131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25127325)
1. FS4, FS4-p, and FSP: a 4-month crossover study of 3 fine structure sound-coding strategies.
Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Blineder M; Honeder C; Ehrenreich I; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):e272-81. PubMed ID: 25127325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Formant frequency discrimination with a fine structure sound coding strategy for cochlear implants.
Liepins R; Kaider A; Honeder C; Auinger AB; Dahm V; Riss D; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 392():107970. PubMed ID: 32339775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Effects of Two Cochlear Implant Fine Structure Coding Strategies on Speech Perception.
Müller V; Klünter HD; Fürstenberg D; Walger M; Lang-Roth R
Am J Audiol; 2020 Jun; 29(2):226-235. PubMed ID: 32464082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Stimulation Rate With the FS4 and HDCIS Coding Strategies in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Blineder M; Flak S; Baumgartner WD; Kaider A; Arnoldner C
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Aug; 37(7):882-8. PubMed ID: 27295444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison in Bass Frequency Perception Between Fine Structure Processing and High-Definition Continuous Interleaved Sampling Strategies.
Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 25906173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech and music perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy: preliminary results.
Arnoldner C; Riss D; Brunner M; Durisin M; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS
Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Dec; 127(12):1298-303. PubMed ID: 17851892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Speech and pitch perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy].
Gu P; Xi X; Han D; Hong M; Wang Q; Yang S; Dai P
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 May; 27(10):481-4. PubMed ID: 23937013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Examination of Prosody and Timbre Perception in Adults With Cochlear Implants Comparing Different Fine Structure Coding Strategies.
Müller V; Klünter H; Fürstenberg D; Meister H; Walger M; Lang-Roth R
Am J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 27(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 29536106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term improvement of speech perception with the fine structure processing coding strategy in cochlear implants.
Kleine Punte A; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2014; 76(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 24685836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cochlear implants with fine structure processing improve speech and tone perception in Mandarin-speaking adults.
Chen X; Liu B; Liu S; Mo L; Li Y; Kong Y; Zheng J; Li Y; Gong S; Han D
Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Jul; 133(7):733-8. PubMed ID: 23768059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new fine structure speech coding strategy: speech perception at a reduced number of channels.
Riss D; Arnoldner C; Baumgartner WD; Kaider A; Hamzavi JS
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Sep; 29(6):784-8. PubMed ID: 18667945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Envelope versus fine structure speech coding strategy: a crossover study.
Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Selberherr A; Kaider A; Blineder M; Starlinger V; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1094-101. PubMed ID: 21817932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effects of temporal fine structure stimulation on Mandarin identification in cochlear implant users].
Qi B; Liu B; Dong R; Krenmayr A; Chen X; Wang S
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Apr; 49(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 24931017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical trial results with the MED-EL fine structure processing coding strategy in experienced cochlear implant users.
Müller J; Brill S; Hagen R; Moeltner A; Brockmeier SJ; Stark T; Helbig S; Maurer J; Zahnert T; Zierhofer C; Nopp P; Anderson I
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2012; 74(4):185-98. PubMed ID: 22814383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefits of the HiRes 120 coding strategy combined with the Harmony processor in an adult European multicentre study.
Büchner A; Lenarz T; Boermans PP; Frijns JH; Mancini P; Filipo R; Fielden C; Cooper H; Eklöf M; Freijd A; Lombaard S; Meerton L; Pickerill M; Vanat Z; Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Kienast B; Boyle P; Arnold L; Meyer B; Sterkers O; Müller-Deile J; Ambrosch P; Helbig S; Frachet B; Gallego S; Truy E; Jeffs E; Morant A; Marco J
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 132(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 22074015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A music quality rating test battery for cochlear implant users to compare the FSP and HDCIS strategies for music appreciation.
Looi V; Winter P; Anderson I; Sucher C
Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):503-18. PubMed ID: 21689048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech recognition outcomes in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with fine structure processing.
Qi B; Liu Z; Gu X; Liu B
Acta Otolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 137(3):286-292. PubMed ID: 27701966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improvements in speech perception after the upgrade from the TEMPO+ to the OPUS 2 audio processor.
Seebens Y; Diller G
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2012; 74(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 22094825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fine structure processing improves telephone speech perception in cochlear implant users.
Galindo J; Lassaletta L; Mora RP; Castro A; Bastarrica M; Gavilán J
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Mar; 270(4):1223-9. PubMed ID: 22766835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conversion of adult Nucleus® 5 cochlear implant users to the Nucleus® 6 system.
De Ceulaer G; Swinnen F; Pascoal D; Philips B; Killian M; James C; Govaerts PJ; Dhooge I
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jul; 16(4):222-32. PubMed ID: 25284643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
