BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25124673)

  • 1. Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications.
    Stern AM; Casadevall A; Steen RG; Fang FC
    Elife; 2014 Aug; 3():e02956. PubMed ID: 25124673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: A systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions.
    Stavale R; Ferreira GI; Galvão JAM; Zicker F; Novaes MRCG; Oliveira CM; Guilhem D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214272. PubMed ID: 30986211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retracted publications in the drug literature.
    Samp JC; Schumock GT; Pickard AS
    Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):586-95. PubMed ID: 22581659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?
    Nath SB; Marcus SC; Druss BG
    Med J Aust; 2006 Aug; 185(3):152-4. PubMed ID: 16893357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comprehensive analysis of retracted journal articles in the field of veterinary medicine and animal health.
    Christopher MM
    BMC Vet Res; 2022 Feb; 18(1):73. PubMed ID: 35180878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeating probability of authors with retracted scientific publications.
    Kuroki T; Ukawa A
    Account Res; 2018; 25(4):212-219. PubMed ID: 29519161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Publication rates after the first retraction for biomedical researchers with multiple retracted publications.
    Mistry V; Grey A; Bolland MJ
    Account Res; 2019 Jul; 26(5):277-287. PubMed ID: 31025884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings.
    Resnik DB; Dinse GE
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Jan; 39(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 22942373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a systematic, retrospective study.
    Stretton S; Bramich NJ; Keys JR; Monk JA; Ely JA; Haley C; Woolley MJ; Woolley KL
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Oct; 28(10):1575-83. PubMed ID: 22978774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retracted publications and their citation in dental literature: A systematic review.
    Rapani A; Lombardi T; Berton F; Del Lupo V; Di Lenarda R; Stacchi C
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2020 Aug; 6(4):383-390. PubMed ID: 32233020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018.
    Dal-Ré R; Ayuso C
    J Med Genet; 2019 Nov; 56(11):734-740. PubMed ID: 31300549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retracted articles in surgery journals. What are surgeons doing wrong?
    Cassão BD; Herbella FAM; Schlottmann F; Patti MG
    Surgery; 2018 Jun; 163(6):1201-1206. PubMed ID: 29525734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The landscape of urological retractions: the prevalence of reported research misconduct.
    Mena JD; Ndoye M; Cohen AJ; Kamal P; Breyer BN
    BJU Int; 2019 Jul; 124(1):174-179. PubMed ID: 30748082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Life After Research Misconduct.
    Galbraith KL
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Feb; 12(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 28220722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.
    Fang FC; Steen RG; Casadevall A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Oct; 109(42):17028-33. PubMed ID: 23027971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
    Steen RG
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retractions by Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences due to Scientific Misconduct.
    Jawaid SA; Jawaid M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 Aug; 26(8):718-9. PubMed ID: 27539774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology.
    Chambers LM; Michener CM; Falcone T
    BJOG; 2019 Aug; 126(9):1134-1140. PubMed ID: 30903641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific misconduct and accountability in teams.
    Hussinger K; Pellens M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0215962. PubMed ID: 31048907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity.
    Fanelli D; Costas R; Larivière V
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0127556. PubMed ID: 26083381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.