These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25126615)

  • 41. Comparative translucency of esthetic composite resin restorative materials.
    Ryan EA; Tam LE; McComb D
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2010; 76():a84. PubMed ID: 20719098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Replacing Amalgam Restorations: A Standardized Protocol Based on Analyzing Tissue Physicochemical Modifications.
    Decup F; Epaillard A; Chemla F
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Dec; 23(4):164-72. PubMed ID: 26767237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Creating esthetic composite restorations.
    Grin D
    J Dent Technol; 2000 May; 17(4):13-6. PubMed ID: 11323912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Periodontal surgery associated with odontoplasty in the esthetic functional rehabilitation of a fractured anterior tooth.
    Neto JB; da Cruz MK; Barbosa RP; Masotti AS; Duarte PM; Martos J
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(6):e236-9. PubMed ID: 21062706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Propagation of light through human dental enamel and dentine.
    Vaarkamp J; ten Bosch JJ; Verdonschot EH
    Caries Res; 1995; 29(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 7867056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite-enamel and composite-dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part II: roughness with diamond finishing and differences between enamel composite vs body composite.
    Ferraris F; Conti A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(2):184-204. PubMed ID: 24765626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Experimental evaluation of two methodologies for the restoration of crown fracture in permanent anterior teeth.
    Stellini E; De Francesco M; Sivolella S; Ferro R; Denotti G; Oberholtzer D; Mazzoleni S
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Jun; 13(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 22762168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Ultrastructural characterization of tooth-biomaterial interfaces prepared with broad and focused ion beams.
    Coutinho E; Jarmar T; Svahn F; Neves AA; Verlinden B; Van Meerbeek B; Engqvist H
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1325-37. PubMed ID: 19596422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Minimally invasive dentistry and its impact on esthetic restorative dentistry.
    Okuda WH
    Gen Dent; 2013 Aug; 61(5):24-6. PubMed ID: 23928433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Marginal gap formation of light-activated restorative materials: effects of immediate setting shrinkage and bond strength.
    Irie M; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2002 May; 18(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 11823011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Re-imagining esthetic restorative dentistry using a dimer-chemistry nanohybrid composite with low-shrinkage high monomer conversion.
    Strassler HE
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 May; 31 Spec No 2():16-21. PubMed ID: 20521570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A new approach to compare the esthetic properties of different composite materials.
    Østervemb N; Jørgensen JN; Hørsted-Bindslev P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Aug; 23(4):238-46. PubMed ID: 21806755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The art and science of the direct posterior restoration: recreating form, color, and translucency.
    Rubinstein S; Nidetz A
    Alpha Omegan; 2007; 100(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17566302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Posterior restorations--a clinical view.
    Jedynakiewicz NM; Martin N
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 11317380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Rationalization of incisor shape: experimental-numerical analysis.
    Magne P; Versluis A; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):345-55. PubMed ID: 10050124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Integrating dental anatomy and biomaterials: an innovative use of composite resin.
    Allen KL; McAndrew M
    Gen Dent; 2004; 52(2):132-3. PubMed ID: 15101307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Utilization of different management concepts in fractured tooth fragment reattachment: a report of three cases.
    Patel N; Patel K; Venkataraghavan K; Madan S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Sep; 14(5):973-9. PubMed ID: 24685808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effect of airborne-particle abrasion on the shear bond strength of four restorative materials to enamel and dentin.
    Mujdeci A; Gokay O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 15343159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. New perspectives on dentin adhesion--differing methods of bonding.
    Krejci I; Stavridakis M
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 12(8):727-32; quiz 734. PubMed ID: 11404868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Natural, polarized light and the choice of composite: a key to success in shade matching of direct anterior restorations- Part II.
    Manauta J; Salat A; Putignano A; Devoto W; Villares CF; Hardan LS
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2016 Dec; 39(156):5-15. PubMed ID: 30240180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.