1298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25132462)
1. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after robotic-assisted hysterectomy alone or with other procedures for benign and malignant indications.
Lee SJ; Calderon B; Gardner GJ; Mays A; Nolan S; Sonoda Y; Barakat RR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jun; 133(3):552-5. PubMed ID: 24736022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Same-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Surgery Performed by Gynecologic Oncologists: A Review of Patient Selection.
Sanabria D; Rodriguez J; Pecci P; Ardila E; Pareja R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):816-825. PubMed ID: 31715304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of age on surgical staging and approaches (laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery) in endometrial cancer management.
Bourgin C; Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Foucher F; Levêque J; Lavoué V
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):703-709. PubMed ID: 27955835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Same-day discharge in clinical stage I endometrial cancer patients treated with total laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Rettenmaier MA; Mendivil AA; Brown JV; Abaid LN; Micha JP; Goldstein BH
Oncology; 2012; 82(6):321-6. PubMed ID: 22572861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.
Bergstrom J; Aloisi A; Armbruster S; Yen TT; Casarin J; Leitao MM; Tanner EJ; Matsuno R; Machado KK; Dowdy SC; Soliman PT; Wethington SL; Stone RL; Levinson KL; Fader AN
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 148(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 29338923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standardized technique of laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer optimizes the perioperative outcomes.
Kavallaris A; Kalogiannidis I; Chalvatzas N; Hornemann A; Bohlmann MK; Diedrich K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1373-80. PubMed ID: 20607263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two minimally invasive approaches to endometrial cancer staging: a single-surgeon experience.
Frey MK; Lin JF; Stewart LE; Makaroun L; Panico VJ; Holcomb K
J Reprod Med; 2015; 60(3-4):127-34. PubMed ID: 25898475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report.
Fader AN; Escobar PF
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 19481243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short- and long-term morbidity and outcomes after robotic surgery for comprehensive endometrial cancer staging.
Backes FJ; Brudie LA; Farrell MR; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ; Bigsby GE; O'Malley D; Cohn DE; Holloway RW; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 125(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 22387522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Promoting Same-Day Discharge for Gynecologic Oncology Patients in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.
Fountain CR; Havrilesky LJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):932-939. PubMed ID: 28501452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of 30-day readmission and impact of same-day discharge in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Jennings AJ; Spencer RJ; Medlin E; Rice LW; Uppal S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Sep; 213(3):344.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25981843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic surgical staging for endometrial and cervical cancers in medically ill patients.
Siesto G; Ornaghi S; Iedà N; Vitobello D
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jun; 129(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 23454499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
