297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25121517)
1. Comparison of step outputs for waist and wrist accelerometer attachment sites.
Tudor-Locke C; Barreira TV; Schuna JM
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Apr; 47(4):839-42. PubMed ID: 25121517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison Between Wrist-Worn and Waist-Worn Accelerometry.
Loprinzi PD; Smith B
J Phys Act Health; 2017 Jul; 14(7):539-545. PubMed ID: 28290761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study.
Sjöberg V; Westergren J; Monnier A; Lo Martire R; Hagströmer M; Äng BO; Vixner L
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e24806. PubMed ID: 33433391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the Fitbit One® for physical activity measurement at an upper torso attachment site.
Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Shaffer JA; Ma Y; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE; Davidson KW
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Apr; 9():213. PubMed ID: 27068022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults.
Chu AH; Ng SH; Paknezhad M; Gauterin A; Koh D; Brown MS; Müller-Riemenschneider F
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of accelerometer wear location on the relationship between step counts and arterial stiffness in adults treated for hypertension and diabetes.
Cooke AB; Daskalopoulou SS; Dasgupta K
J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Apr; 21(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 28855085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of a Chest-worn accelerometer for physical activity measurement.
Zhang JH; Macfarlane DJ; Sobko T
J Sci Med Sport; 2016 Dec; 19(12):1015-1019. PubMed ID: 27017012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Step-counting accuracy of activity monitors in persons with Down syndrome.
Bertapelli F; Curtis JS; Carlson B; Johnson M; Abadie B; Agiovlasitis S
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 30239068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Field evaluation of a random forest activity classifier for wrist-worn accelerometer data.
Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Gomersall SR; Clark B; Trost SG
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jan; 20(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 27372275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative Analysis of ActiGraph Step Counting Methods in Adults: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.
Toth L; Paluch AE; Bassett DR; Rees-Punia E; Eberl EM; Park S; Evenson KR
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2024 Jan; 56(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 37703308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hip and Wrist Accelerometer Algorithms for Free-Living Behavior Classification.
Ellis K; Kerr J; Godbole S; Staudenmayer J; Lanckriet G
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 May; 48(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 26673126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Step-count outcomes of 13 different activity trackers: Results from laboratory and free-living experiments.
Nakagata T; Murakami H; Kawakami R; Tripette J; Nakae S; Yamada Y; Ishikawa-Takata K; Tanaka S; Miyachi M
Gait Posture; 2022 Oct; 98():24-33. PubMed ID: 36030707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Separating bedtime rest from activity using waist or wrist-worn accelerometers in youth.
Tracy DJ; Xu Z; Choi L; Acra S; Chen KY; Buchowski MS
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e92512. PubMed ID: 24727999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stepping up with GGIR: Validity of step cadence derived from wrist-worn research-grade accelerometers using the verisense step count algorithm.
Rowlands AV; Maylor B; Dawkins NP; Dempsey PC; Edwardson CL; Soczawa-Stronczyk AA; Bocian M; Patterson MR; Yates T
J Sports Sci; 2022 Oct; 40(19):2182-2190. PubMed ID: 36384415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cross-validation and out-of-sample testing of physical activity intensity predictions with a wrist-worn accelerometer.
Montoye AHK; Westgate BS; Fonley MR; Pfeiffer KA
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2018 May; 124(5):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 29369742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults.
Montoye AHK; Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Nelson MB; Bock JM; Imboden MT; Kaminsky LA
J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov; 38(22):2569-2578. PubMed ID: 32677510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of step count measured by physical activity monitors: The effect of gait speed and anatomical placement site.
Chow JJ; Thom JM; Wewege MA; Ward RE; Parmenter BJ
Gait Posture; 2017 Sep; 57():199-203. PubMed ID: 28666177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying bedrest using 24-h waist or wrist accelerometry in adults.
Tracy JD; Acra S; Chen KY; Buchowski MS
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194461. PubMed ID: 29570740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physical activity using wrist-worn accelerometers: comparison of dominant and non-dominant wrist.
Dieu O; Mikulovic J; Fardy PS; Bui-Xuan G; Béghin L; Vanhelst J
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2017 Sep; 37(5):525-529. PubMed ID: 26749436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of steps measured by smartphones-based WeRun compared with ActiGraph-GT3X accelerometer in free-living conditions.
Yao Q; Wang J; Sun Y; Zhang L; Sun S; Cheng M; Yang Q; Wang S; Huang L; Lin T; Jia Y
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():1009022. PubMed ID: 36582382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
