These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25121564)

  • 21. Publishing coronavirology: Peering into peer(less?) review.
    Pederson T
    FASEB J; 2020 Aug; 34(8):9825-9827. PubMed ID: 32803811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Peer-review policy and guidelines for Biochemia Medica Journal.
    Smolčić VŠ; Simundić AM
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2014; 24(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 25351350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Medical journals and conflicts of interest.
    Steinbrook R; Lo B
    J Law Med Ethics; 2012; 40(3):488-99. PubMed ID: 23061576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A suggested code of conduct for editors of peer-reviewed journals.
    Glover D
    J Wound Care; 2006 Feb; 15(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 16521599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Editorial research and the publication process in biomedicine and health: Report from the Esteve Foundation Discussion Group, December 2012.
    Marušić A; Malički M; von Elm E
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2014; 24(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 24969914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The editorial process for medical journals: I. Introduction of a series and discussion of the responsibilities of editors, authors, and reviewers.
    Liesegang TJ; Albert DM; Schachat AP; Minckler DS
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jul; 136(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 12834678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike.
    Carrell DT; Rajpert-De Meyts E
    Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):531-2. PubMed ID: 23785017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol).
    Galipeau J; Moher D; Skidmore B; Campbell C; Hendry P; Cameron DW; Hébert PC; Palepu A
    Syst Rev; 2013 Jun; 2():41. PubMed ID: 23773340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.
    Galipeau J; Barbour V; Baskin P; Bell-Syer S; Cobey K; Cumpston M; Deeks J; Garner P; MacLehose H; Shamseer L; Straus S; Tugwell P; Wager E; Winker M; Moher D
    BMC Med; 2016 Feb; 14():16. PubMed ID: 26837937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predatory Journals: What Nurse Educators Need to Know.
    Fitzpatrick JJ
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2015; 36(1):7. PubMed ID: 29194149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fraud in science.
    Altman L; Melcher L
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Jun; 286(6383):2003-6. PubMed ID: 6409204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review.
    Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A
    Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How Publish or Perish Promotes Inaccuracy in Science -- and Journalism.
    Oransky I
    AMA J Ethics; 2015 Dec; 17(12):1172-5. PubMed ID: 26698592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Peering into peer review.
    Nat Microbiol; 2019 Jul; 4(7):1065. PubMed ID: 31222174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals.
    Albert DM; Liesegang TJ; Schachat AP
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 123(5):684-6. PubMed ID: 15883290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.
    Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):231-50. PubMed ID: 23538175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
    Newton DP
    Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Manual Therapy adopts mandatory reporting guidelines for publishing.
    Cook C; Jull G; Moore A
    Man Ther; 2014 Oct; 19(5):365-6. PubMed ID: 25090975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Consultative review is worth the wait.
    King SR
    Elife; 2017 Sep; 6():. PubMed ID: 28954691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Publication ethics and COPE.
    Bachelet VC
    Medwave; 2016 May; 16(4):e6456. PubMed ID: 27281549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.