243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25126621)
1. Comparison of marginal fit of Lava CAD/CAM crown-copings with two finish lines.
Re D; Cerutti F; Augusti G; Cerutti A; Augusti D
Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 25126621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide crowns in preparations with two different finish lines.
Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Brufau-de Barberà M; Gomes-Azevedo S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 22372886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of veneering on the marginal fit of CAD/CAM-generated, copy-milled, and cast metal copings.
Ates SM; Yesil Duymus Z; Caglar I; Hologlu B
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2553-2560. PubMed ID: 28091875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal and internal adaptation of milled cobalt-chromium copings.
Kane LM; Chronaios D; Sierraalta M; George FM
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 26182851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal Discrepancies of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: The Influence of Preparation Designs and Sintering Techniques.
Ahmed WM; Abdallah MN; McCullagh AP; Wyatt CCL; Troczynski T; Carvalho RM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):288-298. PubMed ID: 30656786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM crowns with different finish lines by using a micro-CT technique.
Rizonaki M; Jacquet W; Bottenberg P; Depla L; Boone M; De Coster PJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):890-898. PubMed ID: 33541816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the marginal fit of a CAD/CAM zirconia-based ceramic crown system.
Baig MR; Al-Tarakemah Y; Kasim NHA; Omar R
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(3):319–329. PubMed ID: 33616567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal and internal discrepancies of zirconia copings: effects of milling system and finish line design.
Ribeiro IL; Campos F; Sousa RS; Alves ML; Rodrigues DM; Souza RO; Bottino MA
Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 25961609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal and internal adaptation of zirconium dioxide ceramic copings and crowns with different finish line designs.
Komine F; Iwai T; Kobayashi K; Matsumura H
Dent Mater J; 2007 Sep; 26(5):659-64. PubMed ID: 18203465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD/CAM system.
Souza RO; Özcan M; Pavanelli CA; Buso L; Lombardo GH; Michida SM; Mesquita AM; Bottino MA
J Prosthodont; 2012 Feb; 21(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 22050205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro evaluation of the internal and marginal misfit of CAD/CAM zirconia copings.
Lins L; Bemfica V; Queiroz C; Canabarro A
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 25453562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An In Vivo Evaluation of the Fit of Zirconium-Oxide Based, Ceramic Single Crowns with Vertical and Horizontal Finish Line Preparations.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S; Biscaro L; Stellini E
J Prosthodont; 2015 Dec; 24(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 26359654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between five CAD/CAM systems for fit of zirconia copings.
Habib SR; Al Otaibi AK; Al Anazi TA; Al Anazi SM
Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(6):437-444. PubMed ID: 29756132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of the crown preparation margin and die type on the marginal accuracy of fiber-reinforced composite crowns.
Ayad MF
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 18264520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents: an in vitro evaluation.
Quintas AF; Oliveira F; Bottino MA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 15343160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
