1304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25132462)
21. Predictors of Overnight Admission after Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy in the Expert Setting.
Moawad G; Tyan P; Vargas V; Park D; Young H; Marfori C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 26(1):122-128. PubMed ID: 29723642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reducing readmissions after robotic surgical management of endometrial cancer: a potential for improved quality care.
Liang MI; Rosen MA; Rath KS; Clements AE; Backes FJ; Eisenhauer EL; Salani R; O'Malley DM; Fowler JM; Cohn DE
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Dec; 131(3):508-11. PubMed ID: 24096114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of three surgical approaches for staging lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer.
Pulman KJ; Dason ES; Philp L; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Laframboise S; Atenafu EG; May T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 136(3):315-319. PubMed ID: 28078775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman?
Gehrig PA; Cantrell LA; Shafer A; Abaid LN; Mendivil A; Boggess JF
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Oct; 111(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18694588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Single-port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: seven years of experience at a single institution.
Moulton L; Jernigan AM; Carr C; Freeman L; Escobar PF; Michener CM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):610.e1-610.e8. PubMed ID: 28619688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations].
Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R
Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.
Leitao MM; Malhotra V; Briscoe G; Suidan R; Dholakiya P; Santos K; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Gardner GJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(11):3561-7. PubMed ID: 23797751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Postoperative Pain Scores and Narcotic Use in Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Staging.
Turner TB; Habib AS; Broadwater G; Valea FA; Fleming ND; Ehrisman JA; Di Santo N; Havrilesky LJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1004-10. PubMed ID: 25967934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A cost analysis of postoperative management in endometrial cancer patients treated by robotics versus laparoscopic approach.
Martino MA; Shubella J; Thomas MB; Morcrette RM; Schindler J; Williams S; Boulay R
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Dec; 123(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 21968341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Same-Day Discharge After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.
Melamed A; Katz Eriksen JL; Hinchcliff EM; Worley MJ; Berkowitz RS; Horowitz NS; Muto MG; Urman RD; Feltmate CM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):178-85. PubMed ID: 25956576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center.
Cardenas-Goicoechea J; Adams S; Bhat SB; Randall TC
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 May; 117(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 20144471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy: a comparison with open surgical operations.
Ditto A; Martinelli F; Bogani G; Gasparri ML; Di Donato V; Zanaboni F; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25468458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 11733973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Safety of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery and early hospital discharge in elderly patients.
Madden N; Frey MK; Joo L; Lee J; Musselman K; Chern JY; Blank SV; Pothuri B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):253.e1-253.e7. PubMed ID: 30557552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Lee HJ; Lee YH; Chong GO; Hong DG; Lee YS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Mar; 44(3):547-555. PubMed ID: 29239059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Learning curve in concurrent application of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.
Torng PL; Pan SP; Hwang JS; Shih HJ; Chen CL
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 56(6):781-787. PubMed ID: 29241920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative Surgical Outcomes for Endometrial Cancer Patients 65 Years Old or Older Staged With Robotics or Laparotomy.
Doo DW; Guntupalli SR; Corr BR; Sheeder J; Davidson SA; Behbakht K; Jarrett MJ; Guy MS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(11):3687-94. PubMed ID: 25672563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robotic high para-aortic lymph node dissection with high port placement using same port for pelvic surgery in gynecologic cancer patients.
Kim TJ; Yoon G; Lee YY; Choi CH; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 26(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 26197858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dual docking robotic surgical staging for high risk endometrial cancer.
Loaec C; Bats AS; Ngo C; Cornou C; Rossi L; Bensaid C; Nos C; Lecuru F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Jun; 225():79-83. PubMed ID: 29679815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
