These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25121517)

  • 21. Wrist-Worn Accelerometer-Brand Independent Posture Classification.
    Rowlands AV; Yates T; Olds TS; Davies M; Khunti K; Edwardson CL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Apr; 48(4):748-54. PubMed ID: 26559451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure.
    Imboden MT; Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Montoye AH
    Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of step-count outcomes across seven different activity trackers: a free-living experiment with young and older adults.
    Nakagata T; Yamada Y; Taniguchi M; Nanri H; Kimura M; Miyachi M; Ono R
    BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil; 2024 Jul; 16(1):156. PubMed ID: 39026366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validating the accuracy of an activity monitor in a visually impaired older population.
    Bajaj R; Ramulu P; Dillon L; Jakobsen KB; Tiedemann A; Rogers K; Keay L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Sep; 38(5):562-569. PubMed ID: 29984414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.
    Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of activity monitors in controlled and free-living environments.
    Feito Y; Bassett DR; Thompson DL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Apr; 44(4):733-41. PubMed ID: 21904249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of physical activity assessed using hip- and wrist-worn accelerometers.
    Kamada M; Shiroma EJ; Harris TB; Lee IM
    Gait Posture; 2016 Feb; 44():23-8. PubMed ID: 27004628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A random forest classifier for the prediction of energy expenditure and type of physical activity from wrist and hip accelerometers.
    Ellis K; Kerr J; Godbole S; Lanckriet G; Wing D; Marshall S
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2191-203. PubMed ID: 25340969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Physical activity classification using the GENEA wrist-worn accelerometer.
    Zhang S; Rowlands AV; Murray P; Hurst TL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Apr; 44(4):742-8. PubMed ID: 21988935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparability and feasibility of wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers in free-living adolescents.
    Scott JJ; Rowlands AV; Cliff DP; Morgan PJ; Plotnikoff RC; Lubans DR
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Dec; 20(12):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28501418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Validation of a pouch-mounted activPAL3 accelerometer.
    Stanton R; Guertler D; Duncan MJ; Vandelanotte C
    Gait Posture; 2014 Sep; 40(4):688-93. PubMed ID: 25161009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Do wearable fitness devices correlate with performance-based tests of work-related functional capacity?
    Karpman J; Gross DP; Manns P; Tomkins-Lane C
    Work; 2020; 66(1):201-211. PubMed ID: 32417827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. "What Is a Step?" Differences in How a Step Is Detected among Three Popular Activity Monitors That Have Impacted Physical Activity Research.
    John D; Morton A; Arguello D; Lyden K; Bassett D
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Apr; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 29662048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity.
    Tudor-Locke C; Ainsworth BE; Thompson RW; Matthews CE
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 Dec; 34(12):2045-51. PubMed ID: 12471314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Classification of physical activity intensities using a wrist-worn accelerometer in 8-12-year-old children.
    Chandler JL; Brazendale K; Beets MW; Mealing BA
    Pediatr Obes; 2016 Apr; 11(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 25893950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of Wrist- and Hip-Worn Activity Monitors When Meeting Step Guidelines.
    Nelson RK; Hasanaj K; Connolly G; Millen L; Muench J; Bidolli NSC; Preston MA; Montoye AHK
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2022 Apr; 19():E18. PubMed ID: 35420981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of Accelerometry Methods for Estimating Physical Activity.
    Kerr J; Marinac CR; Ellis K; Godbole S; Hipp A; Glanz K; Mitchell J; Laden F; James P; Berrigan D
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Mar; 49(3):617-624. PubMed ID: 27755355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy and precision of wrist-worn actigraphy for measuring steps taken during over-ground and treadmill walking in adults with Parkinson's disease.
    Cederberg KLJ; Jeng B; Sasaki JE; Lai B; Bamman M; Motl RW
    Parkinsonism Relat Disord; 2021 Jul; 88():102-107. PubMed ID: 34171566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Validation of the Vivago Wrist-Worn accelerometer in the assessment of physical activity.
    Vanhelst J; Hurdiel R; Mikulovic J; Bui-Xuân G; Fardy P; Theunynck D; Béghin L
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Aug; 12():690. PubMed ID: 22913286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X.
    Knaier R; Höchsmann C; Infanger D; Hinrichs T; Schmidt-Trucksäss A
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):244. PubMed ID: 30819148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.