These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25133756)

  • 1. Restoration as mitigation: analysis of stream mitigation for coal mining impacts in southern Appalachia.
    Palmer MA; Hondula KL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Sep; 48(18):10552-60. PubMed ID: 25133756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consistent declines in aquatic biodiversity across diverse domains of life in rivers impacted by surface coal mining.
    Simonin M; Rocca JD; Gerson JR; Moore E; Brooks AC; Czaplicki L; Ross MRV; Fierer N; Craine JM; Bernhardt ES
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Sep; 31(6):e02389. PubMed ID: 34142402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The environmental costs of mountaintop mining valley fill operations for aquatic ecosystems of the Central Appalachians.
    Bernhardt ES; Palmer MA
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2011 Mar; 1223():39-57. PubMed ID: 21449964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of coal mining, forestry, and road construction on southern Appalachian stream invertebrates and habitats.
    Gangloff MM; Perkins M; Blum PW; Walker C
    Environ Manage; 2015 Mar; 55(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 25528595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interactive effects of water quality, physical habitat, and watershed anthropogenic activities on stream ecosystem health.
    Liao H; Sarver E; Krometis LH
    Water Res; 2018 Mar; 130():69-78. PubMed ID: 29202343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of urbanization and urban stream restoration on the physical and biological structure of stream ecosystems.
    Violin CR; Cada P; Sudduth EB; Hassett BA; Penrose DL; Bernhardt ES
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Sep; 21(6):1932-49. PubMed ID: 21939035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Twenty years of stream restoration in Finland: little response by benthic macroinvertebrate communities.
    Louhi P; Mykrä H; Paavola R; Huusko A; Vehanen T; Mäki-Petäys A; Muotka T
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Sep; 21(6):1950-61. PubMed ID: 21939036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing the field of dreams hypothesis: functional responses to urbanization and restoration in stream ecosystems.
    Sudduth EB; Hassett BA; Cada P; Bernhardt ES
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Sep; 21(6):1972-88. PubMed ID: 21939038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How many mountains can we mine? Assessing the regional degradation of Central Appalachian rivers by surface coal mining.
    Bernhardt ES; Lutz BD; King RS; Fay JP; Carter CE; Helton AM; Campagna D; Amos J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Aug; 46(15):8115-22. PubMed ID: 22788537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deep Impact: Effects of Mountaintop Mining on Surface Topography, Bedrock Structure, and Downstream Waters.
    Ross MR; McGlynn BL; Bernhardt ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(4):2064-74. PubMed ID: 26800154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term impacts on macroinvertebrates downstream of reclaimed mountaintop mining valley fills in Central Appalachia.
    Pond GJ; Passmore ME; Pointon ND; Felbinger JK; Walker CA; Krock KJ; Fulton JB; Nash WL
    Environ Manage; 2014 Oct; 54(4):919-33. PubMed ID: 24990807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selenium dynamics in headwater streams of the central Appalachian coalfield.
    Whitmore KM; Schoenholtz SH; Soucek DJ; Hopkins WA; Zipper CE
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 Oct; 37(10):2714-2726. PubMed ID: 30079541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting mayfly recovery in acid mine-impaired streams using logistic regression models of in-stream habitat and water chemistry.
    Johnson KS; Rankin E; Bowman J; Deeds J; Kruse N
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Mar; 190(4):196. PubMed ID: 29516268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Landscape characteristics of a stream and wetland mitigation banking program.
    BenDor T; Sholtes J; Doyle MW
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Dec; 19(8):2078-92. PubMed ID: 20014580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In-stream microhabitat mosaic depicts the success of mitigation measures and controls the Ecological Potential of benthic communities in heavily modified rivers.
    Buffagni A; Barca E; Erba S; Balestrini R
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jul; 673():489-501. PubMed ID: 30995583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chemistry of streams draining mined and unmined watersheds in the mountaintop mined landscape of Central Appalachia, USA.
    Gerson JR; Moore E; Naslund LC; Rocca J; Simonin M
    Ecology; 2020 Sep; 101(9):e03093. PubMed ID: 32383151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. River restoration: the fuzzy logic of repairing reaches to reverse catchment scale degradation.
    Bernhardt ES; Palmer MA
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Sep; 21(6):1926-31. PubMed ID: 21939034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The US Clean Water Act and habitat replacement: evaluation of mitigation sites in Orange County, California, USA.
    Sudol MF; Ambrose RF
    Environ Manage; 2002 Nov; 30(5):727-34. PubMed ID: 12375092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating expected outcomes of acid remediation in an intensively mined Appalachian watershed.
    Watson AS; Merovich GT; Petty JT; Gutta JB
    Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Jul; 189(7):339. PubMed ID: 28620711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abandoned coal mine drainage and its remediation: impacts on stream ecosystem structure and function.
    Bott TL; Jackson JK; McTammany ME; Newbold JD; Rier ST; Sweeney BW; Battle JM
    Ecol Appl; 2012 Dec; 22(8):2144-63. PubMed ID: 23387116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.