These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25123774)

  • 1. Optimizing multiple-choice tests as tools for learning.
    Little JL; Bjork EL
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 25123774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple-choice tests exonerated, at least of some charges: fostering test-induced learning and avoiding test-induced forgetting.
    Little JL; Bjork EL; Bjork RA; Angello G
    Psychol Sci; 2012; 23(11):1337-44. PubMed ID: 23034566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How "none of the above" (NOTA) affects the accessibility of tested and related information in multiple-choice questions.
    Blendermann MF; Little JL; Gray KM
    Memory; 2020 Apr; 28(4):473-480. PubMed ID: 32106781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of retrieval in answering multiple-choice questions.
    Little JL; Frickey EA; Fung AK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1473-1485. PubMed ID: 30113206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple-choice pretesting potentiates learning of related information.
    Little JL; Bjork EL
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Oct; 44(7):1085-101. PubMed ID: 27177505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the learning benefits of confidence-weighted testing.
    Sparck EM; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2016; 1(1):3. PubMed ID: 28180154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple-choice tests stabilize access to marginal knowledge.
    Cantor AD; Eslick AN; Marsh EJ; Bjork RA; Bjork EL
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Feb; 43(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 25201690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effect of Type of Feedback in Multiple-Choice Testing on Long-Term Retention.
    Jang Y; Marshall E
    J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(2):107-119. PubMed ID: 29547068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "None of the above" as a correct and incorrect alternative on a multiple-choice test: implications for the testing effect.
    Odegard TN; Koen JD
    Memory; 2007 Nov; 15(8):873-85. PubMed ID: 17965982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrieval practice with short-answer, multiple-choice, and hybrid tests.
    Smith MA; Karpicke JD
    Memory; 2014; 22(7):784-802. PubMed ID: 24059563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Memorial consequences of answering SAT II questions.
    Marsh EJ; Agarwal PK; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19309212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests.
    Butler AC; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2007 Dec; 13(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 18194050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Memorial consequences of testing school-aged children.
    Marsh EJ; Fazio LK; Goswick AE
    Memory; 2012; 20(8):899-906. PubMed ID: 22891857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating the potential influence of established multiple-choice test-taking cues on item response in a pharmacotherapy board certification examination preparatory manual: a pilot study.
    Gettig JP
    Pharmacotherapy; 2006 Apr; 26(4):558-62. PubMed ID: 16553516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pretesting versus posttesting: Comparing the pedagogical benefits of errorful generation and retrieval practice.
    Pan SC; Sana F
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Jun; 27(2):237-257. PubMed ID: 33793291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrieval attempts enhance learning regardless of time spent trying to retrieve.
    Vaughn KE; Hausman H; Kornell N
    Memory; 2017 Mar; 25(3):298-316. PubMed ID: 27078516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. All of the above: When multiple correct response options enhance the testing effect.
    Bishara AJ; Lanzo LA
    Memory; 2015; 23(7):1013-28. PubMed ID: 25122187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using the regulation of accuracy to study performance when the correct answer is not known.
    Luna K; Martín-Luengo B
    Scand J Psychol; 2017 Aug; 58(4):275-283. PubMed ID: 28574210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dark side of corrective feedback: Controlled and automatic influences of retrieval practice.
    Alamri A; Higham PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 May; 48(5):752-768. PubMed ID: 35389700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attempting to answer a meaningful question enhances subsequent learning even when feedback is delayed.
    Kornell N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 23855547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.