BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25134453)

  • 1. The burden of false-positive results in analog and digital screening mammography: experience of the Nova Scotia Breast Screening Program.
    Payne JI; Martin T; Caines JS; Duggan R
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2014 Nov; 65(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 25134453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction in false-positive results after introduction of digital mammography: analysis from four population-based breast cancer screening programs in Spain.
    Sala M; Salas D; Belvis F; Sánchez M; Ferrer J; Ibañez J; Román R; Ferrer F; Vega A; Laso MS; Castells X
    Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):388-95. PubMed ID: 21273520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors Impacting False Positive Recall in Screening Mammography.
    Honig EL; Mullen LA; Amir T; Alvin MD; Jones MK; Ambinder EB; Falomo ET; Harvey SC
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Nov; 26(11):1505-1512. PubMed ID: 30772138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review of interval breast cancers diagnosed among participants of the Nova Scotia Breast Screening Program.
    Payne JI; Caines JS; Gallant J; Foley TJ
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 23169791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ten years of breast screening in the Nova Scotia Breast Screening Program, 1991-2001. experience: use of an adaptable stereotactic device in the diagnosis of screening-detected abnormalities.
    Caines JS; Schaller GH; Iles SE; Woods ER; Barnes PJ; Johnson AJ; Jones GR; Borgaonkar JN; Rowe JA; Topp TJ; Porter GA
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2005 Apr; 56(2):82-93. PubMed ID: 15957275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association between Breast Parenchymal Complexity and False-Positive Recall From Digital Mammography Versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Preliminary Investigation in the ACRIN PA 4006 Trial.
    Ray S; Chen L; Keller BM; Chen J; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Aug; 23(8):977-86. PubMed ID: 27236612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementation of digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: effect of screening round on recall rate and cancer detection.
    Sala M; Comas M; Macià F; Martinez J; Casamitjana M; Castells X
    Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 19420316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammography Clinical Image Quality and the False Positive Rate in a Canadian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Guertin MH; Théberge I; Zomahoun HTV; Dufresne MP; Pelletier É; Brisson J
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2018 May; 69(2):169-175. PubMed ID: 29706254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis.
    Dabbous FM; Dolecek TA; Berbaum ML; Friedewald SM; Summerfelt WT; Hoskins K; Rauscher GH
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2017 Mar; 26(3):397-403. PubMed ID: 28183826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization.
    Burman ML; Taplin SH; Herta DF; Elmore JG
    Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jul; 131(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10391809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk stratification of women with false-positive test results in mammography screening based on mammographic morphology and density: A case control study.
    Winkel RR; Euler-Chelpin MV; Lynge E; Diao P; Lillholm M; Kallenberg M; Forman JL; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Nielsen M; Vejborg I
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 49():53-60. PubMed ID: 28558329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program.
    Séradour B; Heid P; Estève J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jan; 202(1):229-36. PubMed ID: 24370149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast screening using 2D-mammography or integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) for single-reading or double-reading--evidence to guide future screening strategies.
    Houssami N; Macaskill P; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Ciatto S
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jul; 50(10):1799-1807. PubMed ID: 24746887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age-based versus Risk-based Mammography Screening in Women 40-49 Years Old: A Cross-sectional Study.
    Burnside ES; Trentham-Dietz A; Shafer CM; Hampton JM; Alagoz O; Cox JR; Mischo E; Schrager SB; Wilke LG
    Radiology; 2019 Aug; 292(2):321-328. PubMed ID: 31184557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiologists' interpretive efficiency and variability in true- and false-positive detection when screen-reading with tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) relative to standard mammography in population screening.
    Svahn TM; Macaskill P; Houssami N
    Breast; 2015 Dec; 24(6):687-93. PubMed ID: 26433751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program.
    Hambly NM; McNicholas MM; Phelan N; Hargaden GC; O'Doherty A; Flanagan FL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1010-8. PubMed ID: 19770323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D-mammography on radiologists' true-positive and false-positive detection in a population screening trial: A descriptive study.
    Bernardi D; Li T; Pellegrini M; Macaskill P; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Houssami N
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():26-31. PubMed ID: 30150047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nova Scotia Breast Screening Program experience: use of needle core biopsy in the diagnosis of screening-detected abnormalities.
    Caines JS; Chantziantoniou K; Wright BA; Konok GP; Iles SE; Bodurtha A; Zayid I; Daniels C
    Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 8539363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic imaging and biopsy pathways following abnormal screen-film and digital screening mammography.
    Hubbard RA; Zhu W; Horblyuk R; Karliner L; Sprague BL; Henderson L; Lee D; Onega T; Buist DS; Sweet A
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Apr; 138(3):879-87. PubMed ID: 23471650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.