These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25120078)

  • 1. Use of ultrasound in the insertion of a vascular closure device: a comparative retrospective study with the standard blind technique.
    Lucatelli P; Cannavale A; Cirelli C; d'Adamo A; Salvatori FM; Fanelli F
    Radiol Med; 2015 Mar; 120(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 25120078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FemoSeal
    Gabrielli R; Rosati MS; Millarelli M; Dante A; Maiorano M; Musilli A; Chiappa R; Ventura M
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Aug; 51():18-24. PubMed ID: 29678650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Angioseal VIP® vs. StarClose SE® closure devices: a comparative analysis in non-cardiological procedures.
    Lucatelli P; Fanelli F; Cannavale A; Corona M; Cirelli C; D'Adamo A; Salvatori FM; Catalano C
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Feb; 58(1):80-86. PubMed ID: 24309473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vascular closure devices for femoral arterial puncture site haemostasis.
    Robertson L; Andras A; Colgan F; Jackson R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 3(3):CD009541. PubMed ID: 26948236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Manual Compression to Vascular Closure Devices for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Arterial Procedures.
    Cox T; Blair L; Huntington C; Lincourt A; Sing R; Heniford BT
    Surg Technol Int; 2015 Nov; 27():32-44. PubMed ID: 26680377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the FemoSeal Vascular Closure Device With Manual Compression After Femoral Artery Puncture - Post-hoc Analysis of a Large-Scale, Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Mankerious N; Mayer K; Gewalt SM; Helde SM; Ibrahim T; Bott-Flügel L; Laugwitz KL; Schunkert H; Kastrati A; Schüpke S;
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 30(7):235-239. PubMed ID: 29760286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prophylactic Retrograde Distal Common Femoral Access as a Bail-out Strategy in Patients with Increased Risk for Femoral Access Complication During Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Sanghvi K; Swarup S; Burns P; Kovach R; Ross R; Soussa T
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):481-485. PubMed ID: 31375463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel double clip-based vascular closure device in antegrade and retrograde femoral punctures: A single-center experience in peripheral non-cardiac procedures.
    Thurner A; Heuer A; Augustin AM; Gietzen C; Bley TA; Kickuth R
    J Vasc Access; 2022 Sep; 23(5):778-787. PubMed ID: 33908308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: the Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial.
    Xhepa E; Byrne RA; Schulz S; Helde S; Gewalt S; Cassese S; Linhardt M; Ibrahim T; Mehilli J; Hoppe K; Grupp K; Kufner S; Böttiger C; Hoppmann P; Burgdorf C; Fusaro M; Ott I; Schneider S; Hengstenberg C; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A;
    EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 24952057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complication rates associated with antegrade use of vascular closure devices: a systematic review and pooled analysis.
    Kennedy SA; Rajan DK; Bassett P; Tan KT; Jaberi A; Mafeld S
    J Vasc Surg; 2021 Feb; 73(2):722-730.e1. PubMed ID: 32950629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy and safety of antegrade common femoral artery access closure using the Angio-Seal device: experience with 1889 interventions for critical limb ischemia in diabetic patients.
    Lupattelli T; Tannouri F; Garaci FG; Papa G; Pangos M; Somalvico F; Caravaggi C; Faglia E
    J Endovasc Ther; 2010 Jun; 17(3):366-75. PubMed ID: 20557177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and efficacy study of the wound care 360° SiteSeal® vascular closure device in percutaneous cardiac catheterization procedures.
    Sharma S; Patel N; Jeevanantham V; Gupta K; Earnest MB
    Vascular; 2021 Apr; 29(2):228-236. PubMed ID: 32718220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incidence of delayed angiographic femoral artery complications using the EXOSEAL vascular closure device.
    Grandhi R; Zhang X; Panczykowski D; Choi P; Hunnicutt CT; Jadhav AP; Ducruet AF; Jovin T; Jankowitz B
    Interv Neuroradiol; 2015 Jun; 21(3):401-6. PubMed ID: 26015532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The safety and efficacy of the StarClose Vascular Closure System: the ultrasound substudy of the CLIP study.
    Jaff MR; Hadley G; Hermiller JB; Simonton C; Hinohara T; Cannon L; Reisman M; Braden G; Fletcher DR; Zapien M; Chou TM; DiDonato K
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Nov; 68(5):684-9. PubMed ID: 17039509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy and time-to-hemostasis of antegrade femoral access closure using the ExoSeal vascular closure device: a retrospective single-center study.
    Boschewitz JM; Pieper CC; Andersson M; Nadal J; Schild HH; Meyer C
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 48(5):585-91. PubMed ID: 25201516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Retrospective Study Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of EXOSEAL Vascular Closure Device to Manual Compression in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Transbrachial Procedures.
    Wei X; Han T; Sun Y; Sun X; Wu Y; Wang S; Zhou J; Zhao Z; Jing Z
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2020 Jan; 62():310-317. PubMed ID: 31449959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical and Subclinical Femoral Vascular Complications after Deployment of two Different Vascular Closure Devices or Manual Compression in the Setting of Coronary Intervention.
    Yeni H; Axel M; Örnek A; Butz T; Maagh P; Plehn G
    Int J Med Sci; 2016; 13(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 27076781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of vascular closure devices vs manual compression after femoral artery puncture: the ISAR-CLOSURE randomized clinical trial.
    Schulz-Schüpke S; Helde S; Gewalt S; Ibrahim T; Linhardt M; Haas K; Hoppe K; Böttiger C; Groha P; Bradaric C; Schmidt R; Bott-Flügel L; Ott I; Goedel J; Byrne RA; Schneider S; Burgdorf C; Morath T; Kufner S; Joner M; Cassese S; Hoppmann P; Hengstenberg C; Pache J; Fusaro M; Massberg S; Mehilli J; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A;
    JAMA; 2014 Nov; 312(19):1981-7. PubMed ID: 25399273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-center comparison of the efficacy and complications of arterial vascular closure devices in interventional radiology.
    Elmasri MA; Kee ST; Moriarty JM; Gomes A; Lee EW; McWilliams JP
    J Vasc Access; 2017 Jul; 18(4):339-344. PubMed ID: 28665467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complications of a percutaneous suture-mediated closure device versus manual compression for arteriotomy closure: a case-controlled study.
    Wagner SC; Gonsalves CF; Eschelman DJ; Sullivan KL; Bonn J
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2003 Jun; 14(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 12817040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.