the memory of facts.
    Aue WR; Criss AH; Prince MA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1798-806. PubMed ID: 25911444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Instability in memory phenomena: a common puzzle and a unifying explanation.
    McDaniel MA; Bugg JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Apr; 15(2):237-55. PubMed ID: 18488637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of list composition and perceptual fluency on judgments of learning (JOLs).
    Susser JA; Mulligan NW; Besken M
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Oct; 41(7):1000-11. PubMed ID: 23661189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Memory for target height is scaled to observer height.
    Twedt E; Crawford LE; Proffitt DR
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):339-51. PubMed ID: 22144130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The mnemonic effects of recall on immediate retention.
    Nairne JS; Ceo DA; Reysen MB
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jan; 35(1):191-9. PubMed ID: 17533892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of mediated word lists on false recall and recognition.
    Huff MJ; Hutchison KA
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Aug; 39(6):941-53. PubMed ID: 21336675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing effects in mixed- versus pure-list designs.
    Rowland CA; Littrell-Baez MK; Sensenig AE; DeLosh EL
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):912-21. PubMed ID: 24619791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of increasing similar interfering experiences on mnemonic discrimination: Electrophysiological evidence.
    Poch C; Prieto A; Hinojosa JA; Campo P
    Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 10(3):129-138. PubMed ID: 30663508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The generation effect and experimental design.
    Mulligan NW; Smith SA; Buchin ZL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1422-1431. PubMed ID: 30284868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall.
    Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):838-49. PubMed ID: 14516217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Which factors influence number updating in working memory? The effects of size distance and suppression.
    Carretti B; Cornoldi C; Pelegrina SL
    Br J Psychol; 2007 Feb; 98(Pt 1):45-60. PubMed ID: 17319050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory and visual spatial working memory.
    Lehnert G; Zimmer HD
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1080-90. PubMed ID: 17128606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing a Strategy-Disruption Account of the List-Strength Effect.
    Ensor TM; Bancroft TD; Guitard D; Bireta TJ; Hockley WE; Surprenant AM
    Exp Psychol; 2020 Jul; 67(4):255-275. PubMed ID: 33111659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the basis of the between-group production effect in recognition.
    Taikh A; Bodner GE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 27244360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image detail and recall: evidence for within-item elaboration.
    Ritchey GH; Beal CR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Jan; 6(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 7373244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.