These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

539 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25123769)

  • 21. Assessing image-guided implant surgery in today's clinical practice.
    Norkin FJ; Ganeles J; Zfaz S; Modares A
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013; 34(10):747-50; quiz 751. PubMed ID: 24571503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.
    Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The expanding influence of computed tomography and the application of computer-guided implantology.
    Mandelaris GA; Rosenfeld AL
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 20(5):297-305; quiz 306. PubMed ID: 18649832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Surgery.
    Panchal N; Mahmood L; Retana A; Emery R
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2019 Nov; 31(4):539-547. PubMed ID: 31563194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Presurgical implant-site assessment and restoratively driven digital planning.
    Scherer MD
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jul; 58(3):561-95. PubMed ID: 24993924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of tube current on cone-beam computerized tomography image quality for presurgical implant planning in vitro.
    Sur J; Seki K; Koizumi H; Nakajima K; Okano T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Sep; 110(3):e29-33. PubMed ID: 20598589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites. The use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning for congenitally missing lateral incisors.
    Ganz SD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Jun; 29(5):256-8, 260-2, 264-7; quiz 268, 278. PubMed ID: 18795643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Immediate Implant Prosthesis Via Guided Bone Reduction.
    Ahuja S; Egbert N; Wicks R; Brandt R
    Dent Today; 2015 Jul; 34(7):142-5. PubMed ID: 26285350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dental imaging in implant treatment planning.
    Chan HL; Misch K; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2010 Aug; 19(4):288-98. PubMed ID: 20683285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. CAD/CAM guided surgery in implant dentistry. A review of software packages and step-by-step protocols for planning surgical guides.
    Scherer MD; Kattadiyil MT; Parciak E; Puri S
    Alpha Omegan; 2014; 107(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 24881445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cone Beam Computed Tomography for the Dental Implant Patient.
    Klokkevold PR
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Sep; 43(9):521-30. PubMed ID: 26820009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Virtual 3-dimensional representation of a completely edentulous patient for computer-aided static implant planning.
    Pérez-Giugovaz MG; Sadeghpour M; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):384-390. PubMed ID: 34315612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digitally enhanced dentistry: the power of digital design.
    Guichet D
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Mar; 43(3):135-41. PubMed ID: 25864301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.
    Dreiseidler T; Neugebauer J; Ritter L; Lingohr T; Rothamel D; Mischkowski RA; Zöller JE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1191-9. PubMed ID: 19681962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of Virtual Dental Implant Planning Using the Full Cross-Sectional and Transaxial Capabilities of Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Reformatted Panoramic Imaging and 3D Modeling.
    Khan M; Elathamna EN; Lin WS; Harris BT; Farman AG; Scheetz JP; Morton D; Scarfe WC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(4):814-9. PubMed ID: 26252033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Guided Surgery in Pre-doctorate Clinic: A Case Study.
    Seitz S; Zimmermann R; Nguyen D
    Tex Dent J; 2015 Apr; 132(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 26234106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Radiologic techniques using CBCT and 3-D treatment planning for implant placement.
    Peck JN; Conte GJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Apr; 36(4):287-90, 292-4, 296-7. PubMed ID: 18481625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. SIMPLANT® computer-guided implant treatment software: unlocking digital potential.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2014; 35(10):782. PubMed ID: 25742683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of cone beam computed tomography and a laser intraoral scanner in virtual dental implant surgery: part 1.
    Lee CY; Ganz SD; Wong N; Suzuki JB
    Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 22814549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Restoratively driven implant dentistry utilizing advanced software and CBCT: realistic abutments and virtual teeth.
    Ganz SD
    Dent Today; 2008 Jul; 27(7):122, 124, 126-7. PubMed ID: 18686668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.