These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25126620)

  • 21. Objective measures as indicators for facial esthetics in white adolescents.
    Kiekens RM; Maltha JC; van't Hof MA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):551-6. PubMed ID: 16808558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Anteroposterior dental arch and jaw-base relationships in a population sample.
    Zhou L; Mok CW; Hägg U; McGrath C; Bendeus M; Wu J
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 18947277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):661-73. PubMed ID: 9637570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cranial base, sagittal jaw relationship and occlusion. A radiological-craniometric appraisal.
    Varjanne I; Koski K
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1982; 78(4):179-83. PubMed ID: 7156124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the Beta angle.
    Baik CY; Ververidou M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 15224065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. General anesthesia in orthognathic surgeries: does it affect horizontal jaw relations?
    Yaghmaei M; Ejlali M; Nikzad S; Sayyedi A; Shafaeifard S; Pourdanesh F
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(10):1752-6. PubMed ID: 23850040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnosis of Class III malocclusion in 7- to 8-year-old children--a 3D evaluation.
    Krneta B; Zhurov A; Richmond S; Ovsenik M
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Aug; 37(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 25336564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perception of facial esthetics by different observer groups of Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrusion.
    Ribas J; Paço M; Pinho T
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2018; 13(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 29687099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of the mandibular position in malocclusion patients.
    He H; Fu M
    Chin J Dent Res; 2000 May; 3(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 11314339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Anteroposterior jaw position in persons with skeletal class I].
    Vucinić P; Vukić-Culafić B
    Med Pregl; 2004; 57(9-10):434-8. PubMed ID: 15675614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The position of the occlusal plane in dentulous subjects with various skeletal jaw-relationships.
    Sinobad D
    J Oral Rehabil; 1988 Sep; 15(5):489-98. PubMed ID: 3244056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Esthetic perception of facial profile after treatment with the Thurow Appliance.
    Pithon MM; Lacerda-Santos R; Oliveira DL; Alves JV; Britto JP; Souza Eda S; Alves LP; Barbosa G; Coqueiro Rda S; Santos AF
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of cervical posture of children in skeletal class I, II, and III.
    D'Attilio M; Caputi S; Epifania E; Festa F; Tecco S
    Cranio; 2005 Jul; 23(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16128357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of facial convexity on facial attractiveness in Japanese.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Nov; 10(4):181-6. PubMed ID: 17973684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Analysis of mandibular position of patients with angles Class I and Class II, division 1 malocclusion].
    He H; Fu M
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Sep; 36(5):367-70. PubMed ID: 11769653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Silhouette profiles in the assessment of facial esthetics: a comparison of cases treated with various orthodontic appliances.
    Barrer JG; Ghafari J
    Am J Orthod; 1985 May; 87(5):385-91. PubMed ID: 3857863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of incisor position on the self-perceived psychosocial impacts of malocclusion among Chinese young adults.
    Dahong X; Xiangrong C; Ying L; Yusong L; Ying G; Yan S
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Jul; 83(4):617-22. PubMed ID: 23163832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Contribution of three dimensional cephalometry in the study of determining morphological parameters for facial esthetics].
    Zribi A; Faure J
    Orthod Fr; 2014 Mar; 85(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 24685249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mandibular form and position in 10-year-old boys.
    Kerr WJ; Miller S; Ayme B; Wilhelm N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 8059745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Experimental research on the peculiarity and esthetic effect of the neck-jaw angle].
    Rossiwall B; Zimmermann SC
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1984 Apr; 45(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 6590442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.