These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25117364)

  • 1. Comparative study of DNA extraction methodologies from goat sperm and its effects on polymerase chain reaction analysis.
    Silva EC; Pelinca MA; Acosta AC; Silva DM; Gomes Filho MA; Guerra MM
    Genet Mol Res; 2014 Aug; 13(3):6070-8. PubMed ID: 25117364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material.
    Walsh PS; Metzger DA; Higuchi R
    Biotechniques; 1991 Apr; 10(4):506-13. PubMed ID: 1867860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of storage temperature on the quantity and integrity of genomic DNA extracted from mice tissues: A comparison of recovery methods.
    Al-Griw HH; Zraba ZA; Al-Muntaser SK; Draid MM; Zaidi AM; Tabagh RM; Al-Griw MA
    Open Vet J; 2017; 7(3):239-243. PubMed ID: 28884076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Estimating the efficiency of DNA isolation methods in semen, blood and saliva stains using the QuantiBlot system].
    Prośniak A; Gloc E; Berent J; Babol-Pokora K; Jacewicz R; Szram S
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2006; 56(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 16708611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of methods for high quantity and quality genomic DNA extraction from raw cow milk.
    Usman T; Yu Y; Liu C; Fan Z; Wang Y
    Genet Mol Res; 2014 Apr; 13(2):3319-28. PubMed ID: 24841664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative evaluation of four DNA extraction protocols from whole blood sample.
    Ghaheri M; Kahrizi D; Yari K; Babaie A; Suthar RS; Kazemi E
    Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2016 Mar; 62(3):120-4. PubMed ID: 27064884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Preparation of DNA from Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts for PCR detection].
    Shen YJ; Cao JP; Lu WY; Li XH; Liu HP; Xu YX; Zhou XN; Tang LH; Liu SX
    Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 23(4):228-30. PubMed ID: 16296614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of three different techniques of human sperm DNA isolation for methylation assay.
    Yuan HF; Kuete M; Su L; Yang F; Hu ZY; Tian BZ; Zhang HP; Zhao K
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2015 Dec; 35(6):938-942. PubMed ID: 26670450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of DNA extraction methods suitable for PCR-based detection and genotyping of Clostridium botulinum.
    Auricchio B; Anniballi F; Fiore A; Skiby JE; De Medici D
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2013 Sep; 11 Suppl 1():S200-6. PubMed ID: 23971807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparing and evaluating six methods of extracting human genomic DNA from whole blood].
    Chang JJ; Zhang SH; Li L
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 25(2):109-11, 114. PubMed ID: 19537249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standardization of DNA extraction from sand flies: Application to genotyping by next generation sequencing.
    Casaril AE; de Oliveira LP; Alonso DP; de Oliveira EF; Gomes Barrios SP; de Oliveira Moura Infran J; Fernandes WS; Oshiro ET; Ferreira AMT; Ribolla PEM; de Oliveira AG
    Exp Parasitol; 2017 Jun; 177():66-72. PubMed ID: 28456690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for polymerase chain reaction amplification of guanaco (Lama guanicoe) fecal DNA samples.
    Espinosa MI; Bertin A; Squeo FA; Cortés A; Gouin N
    Genet Mol Res; 2015 Jan; 14(1):400-6. PubMed ID: 25729972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Analysis of different methods of extracting DNA from paraffin-embedded tissues and the application of nest PCR].
    Yan L; Sun B; Zhao X; Liu Z; Song W
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 28(4):795-9. PubMed ID: 21936383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the quality and quantity of genomic DNA recovered from canine blood samples by three different extraction methods.
    Clements DN; Wood S; Carter SD; Ollier WE
    Res Vet Sci; 2008 Aug; 85(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 18031774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficiency evaluation of a DNA extraction and purification protocol on archival formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue.
    Farrugia A; Keyser C; Ludes B
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Jan; 194(1-3):e25-8. PubMed ID: 19781880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High salt method: a simple and rapid procedure for isolation of genomic DNA from buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) white blood cells.
    Aravindakshan TV; Nainar AM; Nachimuthu K
    Indian J Exp Biol; 1997 Aug; 35(8):903-5. PubMed ID: 9475068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of three methods for effective extraction of DNA from human hair.
    Suenaga E; Nakamura H
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2005 Jun; 820(1):137-41. PubMed ID: 15866502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simple and rapid PCR-based method for ostrich sexing using micro amounts of DNA.
    Huang CW; Huang MC
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2008 Dec; 43(6):643-6. PubMed ID: 18954377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Rapid DNA extraction from archival paraffin-embedded tissue: a modified method available to PCR analysis for diagnostic pathology].
    Jiang W; Liu WP; Li L; Li GD
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2007 Jul; 38(4):709-12. PubMed ID: 17718448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A sort of meliorative method for testing DNA from sperm smear].
    Sun YD; Ren H; Chen YY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004; 20(4):202-4. PubMed ID: 15751653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.