BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25130313)

  • 1. Sensory modality-specific spatio-temporal dynamics in response to counting tasks.
    Gohel B; Jeong Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Oct; 581():20-5. PubMed ID: 25130313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modality-specific spectral dynamics in response to visual and tactile sequential shape information processing tasks: An MEG study using multivariate pattern classification analysis.
    Gohel B; Lee P; Jeong Y
    Brain Res; 2016 Aug; 1644():39-52. PubMed ID: 27134037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cortical EEG components that reflect inverse effectiveness during visuotactile integration processing.
    Kanayama N; Kimura K; Hiraki K
    Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 1598():18-30. PubMed ID: 25514335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Change-driven cortical activation in multisensory environments: an MEG study.
    Tanaka E; Kida T; Inui K; Kakigi R
    Neuroimage; 2009 Nov; 48(2):464-74. PubMed ID: 19559795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual dominance and multisensory integration changes with age.
    Diaconescu AO; Hasher L; McIntosh AR
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():152-66. PubMed ID: 23036447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual, auditory and tactile stimuli compete for early sensory processing capacities within but not between senses.
    Porcu E; Keitel C; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 97():224-35. PubMed ID: 24736186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modality-specific sensory readiness for upcoming events revealed by slow cortical potentials.
    Bianco V; Perri RL; Berchicci M; Quinzi F; Spinelli D; Di Russo F
    Brain Struct Funct; 2020 Jan; 225(1):149-159. PubMed ID: 31784812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensory Target Detection at Local and Global Timescales Reveals a Hierarchy of Supramodal Dynamics in the Human Cortex.
    Niedernhuber M; Raimondo F; Sitt JD; Bekinschtein TA
    J Neurosci; 2022 Nov; 42(46):8729-8741. PubMed ID: 36223999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imagery and retrieval of auditory and visual information: neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful performance.
    Huijbers W; Pennartz CM; Rubin DC; Daselaar SM
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1730-40. PubMed ID: 21396384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The co-occurrence of multisensory facilitation and cross-modal conflict in the human brain.
    Diaconescu AO; Alain C; McIntosh AR
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 106(6):2896-909. PubMed ID: 21880944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Haptic and visual information speed up the neural processing of auditory speech in live dyadic interactions.
    Treille A; Cordeboeuf C; Vilain C; Sato M
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 May; 57():71-7. PubMed ID: 24530236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-modal processing of auditory-visual stimuli in a no-task paradigm: a topographic event-related potential study.
    Vidal J; Giard MH; Roux S; Barthélémy C; Bruneau N
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Apr; 119(4):763-71. PubMed ID: 18289935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Steady state responses to temporally congruent and incongruent auditory and vibrotactile amplitude modulated stimulation.
    Budd TW; Timora JR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):419-32. PubMed ID: 23769951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The left fusiform gyrus hosts trisensory representations of manipulable objects.
    Kassuba T; Klinge C; Hölig C; Menz MM; Ptito M; Röder B; Siebner HR
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1566-77. PubMed ID: 21334444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Crossmodal and intermodal attention modulate event-related brain potentials to tactile and auditory stimuli.
    Hötting K; Rösler F; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jan; 148(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 12478394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of mechanical tactile noise on amplitude of visual evoked potentials: multisensory stochastic resonance.
    Méndez-Balbuena I; Huidobro N; Silva M; Flores A; Trenado C; Quintanar L; Arias-Carrión O; Kristeva R; Manjarrez E
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Oct; 114(4):2132-43. PubMed ID: 26156387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multisensory integration after traumatic brain injury: a reaction time study between pairings of vision, touch and audition.
    Sarno S; Erasmus LP; Lipp B; Schlaegel W
    Brain Inj; 2003 May; 17(5):413-26. PubMed ID: 12745713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Isolating the neural mechanisms of interference during continuous multisensory dual-task performance.
    Kasper RW; Cecotti H; Touryan J; Eckstein MP; Giesbrecht B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):476-89. PubMed ID: 24047391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Basic multisensory functions can be acquired after congenital visual pattern deprivation in humans.
    Putzar L; Gondan M; Röder B
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2012; 37(8):697-711. PubMed ID: 23145567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.