173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25126532)
1. Multi criteria decision making to select the best method for the preparation of solid lipid nanoparticles of rasagiline mesylate using analytic hierarchy process.
Kunasekaran V; Krishnamoorthy K
J Adv Pharm Technol Res; 2014 Jul; 5(3):115-21. PubMed ID: 25126532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of the moist-heat sterilization on fabricated nanoscale solid lipid particles containing rasagiline mesylate.
Viveksarathi K; Kannan K
Int J Pharm Investig; 2015; 5(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 25838993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selection of a suitable method for the preparation of polymeric nanoparticles: multi-criteria decision making approach.
Krishnamoorthy K; Mahalingam M
Adv Pharm Bull; 2015 Mar; 5(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 25789220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using an innovative criteria weighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP.
De Feo G; De Gisi S
Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2370-82. PubMed ID: 20444589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multi criteria decision making to select the suitable method for the preparation of nanoparticles using an analytical hierarchy process.
Velmurugan R; Selvamuthukumar S; Manavalan R
Pharmazie; 2011 Nov; 66(11):836-42. PubMed ID: 22204128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Developing an extended producer responsibility system for solid waste management in Jordan using multi-criteria decision-making approach.
Abu-Qdais H; Al-Saleh M
Waste Manag Res; 2023 Sep; ():734242X231198444. PubMed ID: 37706656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The analytic network process for the pharmaceutical sector: Multi criteria decision making to select the suitable method for the preparation of nanoparticles.
Velmurugan R; Selvamuthukumar S
Daru; 2012 Oct; 20(1):59. PubMed ID: 23352327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic assessment of benefits and risks: study protocol for a multi-criteria decision analysis using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for comparative effectiveness research.
Maruthur NM; Joy S; Dolan J; Segal JB; Shihab HM; Singh S
F1000Res; 2013; 2():160. PubMed ID: 24555077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nanoliposome Precursors for Shape Modulation: Use of Heuristic Algorithm and QBD Principles for Encapsulating Phytochemicals.
Nadaf SJ; Killedar SG
Curr Drug Deliv; 2020; 17(7):599-612. PubMed ID: 32394839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of Delphi-AHP methods to select the priorities of WEEE for recycling in a waste management decision-making tool.
Kim M; Jang YC; Lee S
J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():941-8. PubMed ID: 23892135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sequential decision tree using the analytic hierarchy process for decision support in rectal cancer.
Suner A; Çelikoğlu CC; Dicle O; Sökmen S
Artif Intell Med; 2012 Sep; 56(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 22776889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prioritizing the noise control methods by using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method in an Iranian tire factory.
Hassanvand D; Shirvan HE; Ghotbi-Ravandi MR; Beytollahi M
Work; 2021; 70(3):883-892. PubMed ID: 34719470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Post-surgery length of stay using multi-criteria decision-making tool.
Buttigieg SC; Gauci D; Bezzina F; Dey PK
J Health Organ Manag; 2018 Jun; 32(4):514-531. PubMed ID: 29969350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The application of a multi-parameter analysis in choosing the location of a new solid waste landfill in Serbia.
Milosevic I; Naunovic Z
Waste Manag Res; 2013 Oct; 31(10):1019-27. PubMed ID: 23853238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marketing methods for electronic resources in medical libraries: a study on the application of the analytical hierarchy process.
Eskrootchi R; Boroumand MA
J Med Libr Assoc; 2022 Jul; 110(3):332-339. PubMed ID: 36589300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A web-based software for group decision with analytic hierarchy process.
Françozo RV; Junior LSVU; Carrapateira ES; Pacheco BCS; Oliveira MT; Torsoni GB; Yari J
MethodsX; 2023 Dec; 11():102277. PubMed ID: 37519948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Group decision making with the analytic hierarchy process in benefit-risk assessment: a tutorial.
Hummel JM; Bridges JF; IJzerman MJ
Patient; 2014; 7(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 24623191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New approach for selecting a suitable recycling collection program for recovered paper and pulp recyclables using AHP-TOPSIS techniques.
Bafail OA; Abdulaal RM
Waste Manag Res; 2021 Nov; 39(11):1406-1413. PubMed ID: 33759660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection.
Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
Springerplus; 2016; 5():263. PubMed ID: 27006872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring patients' priorities using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in comparison with Best-Worst-Scaling and rating cards: methodological aspects and ranking tasks.
Schmidt K; Babac A; Pauer F; Damm K; von der Schulenburg JM
Health Econ Rev; 2016 Dec; 6(1):50. PubMed ID: 27844450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
