These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25135317)

  • 1. Efficacy of CBCT for assessment of impacted mandibular third molars: a review - based on a hierarchical model of evidence.
    Matzen LH; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(1):20140189. PubMed ID: 25135317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomography findings for impacted mandibular third molar root and inferior alveolar nerve canal relation.
    Patel PS; Shah JS; Dudhia BB; Butala PB; Jani YV; Macwan RS
    Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(1):91-102. PubMed ID: 32246689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT findings in the assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal.
    Neves FS; Souza TC; Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ; Bóscolo FN
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Oct; 41(7):553-7. PubMed ID: 22282507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Panoramic radiography in evaluating the relationship of mandibular canal and impacted third molars in comparison with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Ishak MH; Zhun OC; Shaari R; Rahman SA; Hasan MN; Alam MK
    Mymensingh Med J; 2014 Oct; 23(4):781-6. PubMed ID: 25481601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiologic assessment of mandibular third molars: an ex vivo comparative study of panoramic radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography, and cone beam computed tomography.
    Freire BB; Nascimento EHL; Vasconcelos KF; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Aug; 128(2):166-175. PubMed ID: 31072782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography findings in preoperative examination of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Peker I; Sarikir C; Alkurt MT; Zor ZF
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 Jun; 14():71. PubMed ID: 24928108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiographic signs of pathology determining removal of an impacted mandibular third molar assessed in a panoramic image or CBCT.
    Matzen LH; Schropp L; Spin-Neto R; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Jan; 46(1):20160330. PubMed ID: 27681861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiographic methods used before removal of mandibular third molars among randomly selected general dental clinics.
    Matzen LH; Petersen LB; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150226. PubMed ID: 26943178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography.
    Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Bergé SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 38(9):964-71. PubMed ID: 19640685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contiguity between the mandibular canal and the mandibular third molar in panoramic tomography compared with cone beam computed tomography: a topographic analysis.
    Deppe H; Ritschl LM; Kleinschmidt J; Wagenpfeil S; Sculean A
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(6):470-477. PubMed ID: 31086860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can preoperative imaging help to predict postoperative outcome after wisdom tooth removal? A randomized controlled trial using panoramic radiography versus cone-beam CT.
    Guerrero ME; Botetano R; Beltran J; Horner K; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):335-42. PubMed ID: 23494455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Mahesh MS; Mahima VG; Patil K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 21891889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of cone beam CT on treatment plan before surgical intervention of mandibular third molars and impact of radiographic factors on deciding on coronectomy vs surgical removal.
    Matzen LH; Christensen J; Hintze H; Schou S; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(1):98870341. PubMed ID: 22933533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal bone loss in the second molar related to impacted mandibular third molars: comparison between panoramic images and cone beam computed tomography.
    Dias MJ; Franco A; Junqueira JL; Fayad FT; Pereira PH; Oenning AC
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2020 May; 25(3):e395-e402. PubMed ID: 32271319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferior alveolar nerve sensory disturbance after impacted mandibular third molar evaluation using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography: a pilot study.
    Guerrero ME; Nackaerts O; Beinsberger J; Horner K; Schoenaers J; Jacobs R;
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 70(10):2264-70. PubMed ID: 22705219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular third molars: an ex vivo comparative study between multilayer and conventional panoramic radiography.
    Machado AH; Freitas DQ; Fontenele RC; Farias-Gomes A; Francesquini Júnior L; Ambrosano GMB
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Nov; 27(11):6451-6460. PubMed ID: 37728617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography, stereo-scanography and cone beam CT for assessment of mandibular third molars before surgery.
    Hauge Matzen L; Christensen J; Hintze H; Schou S; Wenzel A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Nov; 71(6):1391-8. PubMed ID: 23356838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inferior alveolar nerve injury: Correlation between indicators of risk on panoramic radiographs and the incidence of tooth and mandibular canal contact on cone-beam computed tomography scans in a Western Australian population.
    Winstanley KL; Otway LM; Thompson L; Brook ZH; King N; Koong B; O'Halloran M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2018 Aug; 9(3):e12323. PubMed ID: 29399983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility of mandibular third molar assessment comparing two cone beam CT units in a matched pairs design.
    Matzen LH; Hintze H; Spin-Neto R; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130228. PubMed ID: 24052253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Signs of the proximity of third molar roots to the mandibular canal: an observational study in panoramic radiographs.
    Lacerda-Santos JT; Granja GL; Catão MHCV; Araújo FF; Freitas GB; Araújo-Filho JCWP; Freire JCP; Dias-Ribeiro E; Santos JA
    Gen Dent; 2020; 68(2):30-35. PubMed ID: 32105223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.