These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25133832)
21. Cross-sectional relationships between dyadic coping and anxiety, depression, and relationship satisfaction for patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. Regan TW; Lambert SD; Kelly B; McElduff P; Girgis A; Kayser K; Turner J Patient Educ Couns; 2014 Jul; 96(1):120-7. PubMed ID: 24880791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. It Takes Two: Sexual Communication Patterns and the Sexual and Relational Adjustment of Couples Coping With Provoked Vestibulodynia. Rancourt KM; Flynn M; Bergeron S; Rosen NO J Sex Med; 2017 Mar; 14(3):434-443. PubMed ID: 28189562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of nonorganic erectile dysfunction on spouses: a study from India. Avasthi A; Grover S; Kaur R; Prakash O; Kulhara P J Sex Med; 2010 Nov; 7(11):3666-74. PubMed ID: 20059659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Marital relationship and health-related quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and their spouses: A longitudinal clinical study. Harju E; Rantanen A; Helminen M; Kaunonen M; Isotalo T; Åstedt-Kurki P J Clin Nurs; 2018 Jul; 27(13-14):2633-2639. PubMed ID: 29516564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Similarity of relationship standards, couple communication patterns, and marital satisfaction among Chinese couples. Chi P; Epstein NB; Fang X; Lam DO; Li X J Fam Psychol; 2013 Oct; 27(5):806-16. PubMed ID: 24015705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sexual, marital, and general life functioning in couples coping with colorectal cancer: a dyadic study across time. Traa MJ; Braeken J; De Vries J; Roukema JA; Slooter GD; Crolla RM; Borremans MP; Den Oudsten BL Psychooncology; 2015 Sep; 24(9):1181-8. PubMed ID: 25800938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prostate cancer patients and their partners: differences in satisfaction indices and psychological variables. Garos S; Kluck A; Aronoff D J Sex Med; 2007 Sep; 4(5):1394-403. PubMed ID: 17634055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Participation in questionnaire studies among couples affected by breast cancer. Terp H; Rottmann N; Larsen PV; Hagedoorn M; Flyger H; Kroman N; Johansen C; Dalton S; Hansen DG Support Care Cancer; 2015 Jul; 23(7):1907-16. PubMed ID: 25487844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Adjunctive cognitive behavioural treatment for chronic pain couples improves marital satisfaction but not pain management outcomes. Ramke S; Sharpe L; Newton-John T Eur J Pain; 2016 Nov; 20(10):1667-1677. PubMed ID: 27135207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does Sexual Satisfaction Change With Relationship Duration? Schmiedeberg C; Schröder J Arch Sex Behav; 2016 Jan; 45(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 26246315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Woman and partner-perceived partner responses predict pain and sexual satisfaction in provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) couples. Rosen NO; Bergeron S; Leclerc B; Lambert B; Steben M J Sex Med; 2010 Nov; 7(11):3715-24. PubMed ID: 20701677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Perceived Partner Responsiveness Mediates the Association Between Sexual and Marital Satisfaction: A Daily Diary Study in Newlywed Couples. Gadassi R; Bar-Nahum LE; Newhouse S; Anderson R; Heiman JR; Rafaeli E; Janssen E Arch Sex Behav; 2016 Jan; 45(1):109-20. PubMed ID: 25680818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) is a sensitive measure of treatment effectiveness for both patients and partners: results of a randomized controlled trial with vardenafil. Rosen R; Goldstein I; Huang XY; Bangerter K; Taylor T J Sex Med; 2007 Jul; 4(4 Pt 1):1009-21. PubMed ID: 17627746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Shared possible selves, other-focus, and perceived wellness of couples with prostate cancer. Wilson SJ; Barrineau MJ; Butner J; Berg CA J Fam Psychol; 2014 Oct; 28(5):684-91. PubMed ID: 25111956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The moderating effect of relationship quality on partner secondary traumatic stress among couples coping with cancer. Brosseau DC; McDonald MJ; Stephen JE Fam Syst Health; 2011 Jun; 29(2):114-26. PubMed ID: 21688903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison of cognitive-behavioral couple therapy and lidocaine in the treatment of provoked vestibulodynia: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Corsini-Munt S; Bergeron S; Rosen NO; Steben M; Mayrand MH; Delisle I; McDuff P; Aerts L; Santerre-Baillargeon M Trials; 2014 Dec; 15():506. PubMed ID: 25540035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Two-Wave Dyadic Analysis of Marital Quality and Loneliness in Later Life: Results From the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing. Stokes JE Res Aging; 2017 Jun; 39(5):635-656. PubMed ID: 26733494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Meta Marriage: Links Between Older Couples' Relationship Narratives and Marital Satisfaction. McCoy A; Rauer A; Sabey A Fam Process; 2017 Dec; 56(4):900-914. PubMed ID: 27169983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Attachment and couple satisfaction as predictors of expressed emotion in women facing breast cancer and their partners in the immediate post-surgery period. Favez N; Cairo Notari S; Antonini T; Charvoz L Br J Health Psychol; 2017 Feb; 22(1):169-185. PubMed ID: 27882634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Marital functioning in early versus late-onset alcoholic couples. Epstein EE; McCrady BS; Hirsch LS Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1997 May; 21(3):547-56. PubMed ID: 9161616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]