BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25134690)

  • 1. Protocols utilizing constant pH molecular dynamics to compute pH-dependent binding free energies.
    Kim MO; Blachly PG; Kaus JW; McCammon JA
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jan; 119(3):861-72. PubMed ID: 25134690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computational scheme for pH-dependent binding free energy calculation with explicit solvent.
    Lee J; Miller BT; Brooks BR
    Protein Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):231-43. PubMed ID: 26189656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thermodynamic integration to predict host-guest binding affinities.
    Lawrenz M; Wereszczynski J; Ortiz-Sánchez JM; Nichols SE; McCammon JA
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 May; 26(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 22350568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring pH Dependent Host/Guest Binding Affinities.
    Paul TJ; Vilseck JZ; Hayes RL; Brooks CL
    J Phys Chem B; 2020 Jul; 124(30):6520-6528. PubMed ID: 32628482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SAMPL6 host-guest challenge: binding free energies via a multistep approach.
    Eken Y; Patel P; Díaz T; Jones MR; Wilson AK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1097-1115. PubMed ID: 30225724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.
    Song LF; Bansal N; Zheng Z; Merz KM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1013-1026. PubMed ID: 30143917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computation of pH-dependent binding free energies.
    Kim MO; McCammon JA
    Biopolymers; 2016 Jan; 105(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 26202905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Converging free energies of binding in cucurbit[7]uril and octa-acid host-guest systems from SAMPL4 using expanded ensemble simulations.
    Monroe JI; Shirts MR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):401-15. PubMed ID: 24610238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conformational Dynamics and Binding Free Energies of Inhibitors of BACE-1: From the Perspective of Protonation Equilibria.
    Kim MO; Blachly PG; McCammon JA
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Oct; 11(10):e1004341. PubMed ID: 26506513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Absolute binding free energies for the SAMPL6 cucurbit[8]uril host-guest challenge via the AMOEBA polarizable force field.
    Laury ML; Wang Z; Gordon AS; Ponder JW
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1087-1095. PubMed ID: 30324303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of SAMPL4 host-guest binding affinities using funnel metadynamics.
    Hsiao YW; Söderhjelm P
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Apr; 28(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 24535628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of CB[8] host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL6 using the double-decoupling method.
    Han K; Hudson PS; Jones MR; Nishikawa N; Tofoleanu F; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1059-1073. PubMed ID: 30084077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A replica exchange umbrella sampling (REUS) approach to predict host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL8 challenge.
    Ghorbani M; Hudson PS; Jones MR; Aviat F; Meana-Pañeda R; Klauda JB; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 May; 35(5):667-677. PubMed ID: 33939083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.
    Rizzi A; Jensen T; Slochower DR; Aldeghi M; Gapsys V; Ntekoumes D; Bosisio S; Papadourakis M; Henriksen NM; de Groot BL; Cournia Z; Dickson A; Michel J; Gilson MK; Shirts MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):601-633. PubMed ID: 31984465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.
    Rizzi A; Murkli S; McNeill JN; Yao W; Sullivan M; Gilson MK; Chiu MW; Isaacs L; Gibb BC; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):937-963. PubMed ID: 30415285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blinded predictions of standard binding free energies: lessons learned from the SAMPL6 challenge.
    Papadourakis M; Bosisio S; Michel J
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1047-1058. PubMed ID: 30159717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the fly estimation of host-guest binding free energies using the movable type method: participation in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.
    Bansal N; Zheng Z; Cerutti DS; Merz KM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 27699553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Force-field and quantum-mechanical binding study of selected SAMPL3 host-guest complexes.
    Hamaguchi N; Fusti-Molnar L; Wlodek S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 May; 26(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 22366954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computational Calorimetry: High-Precision Calculation of Host-Guest Binding Thermodynamics.
    Henriksen NM; Fenley AT; Gilson MK
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Sep; 11(9):4377-94. PubMed ID: 26523125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accurate Receptor-Ligand Binding Free Energies from Fast QM Conformational Chemical Space Sampling.
    Boz E; Stein M
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Mar; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 33802920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.