BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25118557)

  • 1. Results of a pilot programme of mammographic breast cancer screening in the Western Cape.
    Apffelstaedt JP; Hattingh R; Baatjes K; Wessels N
    S Afr Med J; 2014 Apr; 104(4):297-8. PubMed ID: 25118557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic screening for breast cancer in a resource-restricted environment.
    Apffelstaedt SP; Dalmayer L; Baatjes K
    S Afr Med J; 2014 Apr; 104(4):294-6. PubMed ID: 25118556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgeon-read screening mammography: an analysis of 11,948 examinations.
    Apffelstaedt JP; Steenkamp V; Baatjes KJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Oct; 17 Suppl 3():249-54. PubMed ID: 20853042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of a subsidised mammographic screening programme in Malaysia, a middle-income Asian country.
    Lee M; Mariapun S; Rajaram N; Teo SH; Yip CH
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Jan; 17(1):127. PubMed ID: 28129762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Audit of mammography requests in Abakaliki, South-East Nigeria.
    Eni UE; Ekwedigwe KC; Sunday-Adeoye I; Daniyan A; Isikhuemen ME
    World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 15(1):56. PubMed ID: 28270153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance data of screening mammography at a dedicated breast health centre.
    Apffelstaedt JP; Steenkamp V; Baatjes K
    S Afr Med J; 2008 Dec; 98(12):950-3. PubMed ID: 19374072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time for a re-evaluation of mammography in the young? Results of an audit of mammography in women younger than 40 in a resource restricted environment.
    Taylor L; Basro S; Apffelstaedt JP; Baatjes K
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Aug; 129(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 21698411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
    Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved Performance of Adjunctive Ultrasonography After Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer Among Chinese Females.
    Dong H; Huang Y; Song F; Dai H; Liu P; Zhu Y; Wang P; Han J; Hao X; Chen K
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Jun; 18(3):e353-e361. PubMed ID: 28887010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interval breast cancers: absolute and proportional incidence and blinded review in a community mammographic screening program.
    Carbonaro LA; Azzarone A; Paskeh BB; Brambilla G; Brunelli S; Calori A; Caumo F; Malerba P; Menicagli L; Sconfienza LM; Vadalà G; Brambilla G; Fantini L; Ciatto S; Sardanelli F
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):e84-91. PubMed ID: 24369953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography performance in Oman: Review of factors influencing cancer yield and positive predictive value.
    Taif S; Tufail F; Alnuaimi AS
    Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 12(2):e250-8. PubMed ID: 24673798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI.
    Vreemann S; van Zelst JCM; Schlooz-Vries M; Bult P; Hoogerbrugge N; Karssemeijer N; Gubern-Mérida A; Mann RM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Aug; 20(1):84. PubMed ID: 30075794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Opportunistic mammography screening provides effective detection rates in a limited resource healthcare system.
    Teh YC; Tan GH; Taib NA; Rahmat K; Westerhout CJ; Fadzli F; See MH; Jamaris S; Yip CH
    BMC Cancer; 2015 May; 15():405. PubMed ID: 25972043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.
    Mandelson MT; Oestreicher N; Porter PL; White D; Finder CA; Taplin SH; White E
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Jul; 92(13):1081-7. PubMed ID: 10880551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can the synthetic C view images be used in isolation for diagnosing breast malignancy without reviewing the entire digital breast tomosynthesis data set?
    Murphy MC; Coffey L; O'Neill AC; Quinn C; Prichard R; McNally S
    Ir J Med Sci; 2018 Nov; 187(4):1077-1081. PubMed ID: 29427198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changing emphasis in breast diagnosis: the surgeon's role in evaluating mammographic abnormalities.
    Sterns EE
    J Am Coll Surg; 1997 Mar; 184(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 9060928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammographic screening in women at increased risk of breast cancer after treatment of Hodgkin's disease.
    Kwong A; Hancock SL; Bloom JR; Pal S; Birdwell RL; Mariscal C; Ikeda DM
    Breast J; 2008; 14(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18186864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.