218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25131649)
1. Variation of system performance, quality control standards and adherence to international FDG-PET/CT imaging guidelines. A national survey of PET/CT operations in Austria.
Rausch I; Bergmann H; Geist B; Schaffarich M; Hirtl A; Hacker M; Beyer T
Nuklearmedizin; 2014; 53(6):242-8. PubMed ID: 25131649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of different contrast medium concentrations and injection protocols on quantitative and clinical assessment of FDG-PET/CT in lung cancer.
Verburg FA; Kuhl CK; Pietsch H; Palmowski M; Mottaghy FM; Behrendt FF
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e617-22. PubMed ID: 23880426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standardization of image quality across multiple centers by optimization of acquisition and reconstruction parameters with interim FDG-PET/CT for evaluating diffuse large B cell lymphoma.
Daisaki H; Tateishi U; Terauchi T; Tatsumi M; Suzuki K; Shimada N; Nishida H; Numata A; Kato K; Akashi K; Harada M
Ann Nucl Med; 2013 Apr; 27(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 23264065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues.
Pace L; Nicolai E; Luongo A; Aiello M; Catalano OA; Soricelli A; Salvatore M
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 24331845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hybrid [¹⁸F]-FDG PET/MRI including non-Gaussian diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI): preliminary results in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Heusch P; Köhler J; Wittsack HJ; Heusner TA; Buchbender C; Poeppel TD; Nensa F; Wetter A; Gauler T; Hartung V; Lanzman RS
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):2055-60. PubMed ID: 23830904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0.
Boellaard R; O'Doherty MJ; Weber WA; Mottaghy FM; Lonsdale MN; Stroobants SG; Oyen WJ; Kotzerke J; Hoekstra OS; Pruim J; Marsden PK; Tatsch K; Hoekstra CJ; Visser EP; Arends B; Verzijlbergen FJ; Zijlstra JM; Comans EF; Lammertsma AA; Paans AM; Willemsen AT; Beyer T; Bockisch A; Schaefer-Prokop C; Delbeke D; Baum RP; Chiti A; Krause BJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Jan; 37(1):181-200. PubMed ID: 19915839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer with low FDG uptake: characterization by means of dual-time point FDG-PET/CT.
Zytoon AA; Murakami K; El-Kholy MR; El-Shorbagy E; Ebied O
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 70(3):530-8. PubMed ID: 18395387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality control for quantitative multicenter whole-body PET/MR studies: A NEMA image quality phantom study with three current PET/MR systems.
Boellaard R; Rausch I; Beyer T; Delso G; Yaqub M; Quick HH; Sattler B
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5961-9. PubMed ID: 26429271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Standardization of quantitative imaging: the time is right, and 18F-FDG PET/CT is a good place to start.
Buckler AJ; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2011 Feb; 52(2):171-2. PubMed ID: 21233179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT versus dynamic breast MRI of suspicious breast lesions.
Imbriaco M; Caprio MG; Limite G; Pace L; De Falco T; Capuano E; Salvatore M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1323-30. PubMed ID: 18941064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ionising radiation-free whole-body MRI versus (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT scans for children and young adults with cancer: a prospective, non-randomised, single-centre study.
Klenk C; Gawande R; Uslu L; Khurana A; Qiu D; Quon A; Donig J; Rosenberg J; Luna-Fineman S; Moseley M; Daldrup-Link HE
Lancet Oncol; 2014 Mar; 15(3):275-85. PubMed ID: 24559803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of F-18-FDG PET/CT findings between pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumor and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Kim YI; Kim SK; Paeng JC; Lee HY
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):231-5. PubMed ID: 24290142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Standardization and quantification in FDG-PET/CT imaging for staging and restaging of malignant disease.
Gámez-Cenzano C; Pino-Sorroche F
PET Clin; 2014 Apr; 9(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 25030277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. F-18 FDG PET/CT in the management of thyroid cancer.
Iagaru A; Kalinyak JE; McDougall IR
Clin Nucl Med; 2007 Sep; 32(9):690-5. PubMed ID: 17710020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the standardized uptake value (SUV) in hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions: initial results.
Heusch P; Buchbender C; Köhler J; Nensa F; Beiderwellen K; Kühl H; Lanzman RS; Wittsack HJ; Gomez B; Gauler T; Schuler M; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Rofo; 2013 Nov; 185(11):1056-62. PubMed ID: 23860802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standardized uptake value based evaluation of lymphoma by FDG and FLT PET/CT.
Wang R; Zhu H; Chen Y; Li C; Li F; Shen Z; Tian J; Yu L; Xu B
Hematol Oncol; 2014 Sep; 32(3):126-32. PubMed ID: 23996464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Standardized uptake values for [¹⁸F] FDG in normal organ tissues: comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI.
Heusch P; Buchbender C; Beiderwellen K; Nensa F; Hartung-Knemeyer V; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Forsting M; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):870-6. PubMed ID: 23394765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiation exposure of patients undergoing whole-body FDG-PET/CT examinations: an update pursuant to the new ICRP recommendations.
Brix G; Nosske D; Lechel U
Nuklearmedizin; 2014; 53(5):217-20. PubMed ID: 24919708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) on management of patients with carcinoma invading bladder muscle.
Mertens LS; Fioole-Bruining A; Vegt E; Vogel WV; van Rhijn BW; Horenblas S
BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 23790129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation of 18F-FDG 3D mode PET image quality versus acquisition time.
Brown C; Dempsey MF; Gillen G; Elliott AT
Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Mar; 31(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 20032801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
