These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. The effect of intramedullary pin size and plate working length on plate strain in locking compression plate-rod constructs under axial load. Pearson T; Glyde MR; Day RE; Hosgood GL Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2016 Nov; 29(6):451-458. PubMed ID: 27709224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biomechanical testing of the LCP--how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled? Stoffel K; Dieter U; Stachowiak G; Gächter A; Kuster MS Injury; 2003 Nov; 34 Suppl 2():B11-9. PubMed ID: 14580982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanical Comparison of Two Locking Plate Constructs for the Stabilization of Feline Tibial Fractures. Hottmann NM; Johnson MD; Banks SA; Tuyn D; Lewis DD Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar; 33(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 31858511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Locked plate fixation of osteoporotic humeral shaft fractures: are two locking screws per segment enough? Hak DJ; Althausen P; Hazelwood SJ J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Apr; 24(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 20335752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone. O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Do Transcortical Screws in a Locking Plate Construct Improve the Stiffness in the Fixation of Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures? A Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Different Plating Constructs. Lochab J; Carrothers A; Wong E; McLachlin S; Aldebeyan W; Jenkinson R; Whyne C; Nousiainen MT J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Jan; 31(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 28002219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of the mechanical behaviors of semicontoured, locking plate-rod fixation and anatomically contoured, conventional plate-rod fixation applied to experimentally induced gap fractures in canine femora. Goh CS; Santoni BG; Puttlitz CM; Palmer RH Am J Vet Res; 2009 Jan; 70(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 19119945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanical Comparison of Bicortical, Unicortical, and Unicortical Far-Cortex-Abutting Screw Fixations in Plated Comminuted Midshaft Clavicle Fractures. Croley JS; Morris RP; Amin A; Lindsey RW; Gugala Z J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jun; 41(6):703-11. PubMed ID: 27113909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ex vivo cyclic mechanical behaviour of 2.4 mm locking plates compared with 2.4 mm limited contact plates in a cadaveric diaphyseal gap model. Irubetagoyena I; Verset M; Palierne S; Swider P; Autefage A Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2013; 26(6):479-88. PubMed ID: 24080774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of plate material and screw design on stiffness and ultimate load of locked plating in osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures. Katthagen JC; Schwarze M; Warnhoff M; Voigt C; Hurschler C; Lill H Injury; 2016 Mar; 47(3):617-24. PubMed ID: 26804939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A biomechanical comparison of unilateral and bilateral String-of-Pearls™ locking plates in a canine distal humeral metaphyseal gap model. Hurt RJ; Syrcle JA; Elder S; McLaughlin R Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2014; 27(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 24763388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical Comparison of Locking Compression Plate and Limited Contact Dynamic Compression Plate Combined with an Intramedullary Rod in a Canine Femoral Fracture-Gap Model. Matres-Lorenzo L; Diop A; Maurel N; Boucton MC; Bernard F; Bernardé A Vet Surg; 2016 Apr; 45(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 26909507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical Comparison of Use of Two Screws versus Three Screws Per Fragment with Locking Plate Constructs under Cyclic Loading in Compression in a Fracture Gap Model. Palierne S; Blondel M; Swider P; Autefage A Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2022 May; 35(3):166-174. PubMed ID: 35272366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Stiffness of a type II external skeletal fixator and locking compression plate in a fracture gap model. Muro NM; Gilley RS; Kemper AR; Benitez ME; Barry SL; McNally C Vet Surg; 2021 Apr; 50(3):622-632. PubMed ID: 33404123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fixation. Ponnappan RK; Serhan H; Zarda B; Patel R; Albert T; Vaccaro AR Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 18838341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mechanical Evaluation of Locking, Nonlocking, and Hybrid Plating Constructs Using a Locking Compression Plate in a Canine Synthetic Bone Model. Rowe-Guthrie KM; Markel MD; Bleedorn JA Vet Surg; 2015 Oct; 44(7):838-42. PubMed ID: 26287445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of concurrent fibular fracture on the fixation of distal tibia fractures: a laboratory comparison of intramedullary nails with locked plates. Strauss EJ; Alfonso D; Kummer FJ; Egol KA; Tejwani NC J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Mar; 21(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 17473753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In vitro biomechanical comparison of limited contat dynamic compression plate and locking compression plate. Aguila AZ; Manos JM; Orlansky AS; Todhunter RJ; Trotter EJ; Van der Meulen MC Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2005; 18(4):220-6. PubMed ID: 16594390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]