306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25123233)
1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation vs arterial embolization for intractable epistaxis.
Rudmik L; Leung R
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Sep; 140(9):802-8. PubMed ID: 25123233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of trans-nasal endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation vs arterial embolisation for intractable epistaxis: Long-term analyses.
Costa N; Mounié M; Bernard G; Bieler L; Molinier L; Serrano E; de Bonnecaze G
Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Jul; 44(4):511-517. PubMed ID: 30720918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing a laddered algorithm for the management of intractable epistaxis: a risk analysis.
Leung RM; Smith TL; Rudmik L
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 May; 141(5):405-9. PubMed ID: 25719360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Economic analysis of the treatment of posterior epistaxis.
Miller TR; Stevens ES; Orlandi RR
Am J Rhinol; 2005; 19(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 15794080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transnasal Endoscopic Sphenopalatine Artery Ligation Compared With Embolization for Intractable Epistaxis: A Long-term Analysis.
de Bonnecaze G; Gallois Y; Bonneville F; Vergez S; Chaput B; Serrano E
Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2018 May; 32(3):188-193. PubMed ID: 29676168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic ligation of the sphenopalatine artery and the maxillary artery for the treatment of intractable posterior epistaxis.
Seno S; Arikata M; Sakurai H; Owaki S; Fukui J; Suzuki M; Shimizu T
Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2009; 23(2):197-9. PubMed ID: 19401049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimizing the outcome of transnasal endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation in managing refractory posterior epistaxis: A case-control analysis.
Dutta M; Haldar D
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2017 Oct; 44(5):554-560. PubMed ID: 27876219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Management of intractable spontaneous epistaxis.
Rudmik L; Smith TL
Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2012; 26(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 22391084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Routine magnetic resonance imaging for idiopathic olfactory loss: a modeling-based economic evaluation.
Rudmik L; Smith KA; Soler ZM; Schlosser RJ; Smith TL
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Oct; 140(10):911-7. PubMed ID: 25211179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation versus nasal packing as first-line treatment for posterior epistaxis.
Dedhia RC; Desai SS; Smith KJ; Lee S; Schaitkin BM; Snyderman CH; Wang EW
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2013 Jul; 3(7):563-6. PubMed ID: 23307796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of the endoscopic versus microscopic approach for pituitary adenoma resection.
Rudmik L; Starreveld YP; Vandergrift WA; Banglawala SM; Soler ZM
Laryngoscope; 2015 Jan; 125(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 24938934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of Endoscopic Internal Maxillary Artery Ligation in Intractable Idiopathic Epistaxis.
Sasindran V; John MS
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Jun; 72(2):228-233. PubMed ID: 32551282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variations in utilization and clinical outcomes for endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation and endovascular arterial embolization in a single multi-hospital network.
Lelegren M; Bhat K; Sheehan B; Lamichhane R; Han JK; Lam KK
Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(6):103066. PubMed ID: 33934006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of internal maxillary artery ligation versus embolization for refractory posterior epistaxis.
Cullen MM; Tami TA
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 May; 118(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 9591862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recent trends in epistaxis management in the United States: 2008-2010.
Villwock JA; Jones K
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 139(12):1279-84. PubMed ID: 24136624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intractable epistaxis: transantral ligation vs. embolization: efficacy review and cost analysis.
Strong EB; Bell DA; Johnson LP; Jacobs JM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Dec; 113(6):674-8. PubMed ID: 7501376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inpatient management of epistaxis: outcomes and cost.
Goddard JC; Reiter ER
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 May; 132(5):707-12. PubMed ID: 15886622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trends in epistaxis embolization in the United States: a study of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2003-2010.
Brinjikji W; Kallmes DF; Cloft HJ
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Jul; 24(7):969-73. PubMed ID: 23648006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Economic evaluation of floseal compared to nasal packing for the management of anterior epistaxis.
Le A; Thavorn K; Lasso A; Kilty SJ
Laryngoscope; 2018 Aug; 128(8):1778-1782. PubMed ID: 29314035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endoscopic Sphenopalatine Artery Ligation in Posterior Epistaxis: Retrospective Analysis of 30 Patients.
İsmi O; Vayisoğlu Y; Özcan C; Görür K; Ünal M
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 54(2):47-52. PubMed ID: 29392016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
