304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25125493)
1. Evaluation of the Green Dot Bystander Intervention to Reduce Interpersonal Violence Among College Students Across Three Campuses.
Coker AL; Fisher BS; Bush HM; Swan SC; Williams CM; Clear ER; DeGue S
Violence Against Women; 2015 Dec; 21(12):1507-27. PubMed ID: 25125493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multi-College Bystander Intervention Evaluation for Violence Prevention.
Coker AL; Bush HM; Fisher BS; Swan SC; Williams CM; Clear ER; DeGue S
Am J Prev Med; 2016 Mar; 50(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 26541099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An Evaluation of Two Dating Violence Prevention Programs on a College Campus.
Peterson K; Sharps P; Banyard V; Powers RA; Kaukinen C; Gross D; Decker MR; Baatz C; Campbell J
J Interpers Violence; 2018 Dec; 33(23):3630-3655. PubMed ID: 26976433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting Improvement After a Bystander Program for the Prevention of Sexual and Dating Violence.
Hines DA; Palm Reed KM
Health Promot Pract; 2015 Jul; 16(4):550-9. PubMed ID: 25380846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preventing Interpersonal Violence on College Campuses: The Effect of One Act Training on Bystander Intervention.
AlegrÃa-Flores K; Raker K; Pleasants RK; Weaver MA; Weinberger M
J Interpers Violence; 2017 Apr; 32(7):1103-1126. PubMed ID: 26002875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Raising a Red Flag on Dating Violence: Evaluation of a Low-Resource, College-Based Bystander Behavior Intervention Program.
Borsky AE; McDonnell K; Turner MM; Rimal R
J Interpers Violence; 2018 Nov; 33(22):3480-3501. PubMed ID: 26965908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Green Dot: an active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses.
Coker AL; Cook-Craig PG; Williams CM; Fisher BS; Clear ER; Garcia LS; Hegge LM
Violence Against Women; 2011 Jun; 17(6):777-96. PubMed ID: 21642269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An exploratory analysis of college students' response and reporting behavior regarding intimate partner violence victimization and perpetration among their friends.
Branch KA; Richards TN; Dretsch EC
J Interpers Violence; 2013 Dec; 28(18):3386-99. PubMed ID: 24114762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effectiveness of College Dating Violence Prevention Programs: A Meta-Analysis.
Wong JS; Bouchard J; Lee C
Trauma Violence Abuse; 2023 Apr; 24(2):684-701. PubMed ID: 34342255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implications for sexual assault prevention: college students as prosocial bystanders.
Exner D; Cummings N
J Am Coll Health; 2011; 59(7):655-7. PubMed ID: 21823961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bystander programs addressing sexual violence on college campuses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of program outcomes and delivery methods.
Jouriles EN; Krauss A; Vu NL; Banyard VL; McDonald R
J Am Coll Health; 2018; 66(6):457-466. PubMed ID: 29405865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of Bystander Programs to Prevent Dating Abuse Among Youth and Young Adults: A Review of the Literature.
Storer HL; Casey E; Herrenkohl T
Trauma Violence Abuse; 2016 Jul; 17(3):256-69. PubMed ID: 25951840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing Bystander Behavior Intentions Toward Friends to Prevent Dating Violence: Development of the Bystander Behavior Intentions-Friends Scale Through Concept Mapping and Exploratory Factor Analysis.
Borsky AE; McDonnell K; Rimal RN; Turner M
Violence Vict; 2016; 31(2):215-34. PubMed ID: 26822267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The escalation dating abuse workshop for college students: Results of an efficacy RCT.
Rothman EF; Paruk J; Banyard V
J Am Coll Health; 2018; 66(6):519-528. PubMed ID: 29405867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bystander education training for campus sexual assault prevention: an initial meta-analysis.
Katz J; Moore J
Violence Vict; 2013; 28(6):1054-67. PubMed ID: 24547680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bystander Program to Reduce Sexual Violence by Witnessing Parental Intimate Partner Violence Status.
Mennicke AM; Bush HM; Brancato CJ; Coker AL
Am J Prev Med; 2022 Aug; 63(2):262-272. PubMed ID: 35279345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A web-based sexual violence bystander intervention for male college students: randomized controlled trial.
Salazar LF; Vivolo-Kantor A; Hardin J; Berkowitz A
J Med Internet Res; 2014 Sep; 16(9):e203. PubMed ID: 25198417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantifying College Students' Bystander Behavior to Prevent Sexual Assault and Intimate Partner Violence: Can We Make Improvements?
Krauss A; McDonald R; Cascardi M; Grych JH; Banyard VL; Rosenfield D; Jouriles EN
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Aug; 38(15-16):9369-9394. PubMed ID: 37199375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. RCT Testing Bystander Effectiveness to Reduce Violence.
Coker AL; Bush HM; Cook-Craig PG; DeGue SA; Clear ER; Brancato CJ; Fisher BS; Recktenwald EA
Am J Prev Med; 2017 May; 52(5):566-578. PubMed ID: 28279546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Systematic Review of Dating Violence Risk Factors Among Undergraduate College Students.
Duval A; Lanning BA; Patterson MS
Trauma Violence Abuse; 2020 Jul; 21(3):567-585. PubMed ID: 29911506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
