These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25126752)

  • 1. Attentional cueing by cross-modal congruency produces both facilitation and inhibition on short-term visual recognition.
    Makovac E; Kwok SC; Gerbino W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Oct; 152():75-83. PubMed ID: 25126752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A biphasic effect of cross-modal priming on visual shape recognition.
    Kwok SC; Fantoni C; Tamburini L; Wang L; Gerbino W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():43-50. PubMed ID: 29324235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facilitation and inhibition caused by the orienting of attention in propositional reasoning tasks.
    Cherubini P; Mazzocco A; Minelli S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Nov; 60(11):1496-523. PubMed ID: 17853220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the switching of the focus of attention within working memory: A combined event-related potential and behavioral study.
    Frenken M; Berti S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():30-41. PubMed ID: 29476873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task-dependent effects of voluntary space-based and involuntary feature-based attention on visual working memory.
    Qian J; Zhang K; Lei Q; Han Y; Li W
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1304-1319. PubMed ID: 30840142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The neural correlates of attention orienting in visuospatial working memory for detecting feature and conjunction changes.
    Yeh YY; Kuo BC; Liu HL
    Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 1130(1):146-57. PubMed ID: 17173876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The neglected contribution of memory encoding in spatial cueing: A new theory of costs and benefits.
    Chen H; Wyble B
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Nov; 125(6):936-968. PubMed ID: 30080067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual load affects exogenous spatial orienting while working memory load does not.
    Santangelo V; Finoia P; Raffone A; Belardinelli MO; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 17763843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exogenous attention influences visual short-term memory in infants.
    Ross-Sheehy S; Oakes LM; Luck SJ
    Dev Sci; 2011 May; 14(3):490-501. PubMed ID: 21477189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual working memory load disrupts the space-based attentional guidance of target selection.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):357-371. PubMed ID: 29943810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection.
    Pan Y; Xu B; Soto D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1123-31. PubMed ID: 19142832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of central and peripheral cueing on perceptual and saccade performance.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():26-33. PubMed ID: 29262304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the fate of non-cued mental representations in visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence by a retro-cuing paradigm.
    Schneider D; Mertes C; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 293():114-24. PubMed ID: 26196953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural mechanisms by which attention modulates the comparison of remembered and perceptual representations.
    Kuo BC; Astle DE
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86666. PubMed ID: 24466193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variation in the use of cues to guide visual working memory.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1652-1665. PubMed ID: 28547679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inhibition of return exaggerates change blindness.
    Smith DT; Schenk T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 20336583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What we remember affects how we see: spatial working memory steers saccade programming.
    Wong JH; Peterson MS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Feb; 75(2):308-21. PubMed ID: 23093301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.