These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25129251)

  • 1. Influence of bone parameters on peri-implant bone strain distribution in the posterior mandible.
    Sugiura T; Yamamoto K; Kawakami M; Horita S; Murakami K; Kirita T
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2015 Jan; 20(1):e66-73. PubMed ID: 25129251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of bone density and crestal cortical bone thickness on micromotion and peri-implant bone strain distribution in an immediately loaded implant: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Sugiura T; Yamamoto K; Horita S; Murakami K; Tsutsumi S; Kirita T
    J Periodontal Implant Sci; 2016 Jun; 46(3):152-65. PubMed ID: 27382504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of Crestal Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Site: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Gupta A; Rathee S; Agarwal J; Pachar RB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep; 18(9):785-789. PubMed ID: 28874642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stress and Strain Distribution Patterns in Bone around Splinted Standard and Short Implants Placed at the Crestal Level and Subcrestally using Three- Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Amid R; Rasoolzadeh RA; Motlagh AM; Dehnavi F; Kadkhodazadeh M
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2017; 27(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 29604944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest.
    Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Souza JCM; Alves JL; López-López J; Henriques B
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Sep; 21(12):655-662. PubMed ID: 30693810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation between the thickness of the crestal and buccolingual cortical bone at varying depths and implant stability quotients.
    Chatvaratthana K; Thaworanunta S; Seriwatanachai D; Wongsirichat N
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0190293. PubMed ID: 29281715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
    Petrie CS; Williams JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 16117775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probabilistic analysis of peri-implant strain predictions as influenced by uncertainties in bone properties and occlusal forces.
    Petrie CS; Williams JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 17590159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Micromotion analysis of different implant configuration, bone density, and crestal cortical bone thickness in immediately loaded mandibular full-arch implant restorations: A nonlinear finite element study.
    Sugiura T; Yamamoto K; Horita S; Murakami K; Kirita T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 29214714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA; Geramy A; Yaghobee S; Khorsand A; Yousefifakhr H; Rokn A; Soolari A
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 17(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26233968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
    Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of maxillary cortical bone thickness, implant design and implant diameter on stress around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Okumura N; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Kurokawa K; Nomura S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2010 Jul; 54(3):133-42. PubMed ID: 20153281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A retrospective radiographic analysis of bone loss following placement of TiO2 grit-blasted implants in the posterior maxilla and mandible.
    Warren P; Chaffee N; Felton DA; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 12074456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of multiple implant-bone parameters on stress characteristics in the mandible under traumatic loading conditions.
    Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):461-72. PubMed ID: 20556244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 3-D Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution on Implant-supported Fixed Prosthesis with Four Different Commercially Available Implant Systems.
    Tyagi R; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Malethia A; Saini N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):835-840. PubMed ID: 33568601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variations in crestal cortical bone thickness at dental implant sites in different regions of the jawbone.
    Ko YC; Huang HL; Shen YW; Cai JY; Fuh LJ; Hsu JT
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Jun; 19(3):440-446. PubMed ID: 28074591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of cortical zone level and prosthetic platform angle in dental implant mechanical response: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Ausiello P; Tribst JPM; Ventre M; Salvati E; di Lauro AE; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2021 Nov; 37(11):1688-1697. PubMed ID: 34497022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of different abutment diameter of implants on the peri-implant stress in the crestal bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis--In vitro study.
    Aradya A; Kumar UK; Chowdhary R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 27054866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching: different mismatch sizes, connection types, and implant protocols.
    Pessoa RS; Bezerra FJ; Sousa RM; Vander Sloten J; Casati MZ; Jaecques SV
    J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):1161-71. PubMed ID: 24635544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.