These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25125844)

  • 1. Evaluation of smear layer removal from ultrasonically prepared retrocavities by three agents.
    Srinivasan R; Ashwathappa GS; Junjanna P; Bhandary S; Aswathanarayana RM; Shetty A
    J Conserv Dent; 2014 Jul; 17(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 25125844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Removal of surgical smear layer.
    Fabiani C; Franco V; Covello F; Brambilla E; Gagliani MM
    J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):836-8. PubMed ID: 21787500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of chitosan and carboxymethyl chitosan as retrograde smear layer removing agents.
    Penumaka R; Konagala RK; Shaik J; Ram Sunil CH; Reddy PL; Kiran Naik MK
    J Conserv Dent; 2019; 22(6):573-577. PubMed ID: 33088068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of a carbon dioxide laser on periodontally involved root surfaces.
    Misra V; Mehrotra KK; Dixit J; Maitra SC
    J Periodontol; 1999 Sep; 70(9):1046-52. PubMed ID: 10505808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of demineralization of radicular dentin with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 10% citric acid, and MTAD at different time intervals: An in vitro study.
    Kumar Y; Lohar J; Bhat S; Bhati M; Gandhi A; Mehta A
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2016; 6(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 27011932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of 17% EDTA and 10% citric acid in smear layer removal and tubular dentin sealer penetration.
    Machado R; Garcia LDFR; da Silva Neto UX; Cruz Filho AMD; Silva RG; Vansan LP
    Microsc Res Tech; 2018 Mar; 81(3):275-282. PubMed ID: 29205666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher file on smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation].
    Xin Y; Yang J; Song KY
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 37(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 30854818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The adaptation of mechanically softened gutta-percha to the canal walls in the presence or absence of smear layer: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Pallarés A; Faus V; Glickman GN
    Int Endod J; 1995 Sep; 28(5):266-9. PubMed ID: 8626210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Smear layer removal and sealer penetration with different tapers after using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming technique.
    Eldeeb IM; Nawar NN; Saber SM; Hassanein EE; Schäfer E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Aug; 25(8):5025-5032. PubMed ID: 33538899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Smear Layer Removal and Microhardness Alteration Potential of a Naturally Occurring Antioxidant - An In Vitro Study.
    Rajakumaran A; Ramesh H; Ashok R; Balaji L; Ganesh A
    Cureus; 2019 Jul; 11(7):e5241. PubMed ID: 31565639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Push-out bond strength of gutta-percha with a new bioceramic sealer in the presence or absence of smear layer.
    Shokouhinejad N; Gorjestani H; Nasseh AA; Hoseini A; Mohammadi M; Shamshiri AR
    Aust Endod J; 2013 Dec; 39(3):102-6. PubMed ID: 24279654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of final irrigation on the penetrability of an epoxy resin-based sealer into dentinal tubules: a confocal microscopy study.
    Jardine AP; Rosa RA; Santini MF; Wagner M; Só MV; Kuga MC; Pereira JR; Kopper PM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jan; 20(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 25903061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic irrigants and two types of laser.
    Takeda FH; Harashima T; Kimura Y; Matsumoto K
    Int Endod J; 1999 Jan; 32(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 10356467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sealer penetration into dentinal tubules in the presence or absence of smear layer: a confocal laser scanning microscopic study.
    Kuçi A; Alaçam T; Yavaş O; Ergul-Ulger Z; Kayaoglu G
    J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1627-31. PubMed ID: 25260735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of smear layer on depth of penetration of three endodontic sealers: an SEM study.
    Kouvas V; Liolios E; Vassiliadis L; Parissis-Messimeris S; Boutsioukis A
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1998 Aug; 14(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 9796484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of smear layer on sealing property of root canal obturation using 3 different techniques and sealers. Part I.
    Tzanetakis GN; Kakavetsos VD; Kontakiotis EG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Feb; 109(2):e145-53. PubMed ID: 19875316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of 17% EDTA and QMiX ultrasonic activation on smear layer removal and sealer penetration: ex vivo study.
    Matos FS; da Silva FR; Paranhos LR; Moura CCG; Bresciani E; Valera MC
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):10311. PubMed ID: 32587397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of smear layer on microbial coronal leakage of gutta-percha root fillings.
    Chailertvanitkul P; Saunders WP; MacKenzie D
    Int Endod J; 1996 Jul; 29(4):242-8. PubMed ID: 9206440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of EDTA gel conditioning exposure time on periodontitis-affected human root surfaces: surface topography and PDL cell adhesion.
    Gamal AY; Mailhot JM
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2003 Jan; 5(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 12666951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
    Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.