These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25126620)

  • 1. The effects of forehead and neck position on esthetics of class I, II and III profiles.
    Salehi P; Oshagh M; Aleyasin ZS; Pakshir HR
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):412-25. PubMed ID: 25126620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of forehead and neck positions on profile esthetics.
    Oshagh M; Aleyasin ZS; Roeinpeikar M
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2012; 7(4):454-66. PubMed ID: 23150873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dentoskeletal morphology in adults with Class I, Class II Division 1, or Class II Division 2 malocclusion with increased overbite.
    Uzuner FD; Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):248-256.e2. PubMed ID: 31375235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in anteroposterior position and inclination of the maxillary incisors after surgical-orthodontic treatment of skeletal class III malocclusions.
    Zou B; Zhou Y; Lowe AA; Li H; Pliska B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):1986-93. PubMed ID: 26439521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Investigation on facial profile preferences of orthodontic patients].
    Wang YY; Guo CC; Zhou C; Fan ML; Wang WC; Bao BC
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2012 Dec; 21(6):668-72. PubMed ID: 23364553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facial attractiveness of skeletal class I and class II malocclusion as perceived by laypeople, patients and clinicians.
    Pace M; Cioffi I; D'antò V; Valletta A; Valletta R; Amato M
    Minerva Stomatol; 2018 Jun; 67(3):77-85. PubMed ID: 29308854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mandibular symphysis morphology and dimensions in different anteroposterior jaw relationships.
    Al-Khateeb SN; Al Maaitah EF; Abu Alhaija ES; Badran SA
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 23914822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the relationship between rest position of the mandible and malocclusion.
    Sperry TP
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 2774298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of mandibular rami width in patients with prognathism and retrognathia.
    Ribeiro DP; Gandelmann IH; Medeiros PJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 64(10):1506-9. PubMed ID: 16982309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal dimensions in different anteroposterior skeletal patterns.
    Abu Allhaija ES; Al-Khateeb SN
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1012-8. PubMed ID: 16448247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of 2D:4D in subjects with anteroposterior mandibular dysplasia.
    Premkumar S; Gurumurthy B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):582-5. PubMed ID: 24309331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of the Pi analysis in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.
    Kumar S; Valiathan A; Gautam P; Chakravarthy K; Jayaswal P
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23269690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Profile types in relation to facial angle in different skeletal jaw relationships].
    Blazeyĭ Z; Tanic T; Radojicic J
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2009; 88(6):66-72. PubMed ID: 20081785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Analysis of variation of sagittal position of the jaw bones in skeletal Class III malocclusion].
    Stojanović Z; Nikolić P; Nikodijević A; Milić J; Duka M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2012 Dec; 69(12):1039-45. PubMed ID: 23424956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Influence of chin prominence on anterior-posterior lip positions of facial profile].
    Su YY; Wang CL; Liu DX; Dong RP; Li H
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Dec; 17(6):598-602. PubMed ID: 19148446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of anteroposterior lip positions in the most-favored Iranian facial profiles using silhouette.
    Sodagar A; Borujeni DG
    J Dent (Tehran); 2013 Sep; 10(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 24910646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative comparison of computerized discrete and animated profile preferences.
    Giddon DB; Sconzo R; Kinchen JA; Evans CA
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(6):441-8. PubMed ID: 8974180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class I and Class III malocclusion sub-groupings related to headform type.
    Martone VD; Enlow DH; Hans MG; Broadbent BH; Oyen O
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(1):35-42; discussion 43-4. PubMed ID: 1554161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in attractiveness comparing female profile modifications of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Yüksel AG; Iskender SY; Kuitert R; Papadopoulou AK; Dalci K; Darendeliler MA; Dalci O
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Oct; 152(4):471-476. PubMed ID: 28962730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.