339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25130435)
1. Phylogeny suggests nondirectional and isometric evolution of sexual size dimorphism in argiopine spiders.
Cheng RC; Kuntner M
Evolution; 2014 Oct; 68(10):2861-72. PubMed ID: 25130435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A molecular phylogeny of nephilid spiders: evolutionary history of a model lineage.
Kuntner M; Arnedo MA; Trontelj P; Lokovšek T; Agnarsson I
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2013 Dec; 69(3):961-79. PubMed ID: 23811436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Golden Orbweavers Ignore Biological Rules: Phylogenomic and Comparative Analyses Unravel a Complex Evolution of Sexual Size Dimorphism.
Kuntner M; Hamilton CA; Cheng RC; Gregorič M; Lupše N; Lokovšek T; Lemmon EM; Lemmon AR; Agnarsson I; Coddington JA; Bond JE
Syst Biol; 2019 Jul; 68(4):555-572. PubMed ID: 30517732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sexual selection, sexual size dimorphism and Rensch's rule in Odonata.
Serrano-Meneses MA; Córdoba-Aguilar A; Azpilicueta-Amorín M; González-Soriano E; Székely T
J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1259-73. PubMed ID: 18636976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rensch's rule inverted--female-driven gigantism in nine-spined stickleback Pungitius pungitius.
Herczeg G; Gonda A; Merilä J
J Anim Ecol; 2010 May; 79(3):581-8. PubMed ID: 20202005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Andrew meets Rensch: sexual size dimorphism and the inverse of Rensch's rule in Andrew's toad (Bufo andrewsi).
Liao WB; Liu WC; Merilä J
Oecologia; 2015 Feb; 177(2):389-99. PubMed ID: 25407623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlated evolution of allometry and sexual dimorphism across higher taxa.
De Lisle SP; Rowe L
Am Nat; 2013 Nov; 182(5):630-9. PubMed ID: 24107370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ecological divergence and sexual selection drive sexual size dimorphism in New World pitvipers (Serpentes: Viperidae).
Hendry CR; Guiher TJ; Pyron RA
J Evol Biol; 2014 Apr; 27(4):760-71. PubMed ID: 24597708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evolution of sexual size dimorphisms in emydid turtles: ecological dimorphism, rensch's rule, and sympatric divergence.
Stephens PR; Wiens JJ
Evolution; 2009 Apr; 63(4):910-25. PubMed ID: 19210531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimal climbing speed explains the evolution of extreme sexual size dimorphism in spiders.
Moya-Laraño J; Vinković D; Allard CM; Foellmer MW
J Evol Biol; 2009 May; 22(5):954-63. PubMed ID: 19243487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ecological drivers of body size evolution and sexual size dimorphism in short-horned grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae).
García-Navas V; Noguerales V; Cordero PJ; Ortego J
J Evol Biol; 2017 Aug; 30(8):1592-1608. PubMed ID: 28609564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Have male and female genitalia coevolved? A phylogenetic analysis of genitalic morphology and sexual size dimorphism in web-building spiders (Araneae: Araneoidea).
Ramos M; Coddington JA; Christenson TE; Irschick DJ
Evolution; 2005 Sep; 59(9):1989-99. PubMed ID: 16261736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coevolution of female and male genital components to avoid genital size mismatches in sexually dimorphic spiders.
Lupše N; Cheng RC; Kuntner M
BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):161. PubMed ID: 27535025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The phylogenetic basis of sexual size dimorphism in orb-weaving spiders (Araneae, Orbiculariae).
Hormiga G; Scharff N; Coddington JA
Syst Biol; 2000 Sep; 49(3):435-62. PubMed ID: 12116421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proximate causes of Rensch's rule: does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time?
Blanckenhorn WU; Dixon AF; Fairbairn DJ; Foellmer MW; Gibert P; van der Linde K; Meier R; Nylin S; Pitnick S; Schoff C; Signorelli M; Teder T; Wiklund C
Am Nat; 2007 Feb; 169(2):245-57. PubMed ID: 17211807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The eunuch phenomenon: adaptive evolution of genital emasculation in sexually dimorphic spiders.
Kuntner M; Agnarsson I; Li D
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2015 Feb; 90(1):279-96. PubMed ID: 24809822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Macroevolutionary Patterns of Sexual Size Dimorphism Among African Tree Frogs (Family: Hyperoliidae).
Portik DM; Blackburn DC; McGuire JA
J Hered; 2020 Aug; 111(4):379-391. PubMed ID: 32594138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in grouse and allies (Aves: Phasianidae) in relation to mating competition, fecundity demands and resource division.
Lislevand T; Figuerola J; Székely T
J Evol Biol; 2009 Sep; 22(9):1895-905. PubMed ID: 19682306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sexual size dimorphism in a Drosophila clade, the D. obscura group.
Huey RB; Moreteau B; Moreteau JC; Gibert P; Gilchrist GW; Ives AR; Garland T; David JR
Zoology (Jena); 2006; 109(4):318-30. PubMed ID: 16978850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lack of support for Rensch's rule in an intraspecific test using red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum) populations.
Martin OY; Michalczyk Ł; Millard AL; Emerson BC; Gage MJ
Insect Sci; 2017 Feb; 24(1):133-140. PubMed ID: 26299521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
