These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25119320)

  • 21. Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom.
    Rapp-Bernhardt U; Bernhardt TM; Lenzen H; Esseling R; Roehl FW; Schiborr M; Theobald-Hormann I; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 16170012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Metz S; Damoser P; Hollweck R; Roggel R; Engelke C; Woertler K; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ultralow-dose CT with tin filtration for detection of solid and sub solid pulmonary nodules: a phantom study.
    Martini K; Higashigaito K; Barth BK; Baumueller S; Alkadhi H; Frauenfelder T
    Br J Radiol; 2015; 88(1056):20150389. PubMed ID: 26492317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Correlation of contrast-detail analysis and clinical image quality assessment in chest radiography with a human cadaver study.
    De Crop A; Bacher K; Van Hoof T; Smeets PV; Smet BS; Vergauwen M; Kiendys U; Duyck P; Verstraete K; D'Herde K; Thierens H
    Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):298-304. PubMed ID: 22056687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Direct detector radiography versus dual reading computed radiography: feasibility of dose reduction in chest radiography.
    Gruber M; Uffmann M; Weber M; Prokop M; Balassy C; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Jul; 16(7):1544-50. PubMed ID: 16404566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Vereecken L; De Hauwere A; Duyck P; De Man R; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):630-7. PubMed ID: 16928923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Development of a digital chest phantom for studies on energy subtraction techniques].
    Hayashi N; Taniguchi A; Noto K; Shimosegawa M; Ogura T; Doi K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Mar; 70(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 24647055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A; Sjöström D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Synthetic CT: simulating low dose single and dual energy protocols from a dual energy scan.
    Wang AS; Pelc NJ
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5551-62. PubMed ID: 21992373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Image quality and dose differences caused by vendor-specific image processing of neonatal radiographs.
    Sensakovic WF; O'Dell MC; Letter H; Kohler N; Rop B; Cook J; Logsdon G; Varich L
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Oct; 46(11):1606-13. PubMed ID: 27488507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging.
    Gislason AJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR
    Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 21089760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Detectability of lung nodules using flat panel detector with dual energy subtraction by two shot method: evaluation by ROC method.
    Tagashira H; Arakawa K; Yoshimoto M; Mochizuki T; Murase K
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Nov; 64(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 17386991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automatic quantitative low contrast analysis of digital chest phantom radiographs.
    Kwan AL; Filipow LJ; Le LH
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 12674230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Optimization of the chest exposure condition with a contrast-detail phantom: evaluation of the flat-panel versus computed radiography systems].
    Kinoshita E; Umezu Y; Ogawa K; Katou T; Arimura H; Yoshikawa H; Higashida Y; Ooki M; Toyofuku F
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jul; 60(7):969-74. PubMed ID: 15340278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optimization of a flat-panel based real time dual-energy system for cardiac imaging.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1562-8. PubMed ID: 16872063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of pulmonary nodules and infection on chest CT with radiation dose equivalent to chest radiography: Prospective intra-individual comparison study to standard dose CT.
    Martini K; Barth BK; Nguyen-Kim TD; Baumueller S; Alkadhi H; Frauenfelder T
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Feb; 85(2):360-5. PubMed ID: 26781141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Feasibility of real time dual-energy imaging based on a flat panel detector for coronary artery calcium quantification.
    Xu T; Ducote JL; Wong JT; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1612-22. PubMed ID: 16872069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An optimisation strategy in a digital environment applied to neonatal chest imaging.
    Hansson J; Båth M; Håkansson M; Grundin H; Bjurklint E; Orvestad P; Kjellström A; Boström H; Jönsson M; Jonsson K; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):278-85. PubMed ID: 15933122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.