These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25131649)
1. Variation of system performance, quality control standards and adherence to international FDG-PET/CT imaging guidelines. A national survey of PET/CT operations in Austria. Rausch I; Bergmann H; Geist B; Schaffarich M; Hirtl A; Hacker M; Beyer T Nuklearmedizin; 2014; 53(6):242-8. PubMed ID: 25131649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of different contrast medium concentrations and injection protocols on quantitative and clinical assessment of FDG-PET/CT in lung cancer. Verburg FA; Kuhl CK; Pietsch H; Palmowski M; Mottaghy FM; Behrendt FF Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e617-22. PubMed ID: 23880426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standardization of image quality across multiple centers by optimization of acquisition and reconstruction parameters with interim FDG-PET/CT for evaluating diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Daisaki H; Tateishi U; Terauchi T; Tatsumi M; Suzuki K; Shimada N; Nishida H; Numata A; Kato K; Akashi K; Harada M Ann Nucl Med; 2013 Apr; 27(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 23264065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues. Pace L; Nicolai E; Luongo A; Aiello M; Catalano OA; Soricelli A; Salvatore M Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 24331845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer with low FDG uptake: characterization by means of dual-time point FDG-PET/CT. Zytoon AA; Murakami K; El-Kholy MR; El-Shorbagy E; Ebied O Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 70(3):530-8. PubMed ID: 18395387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality control for quantitative multicenter whole-body PET/MR studies: A NEMA image quality phantom study with three current PET/MR systems. Boellaard R; Rausch I; Beyer T; Delso G; Yaqub M; Quick HH; Sattler B Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5961-9. PubMed ID: 26429271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Standardization of quantitative imaging: the time is right, and 18F-FDG PET/CT is a good place to start. Buckler AJ; Boellaard R J Nucl Med; 2011 Feb; 52(2):171-2. PubMed ID: 21233179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT versus dynamic breast MRI of suspicious breast lesions. Imbriaco M; Caprio MG; Limite G; Pace L; De Falco T; Capuano E; Salvatore M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1323-30. PubMed ID: 18941064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ionising radiation-free whole-body MRI versus (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT scans for children and young adults with cancer: a prospective, non-randomised, single-centre study. Klenk C; Gawande R; Uslu L; Khurana A; Qiu D; Quon A; Donig J; Rosenberg J; Luna-Fineman S; Moseley M; Daldrup-Link HE Lancet Oncol; 2014 Mar; 15(3):275-85. PubMed ID: 24559803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of F-18-FDG PET/CT findings between pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumor and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Kim YI; Kim SK; Paeng JC; Lee HY Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):231-5. PubMed ID: 24290142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Standardization and quantification in FDG-PET/CT imaging for staging and restaging of malignant disease. Gámez-Cenzano C; Pino-Sorroche F PET Clin; 2014 Apr; 9(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 25030277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. F-18 FDG PET/CT in the management of thyroid cancer. Iagaru A; Kalinyak JE; McDougall IR Clin Nucl Med; 2007 Sep; 32(9):690-5. PubMed ID: 17710020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the standardized uptake value (SUV) in hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions: initial results. Heusch P; Buchbender C; Köhler J; Nensa F; Beiderwellen K; Kühl H; Lanzman RS; Wittsack HJ; Gomez B; Gauler T; Schuler M; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Heusner TA Rofo; 2013 Nov; 185(11):1056-62. PubMed ID: 23860802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standardized uptake value based evaluation of lymphoma by FDG and FLT PET/CT. Wang R; Zhu H; Chen Y; Li C; Li F; Shen Z; Tian J; Yu L; Xu B Hematol Oncol; 2014 Sep; 32(3):126-32. PubMed ID: 23996464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Standardized uptake values for [¹⁸F] FDG in normal organ tissues: comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI. Heusch P; Buchbender C; Beiderwellen K; Nensa F; Hartung-Knemeyer V; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Forsting M; Antoch G; Heusner TA Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):870-6. PubMed ID: 23394765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiation exposure of patients undergoing whole-body FDG-PET/CT examinations: an update pursuant to the new ICRP recommendations. Brix G; Nosske D; Lechel U Nuklearmedizin; 2014; 53(5):217-20. PubMed ID: 24919708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) on management of patients with carcinoma invading bladder muscle. Mertens LS; Fioole-Bruining A; Vegt E; Vogel WV; van Rhijn BW; Horenblas S BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 23790129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation of 18F-FDG 3D mode PET image quality versus acquisition time. Brown C; Dempsey MF; Gillen G; Elliott AT Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Mar; 31(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 20032801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]