318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25127846)
1. Use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for intramammary cancer staging: preliminary results.
Blum KS; Rubbert C; Mathys B; Antoch G; Mohrmann S; Obenauer S
Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1363-9. PubMed ID: 25127846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Does mammography provide additional clinical benefits or can some radiation exposure be avoided?
Fallenberg EM; Dromain C; Diekmann F; Renz DM; Amer H; Ingold-Heppner B; Neumann AU; Winzer KJ; Bick U; Hamm B; Engelken F
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Jul; 146(2):371-81. PubMed ID: 24986697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): A retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions.
Li L; Roth R; Germaine P; Ren S; Lee M; Hunter K; Tinney E; Liao L
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Feb; 98(2):113-123. PubMed ID: 27687829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced dual-energy spectral mammography (CESM): a retrospective study involving 644 breast lesions.
Travieso-Aja MDM; Maldonado-Saluzzi D; Naranjo-Santana P; Fernández-Ruiz C; Severino-Rondón W; Rodríguez Rodríguez M; Vega Benítez V; Pérez-Luzardo O
Radiol Med; 2019 Oct; 124(10):1006-1017. PubMed ID: 31250270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Staging of breast cancer and the advanced applications of digital mammogram: what the physician needs to know?
Helal MH; Mansour SM; Zaglol M; Salaleldin LA; Nada OM; Haggag MA
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160717. PubMed ID: 28055247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of contrast-enhanced spectral mammogram (CESM) and three-dimensional breast ultrasound (3DUS) on the characterization of the disease extend in cancer patients.
Helal MH; Mansour SM; Salaleldin LA; Alkalaawy BM; Salem DS; Mokhtar NM
Br J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 91(1087):20170977. PubMed ID: 29641226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Mammography, Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography and Ultrasonography in a Group of 116 patients.
Luczyńska E; Heinze S; Adamczyk A; Rys J; Mitus JW; Hendrick E
Anticancer Res; 2016 Aug; 36(8):4359-66. PubMed ID: 27466557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical utility of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast microcalcifications without associated mass: a preliminary analysis.
Cheung YC; Tsai HP; Lo YF; Ueng SH; Huang PC; Chen SC
Eur Radiol; 2016 Apr; 26(4):1082-9. PubMed ID: 26159872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in neoadjuvant chemotherapy monitoring: a comparison with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Iotti V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Coriani C; Caffarri S; Sghedoni R; Nitrosi A; Ragazzi M; Gasparini E; Masini C; Bisagni G; Falco G; Ferrari G; Braglia L; Del Prato A; Malavolti I; Ginocchi V; Pattacini P
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Sep; 19(1):106. PubMed ID: 28893303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: an emerging new tool in the clinician's arsenal.
Keller BM
Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1361-2. PubMed ID: 25300719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Comparison to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Lesions.
Xing D; Lv Y; Sun B; Xie H; Dong J; Hao C; Chen Q; Chi X
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2019; 43(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 30531546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography: Technique, Indications, and Clinical Applications.
Bhimani C; Matta D; Roth RG; Liao L; Tinney E; Brill K; Germaine P
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):84-88. PubMed ID: 27773458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Classification of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images.
Perek S; Kiryati N; Zimmerman-Moreno G; Sklair-Levy M; Konen E; Mayer A
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 30367322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography improves diagnostic accuracy in the symptomatic setting.
Tennant SL; James JJ; Cornford EJ; Chen Y; Burrell HC; Hamilton LJ; Girio-Fragkoulakis C
Clin Radiol; 2016 Nov; 71(11):1148-55. PubMed ID: 27296475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Degree of Enhancement on Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) and Lesion Type on Mammography (MG): Comparison Based on Histological Results.
Łuczyńska E; Niemiec J; Hendrick E; Heinze S; Jaszczyński J; Jakubowicz J; Sas-Korczyńska B; Rys J
Med Sci Monit; 2016 Oct; 22():3886-3893. PubMed ID: 27768681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative staging by multimodal imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer: Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography compared to conventional mammography, ultrasound, and MRI.
Daniaux M; Gruber L; De Zordo T; Geiger-Gritsch S; Amort B; Santner W; Egle D; Baltzer PAT
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Jun; 163():110838. PubMed ID: 37080064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.
Łuczyńska E; Heinze-Paluchowska S; Hendrick E; Dyczek S; Ryś J; Herman K; Blecharz P; Jakubowicz J
Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1358-67. PubMed ID: 25963880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing tumor extent on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus full-field digital mammography and ultrasound.
Patel BK; Garza SA; Eversman S; Lopez-Alvarez Y; Kosiorek H; Pockaj BA
Clin Imaging; 2017; 46():78-84. PubMed ID: 28750354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size.
Fallenberg EM; Dromain C; Diekmann F; Engelken F; Krohn M; Singh JM; Ingold-Heppner B; Winzer KJ; Bick U; Renz DM
Eur Radiol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):256-64. PubMed ID: 24048724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
