These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25132462)
1. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies. Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after robotic-assisted hysterectomy alone or with other procedures for benign and malignant indications. Lee SJ; Calderon B; Gardner GJ; Mays A; Nolan S; Sonoda Y; Barakat RR; Leitao MM Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jun; 133(3):552-5. PubMed ID: 24736022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique. Scheib SA; Fader AN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Same-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Surgery Performed by Gynecologic Oncologists: A Review of Patient Selection. Sanabria D; Rodriguez J; Pecci P; Ardila E; Pareja R J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):816-825. PubMed ID: 31715304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of age on surgical staging and approaches (laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery) in endometrial cancer management. Bourgin C; Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Foucher F; Levêque J; Lavoué V Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):703-709. PubMed ID: 27955835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Same-day discharge in clinical stage I endometrial cancer patients treated with total laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. Rettenmaier MA; Mendivil AA; Brown JV; Abaid LN; Micha JP; Goldstein BH Oncology; 2012; 82(6):321-6. PubMed ID: 22572861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study. Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers. Bergstrom J; Aloisi A; Armbruster S; Yen TT; Casarin J; Leitao MM; Tanner EJ; Matsuno R; Machado KK; Dowdy SC; Soliman PT; Wethington SL; Stone RL; Levinson KL; Fader AN Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 148(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 29338923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study. Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standardized technique of laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer optimizes the perioperative outcomes. Kavallaris A; Kalogiannidis I; Chalvatzas N; Hornemann A; Bohlmann MK; Diedrich K Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1373-80. PubMed ID: 20607263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy? Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two minimally invasive approaches to endometrial cancer staging: a single-surgeon experience. Frey MK; Lin JF; Stewart LE; Makaroun L; Panico VJ; Holcomb K J Reprod Med; 2015; 60(3-4):127-34. PubMed ID: 25898475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Fader AN; Escobar PF Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 19481243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short- and long-term morbidity and outcomes after robotic surgery for comprehensive endometrial cancer staging. Backes FJ; Brudie LA; Farrell MR; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ; Bigsby GE; O'Malley D; Cohn DE; Holloway RW; Fowler JM Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 125(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 22387522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]