These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25132257)

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison of a locking compression plate combined with an intramedullary pin or a polyetheretherketone rod in a cadaveric canine tibia gap model.
    Beierer LH; Glyde M; Day RE; Hosgood GL
    Vet Surg; 2014 Nov; 43(8):1032-8. PubMed ID: 25132257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of mono- and bicortical screws in an experimentally induced gap fracture.
    Demner D; Garcia TC; Serdy MG; Hayashi K; Nir BA; Stover SM
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2014; 27(6):422-9. PubMed ID: 25327936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of intramedullary pin size and monocortical screw configuration on locking compression plate-rod constructs in an in vitro fracture gap model.
    Pearson T; Glyde M; Hosgood G; Day R
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2015; 28(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 25633043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of a 3.5-mm conical coupling plating system and a 3.5-mm locking compression plate applied as plate-rod constructs to an experimentally created fracture gap in femurs of canine cadavers.
    Tremolada G; Lewis DD; Paragnani KL; Conrad BP; Kim SE; Pozzi A
    Am J Vet Res; 2017 Jun; 78(6):712-717. PubMed ID: 28541152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of a 3.5 mm locking compression plate applied cranially and a 2.7 mm locking compression plate applied medially in a gap model of the distal aspect of the canine radius.
    Uhl JM; Kapatkin AS; Garcia TC; Stover SM
    Vet Surg; 2013 Oct; 42(7):840-6. PubMed ID: 24033354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of two alternative tibial plateau leveling osteotomy plates with the original standard in an axially loaded gap model: an in vitro study.
    Kloc PA; Kowaleski MP; Litsky AS; Brown NO; Johnson KA
    Vet Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 19152616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of screw position on single cycle to failure in bending and torsion of a locking plate-rod construct in a synthetic feline femoral gap model.
    Niederhäuser SK; Tepic S; Weber UT
    Am J Vet Res; 2015 May; 76(5):402-10. PubMed ID: 25909372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A biomechanical matched-pair comparison of two different locking plates for tibial diaphyseal comminuted fracture: carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone (CF-PEEK) versus titanium plates.
    Zhou K; He X; Tao X; Pan F; Yang H
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Nov; 15(1):558. PubMed ID: 33228695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual Bone Fixation: A Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Implant Constructs in a Mid-Diaphyseal Fracture Model of the Feline Radius and Ulna.
    Preston TJ; Glyde M; Hosgood G; Day RE
    Vet Surg; 2016 Apr; 45(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 27007749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of gourd-shaped LCP versus LCP for fixation of comminuted tibial shaft fracture.
    Xu GH; Liu B; Zhang Q; Wang J; Chen W; Liu YJ; Peng AQ; Zhang YZ
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2013 Apr; 33(2):250-257. PubMed ID: 23592139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical Comparison of Locking Compression Plate versus Positive Profile Pins and Polymethylmethacrylate for Stabilization of the Canine Lumbar Vertebrae.
    Sturges BK; Kapatkin AS; Garcia TC; Anwer C; Fukuda S; Hitchens PL; Wisner T; Hayashi K; Stover SM
    Vet Surg; 2016 Apr; 45(3):309-18. PubMed ID: 27007649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro biomechanical comparison of 3.5 string of pearl plate fixation to 3.5 locking compression plate fixation in a canine fracture gap model.
    Malenfant RC; Sod GA
    Vet Surg; 2014 May; 43(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 24720361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A biomechanical comparison of 3.5 locking compression plate fixation to 3.5 limited contact dynamic compression plate fixation in a canine cadaveric distal humeral metaphyseal gap model.
    Filipowicz D; Lanz O; McLaughlin R; Elder S; Werre S
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2009; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19597629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An anatomical study of plate-rod fixation in feline tibiae.
    Gutbrod A; Vincenti S; Kühn K; Knell SC; Schmierer PA; Pozzi A
    Vet Surg; 2017 Oct; 46(7):909-914. PubMed ID: 28640396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro biomechanical comparison of a plate-rod combination-construct and an interlocking nail-construct for experimentally induced gap fractures in canine tibiae.
    von Pfeil DJ; Déjardin LM; DeCamp CE; Meyer EG; Lansdowne JL; Weerts RJ; Haut RC
    Am J Vet Res; 2005 Sep; 66(9):1536-43. PubMed ID: 16261826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ex vivo evaluation of the biomechanical effect of varying monocortical screw numbers on a plate-rod canine femoral gap model.
    Delisser PJ; McCombe GP; Trask RS; Etches JA; German AJ; Holden SL; Wallace AM; Burton NJ
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2013; 26(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 23460373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of monocortical and bicortical screw numbers on the properties of a locking plate-intramedullary rod configuration. An in vitro study on a canine femoral fracture gap model.
    Field EJ; Parsons K; Etches JA; Hamilton K; Burton NJ
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2016 Nov; 29(6):459-465. PubMed ID: 27779272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro biomechanical comparison of 3.5 mm LC-DCP/intramedullary rod and 5 mm clamp-rod internal fixator (CRIF)/intramedullary rod fixation in a canine femoral gap model.
    Bonin GA; Baker ST; Davis CA; Bergerson CM; Hildebrandt AA; Hulse DA; Kerwin SC; Moreno MR; Saunders WB
    Vet Surg; 2014 Oct; 43(7):860-8. PubMed ID: 24484218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison between stainless steel, titanium and carbon-fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone volar locking plates for distal radius fractures.
    Mugnai R; Tarallo L; Capra F; Catani F
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Oct; 104(6):877-882. PubMed ID: 29807189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Steinmann pin augmentation versus locking plate constructs.
    Ruskin J; Caravaggi P; Beebe KS; Corgan S; Chen L; Yoon RS; Patterson FR; Hwang JS
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2016 Sep; 17(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 26883439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.